Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Municipality Of Anchorage V. Hitachi Cable, Ltd.- Time For Adoption Of A Void Contract Remedy For Alaska Public Contracting Authorities, Sheridan Strickland Dec 1989

Municipality Of Anchorage V. Hitachi Cable, Ltd.- Time For Adoption Of A Void Contract Remedy For Alaska Public Contracting Authorities, Sheridan Strickland

Alaska Law Review

No abstract provided.


Much Ado About Mighty Little - North Carolina And The Application Of The Relative Hardship Doctrine To Encroachments Of Permanent Structures On The Property Of Another, Olivia L. Weeks Jan 1989

Much Ado About Mighty Little - North Carolina And The Application Of The Relative Hardship Doctrine To Encroachments Of Permanent Structures On The Property Of Another, Olivia L. Weeks

Campbell Law Review

This paper presents a legal argument for the application of the relative hardship test in all actions based on the encroachment of permanent structures on the land of another. First, the doctrine of relative hardship is presented. Second, this paper reviews the cases handed down by the North Carolina courts which have applied or discussed the application of the relative hardship test. Finally, this paper recommends the application of the relative hardship test as the most objective standard for determining an appropriate remedy where a mandatory injunction to compel removal is an issue.