Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 15 of 15

Full-Text Articles in Law

Gender, Voting Rights, And The Nineteenth Amendment, Paula A. Monopoli Jan 2022

Gender, Voting Rights, And The Nineteenth Amendment, Paula A. Monopoli

Faculty Scholarship

One hundred years after the woman suffrage amendment became part of the United States Constitution, a federal court has held—for the first time—that a plaintiff must establish intentional discrimination to prevail on a direct constitutional claim under the Nineteenth Amendment. In adopting that threshold standard, the court simply reasoned by strict textual analogy to the Fifteenth Amendment and asserted that “there is no reason to read the Nineteenth Amendment differently from the Fifteenth Amendment.” This paper’s thesis is that, to the contrary, the Nineteenth Amendment is deserving of judicial analysis independent of the Fifteenth Amendment because it has a distinct …


The Right To Same-Sex Marriage: Formalism, Realism, And Social Change In Lawrence (2003), Windsor (2013), & Obergefell (2015), Ronald Kahn Dec 2015

The Right To Same-Sex Marriage: Formalism, Realism, And Social Change In Lawrence (2003), Windsor (2013), & Obergefell (2015), Ronald Kahn

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Can, Do, And Should Legal Entities Have Dignity?: The Case Of The State, Maxwell O. Chibundu Dec 2015

Can, Do, And Should Legal Entities Have Dignity?: The Case Of The State, Maxwell O. Chibundu

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Time For Change: Why The Msm Lifetime Deferral Policy Should Be Amended, Vianca Diaz Jan 2013

A Time For Change: Why The Msm Lifetime Deferral Policy Should Be Amended, Vianca Diaz

University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class

"A Time for Change: Why the MSM Lifetime Deferral Policy Should be Amended," discusses the need to amend the men who have sex with men (MSM) Lifetime Deferral to blood donations enforced by the Food and Drug Administration. This comment reviews the current policy within the current legal and cultural landscape and argues for the immediate need for reform.


Conaway V. Deane: To Have And To Hold, From This Day Forward—Maryland’S Unfit Marriage To Federal Equal Protection Analysis, Rachel A. Shapiro Jan 2009

Conaway V. Deane: To Have And To Hold, From This Day Forward—Maryland’S Unfit Marriage To Federal Equal Protection Analysis, Rachel A. Shapiro

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Engquist V. Oregon Department Of Agriculture: No Harm Meant? The Vanquished Requirement Of Ill-Will In Class-Of-One Equal Protection Claims And The Erosion Of Public Employees’ Constitutional Rights, Kerstin Miller Jan 2009

Engquist V. Oregon Department Of Agriculture: No Harm Meant? The Vanquished Requirement Of Ill-Will In Class-Of-One Equal Protection Claims And The Erosion Of Public Employees’ Constitutional Rights, Kerstin Miller

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Are You My Mother?: Removing A Gestational Surrogate’S Name From The Birth Certificate In The Name Of Equal Protection, Erin V. Podolny Jan 2008

Are You My Mother?: Removing A Gestational Surrogate’S Name From The Birth Certificate In The Name Of Equal Protection, Erin V. Podolny

University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class

No abstract provided.


Johnson V. California: Setting A Constitutional Trap For Prison Officials, Rachel C. Grumberger Jan 2006

Johnson V. California: Setting A Constitutional Trap For Prison Officials, Rachel C. Grumberger

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Stepping Through Grutter'S Open Doors: What The University Of Michigan Affirmative Action Cases Mean For Race-Conscious Government Decisionmaking, Helen L. Norton Oct 2005

Stepping Through Grutter'S Open Doors: What The University Of Michigan Affirmative Action Cases Mean For Race-Conscious Government Decisionmaking, Helen L. Norton

Faculty Scholarship

In Grutter, a majority of the Court for the first time identified an instrumental justification for race-based government decisionmaking as compelling -- specifically, a public law school’s interest in attaining a diverse student body. Grutter not only recognized the value of diversity in higher education, but left open the possibility that the Court might find similar justifications compelling as well. The switch to instrumental justifications for affirmative action appears a strategic response to the Court’s narrowing of the availability of remedial rationales. A number of thoughtful commentators, however, have reacted to this trend with concern and even dismay, questioning whether …


The Courts, Congress, And Educational Adequacy: The Equal Protection Predicament, Betsy Levin Jan 1979

The Courts, Congress, And Educational Adequacy: The Equal Protection Predicament, Betsy Levin

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Strengthening Equal Protection Analysis In Maryland: Territorial Classification And In Re Trader Jan 1975

Strengthening Equal Protection Analysis In Maryland: Territorial Classification And In Re Trader

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Case Of The Pregnant School Teachers: An Equal Protection Analysis Jan 1974

The Case Of The Pregnant School Teachers: An Equal Protection Analysis

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Equal Protection: Is There A Constitutional Right To A Sewer? - Hawkins V. Town Of Shaw Jan 1972

Equal Protection: Is There A Constitutional Right To A Sewer? - Hawkins V. Town Of Shaw

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Imprisonment Of Indigents For Non-Payment Of Fines: Equal Protection Or Substitute Punishment? - Morris V. Schoonfield Jan 1969

Imprisonment Of Indigents For Non-Payment Of Fines: Equal Protection Or Substitute Punishment? - Morris V. Schoonfield

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Discretionary Action Of Park Board In Excluding Negro Golfers Not Subject To Mandamus - Board Of Park Commissioners Of Baltimore City V. Murphy Jan 1943

Discretionary Action Of Park Board In Excluding Negro Golfers Not Subject To Mandamus - Board Of Park Commissioners Of Baltimore City V. Murphy

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.