Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1)
-
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Military, War, and Peace (1)
- National Security Law (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Women's Health (1)
- Women's Studies (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Contraceptive Equity: Curing The Sex Discrimination In The Aca's Mandate, Greer Donley
Contraceptive Equity: Curing The Sex Discrimination In The Aca's Mandate, Greer Donley
Articles
Birth control is typically viewed as a woman’s problem despite the fact that men and women are equally capable of using contraception. The Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate (Mandate), which requires insurers to cover all female methods of birth control without cost, promotes this assumption and reinforces contraceptive inequity between the sexes. By excluding men, the Mandate burdens women in four ways: it fails to financially support a quarter to a third of women that rely on male birth control to prevent pregnancy; it incentivizes women to endure the risks and side effects of birth control when safer options exist …
Immutability And Innateness Arguments About Lesbian, Gay, And Bisexual Rights, Edward Stein
Immutability And Innateness Arguments About Lesbian, Gay, And Bisexual Rights, Edward Stein
Articles
No abstract provided.
On The Contemporary Meaning Of Korematsu: 'Liberty Lies In The Hearts Of Men And Women', David A. Harris
On The Contemporary Meaning Of Korematsu: 'Liberty Lies In The Hearts Of Men And Women', David A. Harris
Articles
In just a few years, seven decades will have passed since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Korematsu v. U.S., one of the most reviled of all of the Court’s cases. Despised or not, however, similarities between the World War II era and our own have people looking at Korematsu in a new light. When the Court decided Korematsu in 1944, we were at war with the Japanese empire, and with this came considerable suspicion of anyone who shared the ethnicity of our foreign enemies. Since 2001, we have faced another external threat – from the al Queda terrorists – …