Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Jurisprudence Of Willfulness: An Evolving Theory Of Excusable Ignorance, Sharon L. Davies
The Jurisprudence Of Willfulness: An Evolving Theory Of Excusable Ignorance, Sharon L. Davies
Duke Law Journal
Ignorantia legis non excusat-ignorance of the law does not excuse-is a centuries-old criminal law maxim familiar to lawyer and layperson alike. Under the doctrine, an accused finds little protection in the claim "But, I did not know the law," for all are presumed either to be familiar with the law's commands or to proceed in ignorance at their own peril. The ignorant must be punished along with the knowing, the maxim teaches, to achieve a better educated and more law-abiding populace and to avoid the easy-to-assert and difficult-to-dispute claim of ignorance that would otherwise flow from the lips of any …
Racial Disparity And The Death Penalty, John C. Mcadams
Racial Disparity And The Death Penalty, John C. Mcadams
Law and Contemporary Problems
McAdams examines the rhetoric and data supporting the "mass market" version of the racial disparity thesis. The system is racist in that it punishes those who kill whites more severely than those who kill blacks.
The Quality Of Justice In Capital Cases: Illinois As A Case Study, Leigh B. Bienen
The Quality Of Justice In Capital Cases: Illinois As A Case Study, Leigh B. Bienen
Law and Contemporary Problems
Bienen uses Illinois as a case study of injustice in capital cases. The quality of justice in the trial and appeal of capital cases in Illinois is of a very low standard.
Sentenced For A “Crime” The Government Did Not Prove: Jones V. United States And The Constitutional Limitations On Factfinding By Sentencing Factors Rather Than Elements Of The Offense, Benjamin J. Priester
Sentenced For A “Crime” The Government Did Not Prove: Jones V. United States And The Constitutional Limitations On Factfinding By Sentencing Factors Rather Than Elements Of The Offense, Benjamin J. Priester
Law and Contemporary Problems
Priester argues that the Constitution does restrict the power of the legislature by requiring that certain facts be proved as elements of the offense. He notes the Supreme Court's missed opportunity in "Jones v. United States" to adopt the test proposed by Justice Scalia.
Alaska Supreme Court, Alaska Court Of Appeals, U.S. District Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, And U.S. District Court For The District Of Alaska Year In Review, Gregory M. Bair, Mercedes J. Caravello, Michael J. Chiavalloti, Emily J. Grogan
Alaska Supreme Court, Alaska Court Of Appeals, U.S. District Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, And U.S. District Court For The District Of Alaska Year In Review, Gregory M. Bair, Mercedes J. Caravello, Michael J. Chiavalloti, Emily J. Grogan
Alaska Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reallocating Interpretive Criminal-Lawmaking Power Within The Executive Branch, Dan M. Kahan
Reallocating Interpretive Criminal-Lawmaking Power Within The Executive Branch, Dan M. Kahan
Law and Contemporary Problems
A strategy for regaining control of federal criminal law, the reallocation of interpretive criminal law-making power within the Executive Branch, is discussed.