Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Turner V. State, 340 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1976), Melanie Hines Alford
Turner V. State, 340 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1976), Melanie Hines Alford
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law- ETHICS- PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE IS A "LAW FIRM" FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER CONFLICT EXISTS IN REPRESENTATION OF CODEFENDANTS.
Burgess V. State, 313 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1975), Cert. Denied, 326 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1976), Wilbert Stevenson, Jr.
Burgess V. State, 313 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1975), Cert. Denied, 326 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1976), Wilbert Stevenson, Jr.
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law- ARREST- COURT UPHOLDS THE RIGHT TO RESIST AN UNLAWFUL ARREST, BUT ISSUE SHOULD BE REVISITED UNDER NEW STATUTE.
Williams V. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1975), Richard W. Epstein
Williams V. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1975), Richard W. Epstein
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law- GUILTY PLEAS- FACTUAL BASIS DETERMINATION NOT MANDATORY WHEN A COURT ACCEPTS A PLEA OF GUILTY OR NOLO CONTENDERE.
In Re Forfeiture Of The Following Described Vehicle, 1972 Porsche 2 Dr., '74 Florida License Tag Id 91788 Vin #9111200334, 307 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1975), Michael P. Mabile
In Re Forfeiture Of The Following Described Vehicle, 1972 Porsche 2 Dr., '74 Florida License Tag Id 91788 Vin #9111200334, 307 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1975), Michael P. Mabile
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law- FORFEITURES- SIGNIFICANT INVOLVEMENT IN ILLICIT DRUG OPERATION REQUIRED TO JUSTIFY AUTOMOBILE FORFEITURE; EVIDENCE OBTAINED BY ILLEGAL SEARCH INADMISSIBLE IN FORFEITURE PROCEEDING; IMPOUNDMENT OF AUTOMOBILE WITHOUT WARRANT IN ABSENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE AND EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES INVALIDATES RELATED INVENTORY SEARCH.
State V. Roman, 309 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1975), Joslyn Wilson
State V. Roman, 309 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1975), Joslyn Wilson
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law- SEARCH AND SEIZURE- THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FLORIDA'S KNOCK AND ANNOUNCE STATUTE AND THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE.
State V. Latimore, 284 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1973), Cert. Denied, 291 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1974), Florida State University Law Review
State V. Latimore, 284 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1973), Cert. Denied, 291 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1974), Florida State University Law Review
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law- FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- INVESTIGATIVE REPORTS NEITHER SIGNED BY NOR DIRECTLY QUOTING A DECLARANT ARE NOT DISCOVERABLE "STATEMENTS" WITHIN RULE 3.220.
Lurie V. Florida State Board Of Dentistry, 288 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1973), Florida State University Law Review
Lurie V. Florida State Board Of Dentistry, 288 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1973), Florida State University Law Review
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law- STATUTORY IMMUNITY- USE OF TESTIMONY PROVIDED PURSUANT TO FLORIDA IMMUNITY STATUTE PROHIBITED IN SUBSEQUENT CRIMINAL OR CIVIL PROCEEDING INITIATED AGAINST DECLARANT BY STATE.
Tollett V. State, 272 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1973), Florida State University Law Review
Tollett V. State, 272 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1973), Florida State University Law Review
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law-WIRETAPPING-CONSENTING PARTY TO CONVERSATION RECORDED BY POLICE WITHOUT WARRANT REQUIRED TO VERIFY AT TRIAL CONSENT TO RECORDING PRIOR TO ITS ADMISSION AGAINST OTHER PARTY TO CONVERSATION.