Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (21)
- Richard Adelstein (11)
- David B Kopel (3)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Diane Webber (2)
-
- Melanie M. Reid (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Brenda A McKinney (1)
- C. Peter Erlinder (1)
- Choky Risda Ramadhan Mr. (1)
- Deborah M. Weissman (1)
- Derek R VerHagen (1)
- Edgardo Rotman (1)
- George Mason University School of Law Working Papers Series (1)
- Gregory S. Gordon (1)
- Hillary A Henderson (1)
- Hugh Mundy (1)
- Jessica S Peake (1)
- Michael Anderson (1)
- Michael L Perlin (1)
- Nasiruddin Nezaami (1)
- Ryan T. Williams (1)
- San Diego International Law Journal (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Surabhi Chopra Prof. (1)
- Trisha Olson (1)
- University of Miami Inter-American Law Review (1)
- Working Paper Series (1)
- Zhenjie ZHOU (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 61 - 65 of 65
Full-Text Articles in Law
Informational Paradox And The Pricing Of Crime: Capital Sentencing Standards In Economic Perspective, Richard Adelstein
Informational Paradox And The Pricing Of Crime: Capital Sentencing Standards In Economic Perspective, Richard Adelstein
Richard Adelstein
A further development of the price exaction model and an application to the problem of sentencing standards.
The Negotiated Guilty Plea: A Framework For Analysis, Richard Adelstein
The Negotiated Guilty Plea: A Framework For Analysis, Richard Adelstein
Richard Adelstein
An early exposition of the price exaction framework and the place of plea bargaining in it.
The Negotiated Guilty Plea: A Framework For Analysis, Richard Adelstein
The Negotiated Guilty Plea: A Framework For Analysis, Richard Adelstein
Richard Adelstein
My dissertation of 1975, published by Garland Publishing in their series Outstanding Dissertations in Economics, 1984
"Criminal Records"--A Comparative Approach, Sigmund A. Cohn
"Criminal Records"--A Comparative Approach, Sigmund A. Cohn
Scholarly Works
There is in the United States a need to balance the interest of the public in the apprehension and conviction of criminals with that of individuals arrested but not convicted of any wrongdoing. As has been shown, some of the leading civil law countries have approached this goal in two ways: first, by not requiring an arrest in a great number of criminal cases and thus not furthering in the mind of the public the idea that arrest and criminal wrongdoing are identical, and second, by confining entries in criminal records, at least on principle, to final convictions of criminal …