Law Commons^™

What's Wrong With Shareholder Empowerment?, Bernard S. Sharfman

Bernard S Sharfman

In his keynote address at the Journal of Corporation Law spring banquet (March 8, 2012), Mr. Sharfman discusses the negative impact shareholder empowerment has on the efficiency of decision making at public companies. Shareholder empowerment is the shifting of decision making from the board of directors and executive management to shareholders.

Why Proxy Access Is Harmful To Corporate Governance, Bernard S. Sharfman

Bernard S Sharfman

Historically, the SEC has allowed public companies to exclude from their proxy materials shareholder proposals for the nomination of directors by shareholders. This rule has allowed the nomination of directors to remain under the control of the board of directors and its nominating committee. However, under amended Rule 14a-8(i)(8), shareholders will now be able to include proposals on proxy access in a public company’s proxy materials. Public companies can now expect to receive such proposals for inclusion in their proxy materials for the 2012 proxy season.When voting on proxy access proposals, shareholders need to understand that proxy access is a …

Midwest Corporate Law Scholars Conference Presentation: Mitigating The Harmful Effects Of Proxy Access (Sec Rule 14a-11), Bernard S. Sharfman

Bernard S Sharfman

Presentation given at the Midwest Corporate Law Scholars Conference (June 15, 2011)

Using The Law To Reduce Systemic Risk, Bernard S. Sharfman

Bernard S Sharfman

The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act will have a major impact on how the financial sector operates. For example, the Act will prohibit banking entities from engaging in the ‘proprietary trading” of financial instruments unrelated to customer-driven business. Surely, this and other provisions found in the Act will help reduce the financial sector’s proclivity for creating systemic risk.

However, the approach taken in the Act to reduce systemic risk is incomplete. The problem is that it is backward-looking. The Act does not take into consideration that, if history is any guide, financial innovation will lead to the development of new financial …

Wall Street's Corporate Governance Crisis, Bernard S. Sharfman, Steven J. Toll, Alan Szydlowski

Bernard S Sharfman

The board of directors of a public company is only responsible for a relatively few of the almost infinite number of decisions that are made at a public company over any period of time. Yet, when a corporate board does make a decision, for example, the appointment of a chief executive officer or the approval and recommendation to shareholders of a merger agreement, the decision can have a major impact on the firm. Now, based on the fallout from the financial crisis of 2008, we can add corporate board approval of company-wide compensation policies to the list of board decisions …

Enhancing The Efficiency Of Board Decision Making: Lessons Learned From The Financial Crisis Of 2008, Bernard S. Sharfman

Bernard S Sharfman

As a result of the financial crisis of 2008, the employment compensation policies and decisions of Wall Street corporate boards have come under close scrutiny. More specifically, the willingness to approve company wide compensation plans that resulted in the paying out of billions of dollars in bonuses even in the face of deteriorating financial and economic conditions. If only these and other Wall Street firms had retained the bulk of these large annual bonuses over the last several years when the financial markets were noticeably in decline, perhaps the economic impact of the current financial crisis would have been less …

The Enduring Legacy Of Smith V. Van Gorkom, Bernard S. Sharfman

Bernard S Sharfman

It is hard to envision an introductory law school course in corporate law that does not devote at least one or two classes to the study of Smith v. Van Gorkom (Van Gorkom), possibly the most famous corporate law case decided by the Delaware Supreme Court. It has become such a foundation case for the beginning study of corporate law that one prominent corporate law commentator has likened the failure to teach Van Gorkom to the omission of Brown v. Board of Education in a first year constitutional law course.

The challenge for teachers of Van Gorkom is to explain …

Understanding Maryland's Business Judgment Rule, Bernard S. Sharfman

Bernard S Sharfman

No abstract provided.