Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Constitutional Law

2011

Gordon G. Young

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Judicial Review Of Informal Agency Action On The Fiftieth Anniversary Of The Apa: The Alleged Demise And Actual Status Of Overton Park's Requirement Of Judicial Review "On The Record", Gordon G. Young Aug 2011

Judicial Review Of Informal Agency Action On The Fiftieth Anniversary Of The Apa: The Alleged Demise And Actual Status Of Overton Park's Requirement Of Judicial Review "On The Record", Gordon G. Young

Gordon G. Young

No abstract provided.


Congressional Regulation Of Federal Courts' Jurisdiction And Processes: United States V. Klein Revisited, Gordon G. Young Aug 2011

Congressional Regulation Of Federal Courts' Jurisdiction And Processes: United States V. Klein Revisited, Gordon G. Young

Gordon G. Young

No abstract provided.


The Significance Of Border Crossings: Lopez, Morrison And The Fate Of Congressional Power To Regulate Goods, And Transactions Connected With Them, Based On Prior Passage Through Interstate Commerce, Gordon G. Young Aug 2011

The Significance Of Border Crossings: Lopez, Morrison And The Fate Of Congressional Power To Regulate Goods, And Transactions Connected With Them, Based On Prior Passage Through Interstate Commerce, Gordon G. Young

Gordon G. Young

No abstract provided.


Some Reflections On Gramm-Rudman-Hollings, Gordon G. Young Aug 2011

Some Reflections On Gramm-Rudman-Hollings, Gordon G. Young

Gordon G. Young

No abstract provided.


Justifying Motive Analysis In Judicial Review, Gordon G. Young Aug 2011

Justifying Motive Analysis In Judicial Review, Gordon G. Young

Gordon G. Young

Motives concern us in ordinary life and in the law of torts and crimes, and that concern is justified by consequentialist ethics. Despite occasional judicial protestations, motive analysis pervades large parts of constitutional law. Illegitimate motives aimed at suspect classes, or "designed to strike" at any number of rights identified as fundamental, presumptively invalidate the official actions that they animate. The consequentialist arguments for the use of motive review in this class of cases are relatively simple. Such illegitimate official motives tend to cause bad distributions of tangible benefits and burdens, or cause direct cognitive or emotional harm to the …