Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Constitutional Law

Faculty Publications

2005

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Reflections On The Teaching Of Constitutional Law, William W. Van Alstyne Apr 2005

Reflections On The Teaching Of Constitutional Law, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Constitutional Law As Political Spoils, William P. Marshall Jan 2005

Constitutional Law As Political Spoils, William P. Marshall

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Crawford V. Washington: Encouraging And Ensuring The Confrontation Of Witnesses, Robert P. Mosteller Jan 2005

Crawford V. Washington: Encouraging And Ensuring The Confrontation Of Witnesses, Robert P. Mosteller

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Constitutional Limits To Court-Stripping, Michael J. Gerhardt Jan 2005

The Constitutional Limits To Court-Stripping, Michael J. Gerhardt

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Limited Path Dependency Of Precedent, Michael J. Gerhardt Jan 2005

The Limited Path Dependency Of Precedent, Michael J. Gerhardt

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Academic Expert Before Congress: Observations And Lessons From Bill Van Alstyne's Testimony, Neal Devins Jan 2005

The Academic Expert Before Congress: Observations And Lessons From Bill Van Alstyne's Testimony, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Is Morrison Dead? Assessing A Supreme Drug (Law) Overdose, Jonathan H. Adler Jan 2005

Is Morrison Dead? Assessing A Supreme Drug (Law) Overdose, Jonathan H. Adler

Faculty Publications

There was little doubt that the federal government would prevail in Gonzales v. Raich. What was, perhaps, unexpected was so expansive a repudiation of enforceable judicial limitations on federal power. In upholding the constitutionality of the Controlled Substances Act as applied to the non-commercial intrastate possession and consumption of marijuana for medical purposes as authorized under California law, the Supreme Court hollowed out the core of contemporary commerce clause jurisprudence. Insofar as United States v. Morrison had stood for the propositions that only intrastate economic activities could be aggregated for purposes of the "substantial effects" test, that attenuated connections between …

Go to article