Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Presidential Succession And Disability: Marking The 50th Anniversary Of The 25th Amendment, John D. Feerick, Joel K. Goldstein, John Rogan, Robert J. Reilly
Presidential Succession And Disability: Marking The 50th Anniversary Of The 25th Amendment, John D. Feerick, Joel K. Goldstein, John Rogan, Robert J. Reilly
Joel K. Goldstein, J.D.
Discussion with Dean John Feerick and Joel Goldstein (St. Louis University School of Law), Fordham University School of Law, February 3, 2017. This event marked the fiftieth anniversary of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment's ratification. Moderated by John Rogan. Introduction by Dean Robert Reilly. Program of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment Series.
Symposium: The Adequacy Of The Presidential Succession System In The 21st Century, Part 3, Joel K. Goldstein, John D. Feerick, Benton Becker, James E. Fleming, Birch Bayh, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Symposium: The Adequacy Of The Presidential Succession System In The 21st Century, Part 3, Joel K. Goldstein, John D. Feerick, Benton Becker, James E. Fleming, Birch Bayh, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Joel K. Goldstein, J.D.
Symposium. Panel: Joel K. Goldstein, Dean John D. Feerick, Benton Becker, James E. Fleming, and Senator Birch Bayh. Moderated by Robert Kaczorowski. Fordham University School of Law, April 16, 2010. Aired on C-SPAN.
Gerrymandering And Conceit: The Supreme Court's Conflict With Itself, Mckay Cunningham
Gerrymandering And Conceit: The Supreme Court's Conflict With Itself, Mckay Cunningham
McKay Cunningham
In November 2016, a federal court struck as unconstitutional Wisconsin’s redistricting map under both the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause. The court’s decision in Whitford v. Gill marks the first time a federal court invalidated a redistricting map as unconstitutional for partisan gerrymandering in over thirty years. Wisconsin has appealed the decision to the United States Supreme Court, which recently granted review. The Supreme Court has long held that extreme partisan gerrymandering violates equal protection but has simultaneously refused to determine the merits of gerrymandering disputes, instead labeling them as non-justiciable political questions. In particular, the Court has …
The Amendment Effect, Jonathan L. Marshfield
The Amendment Effect, Jonathan L. Marshfield
Jonathan Marshfield