Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (43)
- Criminal Procedure (8)
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Courts (6)
- Torts (6)
-
- Business Organizations Law (5)
- Civil Law (5)
- Property Law and Real Estate (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- International Law (4)
- Conflict of Laws (3)
- European Law (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Business (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Military, War, and Peace (2)
- Other Law (2)
- Religion Law (2)
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (11)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (10)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (7)
- Fordham Law School (6)
- Pepperdine University (4)
-
- University of South Carolina (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- United Arab Emirates University (1)
- Universitas Indonesia (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Indiana Law Journal (10)
- Villanova Law Review (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- William & Mary Law Review (4)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (3)
-
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (2)
- South Carolina Law Review (2)
- St. John's Law Review (2)
- The International Lawyer (2)
- William & Mary Business Law Review (2)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (1)
- Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Journal (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Cornell International Law Journal (1)
- International Journal of Legal Information (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (1)
- Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business (1)
- San Diego International Law Journal (1)
- South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business (1)
- UAEU Law Journal (1)
- University of San Francisco Law Review (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 60
Full-Text Articles in Law
Surprises In The Skies: Resolving The Circuit Split On How Courts Should Determine Whether An "Accident" Is "Unexpected Or Unusual" Under The Montreal Convention, Ashley Tang
Washington Law Review
Article 17 of both the Montreal Convention and its predecessor, the Warsaw Convention, imposes liability onto air carriers for certain injuries and damages from “accidents” incurred by passengers during international air carriage. However, neither Convention defines the term “accident.” While the United States Supreme Court opined that, for the purposes of Article 17, an air carrier’s liability “arises only if a passenger’s injury is caused by an unexpected or unusual event or happening that is external to the passenger,” it did not explain what standards lower courts should employ to discern whether an event is “unexpected or unusual.” In 2004, …
Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Mekanisme Gugatan Warga Negara (Citizen Lawsuit) Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat, Listyalaras Nurmedina
Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Mekanisme Gugatan Warga Negara (Citizen Lawsuit) Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat, Listyalaras Nurmedina
"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI
A citizen lawsuit is a lawsuit filed by citizens against state officials that cause negligence and cause losses. This negligence is an act against the law (onrechtmatige overhead daad), where the state is ordered to improve its performance and issue a policy for general governing policies (regeling). It is intended to ensure that the negligence that previously occurred will not be repeated. A citizen lawsuit is almost similar to a class action lawsuit because it has the same thing, namely that the lawsuit is filed involving the interests of many people represented by one or more people. The difference is …
Separate And Unequal: Promoting Racial Equity In Public Schools In The United States And South Africa, Paige Sferrazza
Separate And Unequal: Promoting Racial Equity In Public Schools In The United States And South Africa, Paige Sferrazza
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
On January 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States announced that it will hear two cases, against Harvard College and the University of North Carolina, which “rais[e] serious doubts about the future of affirmative action in higher education.” The plaintiff in both cases, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (“SFFA”), is a non-profit organization devoted to eradicating affirmative action programs nationwide. Described as the “culmination of a years-long strategy by conservative activists,” these cases represent the first affirmative action challenges to be argued before the Court’s new conservative majority, where they “pose the gravest threats yet” to over …
An Innovative Framework: Evaluating The New German Business Stabilization And Restructuring Law (Starug), Andreas Rauch
An Innovative Framework: Evaluating The New German Business Stabilization And Restructuring Law (Starug), Andreas Rauch
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
This comment examines the restructuring framework, restrukturierungsgesetz (“StaRUG”), and argues that this new law represents an effective—albeit radical—departure from Germany’s previous, conservative insolvency regime. Passed in response to a 2019 EU Directive aimed at modernizing restructuring law Union-wide, and integrated into the German legal system against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, StaRUG and its ancillary reforms in other areas of German law create a restructuring proceeding that places a premium on a debtor’s continued business operations. Thus, in a striking shift from the traditional German approach to business distress, which strongly emphasized creditor rights, the new StaRUG focuses on …
Shape Mark (Trade Dress) Distinctiveness: A Comparative Inquiry Into U.S. And E.U. Trademark Law, Qadir Qeidary
Shape Mark (Trade Dress) Distinctiveness: A Comparative Inquiry Into U.S. And E.U. Trademark Law, Qadir Qeidary
William & Mary Business Law Review
Nowadays, the increasing application of visual elements, as non-traditional trademarks, to convey commercial information has brought about some new challenges to pioneer legal systems. In this regard, the question of shape marks’ (trade dress) distinctiveness has also caused some hot debates in U.S. and EU trademark law. Indeed, the most challenging legal question before those legal jurisdictions is about the method of transplanting the concept of trademark distinctiveness into the mechanism through which shape marks, as visual mediums, perform a trademark communicative function. Technically, the indefinite nature of shape marks or trade dress marks and lack of a definitive or …
Black Lives Matter Abroad, Too: Proposed Solutions To The Racialized Policing Of Ethiopian Jews In Israel, Samy Abdallah
Black Lives Matter Abroad, Too: Proposed Solutions To The Racialized Policing Of Ethiopian Jews In Israel, Samy Abdallah
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
This Note will first discuss the presence of Ethiopian Jews in Israel, and then compare their stature and rights (or lack thereof) to another insular group in Israel—Arab Palestinians. Finally, this Note will discuss possible solutions and remedies to these fatal police shootings. Considering that the possibility of criminal liability for officers is low, this Note will argue that both civil remedies and additional training for police are necessary to avert future shootings of Ethiopian Jews.
Who Will Save The Redheads? Towards An Anti-Bully Theory Of Judicial Review And Protection Of Democracy, Yaniv Roznai
Who Will Save The Redheads? Towards An Anti-Bully Theory Of Judicial Review And Protection Of Democracy, Yaniv Roznai
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Democracy is in crisis throughout the world. And courts play a key role within this process as a main target of populist leaders and in light of their ability to hinder administrative, legal, and constitutional changes. Focusing on the ability of courts to block constitutional changes, this Article analyzes the main tensions situated at the heart of democratic erosion processes around the world: the conflict between substantive and formal notions of democracy; a conflict between believers and nonbelievers that courts can save democracy; and the tension between strategic and legal considerations courts consider when they face pressure from political branches. …
The Protection Of Free Choice And The Right To Passivity: Applying The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination To Physical Examinations And Documents' Submission, Rinat Kitai-Sangero
The Protection Of Free Choice And The Right To Passivity: Applying The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination To Physical Examinations And Documents' Submission, Rinat Kitai-Sangero
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Article addresses the question of whether the privilege against selfincrimination should cover physical examinations as well as the obligation to submit documents. This question requires a serious examination of the justifications underlying the privilege against self-incrimination and is of particular relevance in the current age of technological progress that expands the powers assigned to law enforcement agencies to access knowledge and thoughts stored in individuals’ minds. After addressing the comparative law regarding the applicability of the privilege against selfincrimination to physical examinations and to the obligation to submit documents and discussing key justifications for the privilege against self-incrimination, dividing …
Offer And Acceptance In Jordanian Civil Law And Comparative Law: The Concept And Its Development
Offer And Acceptance In Jordanian Civil Law And Comparative Law: The Concept And Its Development
UAEU Law Journal
Islamic jurisprudence "fiqh" was the first legal system which adopted the doctrine of offer and acceptance. It is thought that the doctrine had been imported to French legal system from Islamic Fiqh through Spain and then transmitted to English law.
As we have seen, all the legal systems which have been studied are in common on the question of determination of offer and acceptance. This determination is based on a chronologically sequential order: the first expression of one party's will is an offer while the second corresponding expression of the other party's will is an acceptance. Nevertheless, all these systems …
Reasonable Action: Reproductive Rights, The Free Exercise Clause, And Religious Freedom In The United States And The Republic Of Ireland, Liam Ray
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
This Note will argue that by denying certiorari in Stormans v. Wiesman, the Supreme Court missed an important opportunity to provide guidance to the states as to how the Free Exercise Clause applies to the kind of stocking and dispensing regulations adopted by the State of Washington. This Note will further argue from a policy perspective that the approach to these kinds of regulations adopted by the Republic of Ireland (“ROI”) presents the best approach for states to adopt because it provides a balance in terms of respecting the free exercise rights of pharmacists and pharmacy owners with …
Dignity Takings In Communist Poland: Collectivization And Slave Soldiers, Ewa Kozerska, Piotr Stec
Dignity Takings In Communist Poland: Collectivization And Slave Soldiers, Ewa Kozerska, Piotr Stec
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Poland’s history in the 20th century could be a swell script of a movie. A country that had lost its independence in the 18th century regained it in 1918 only to fall prey to Nazi Germany twenty years later. After World War II Poland was under Communist rule that ended in 1989 with the fall of the Iron Curtain. In this paper we deal with dignity takings as defined by Professor Bernadette Atuahene that took place mostly in the early phase of the Communist era.
Creation of the Communist “brave new world” required total transformation of the society, sometimes referred …
Corporate Culture And Competition Compliance In East Asia, Jingyuan Ma, Mel Marquis
Corporate Culture And Competition Compliance In East Asia, Jingyuan Ma, Mel Marquis
South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business
No abstract provided.
A Comparative Look At Plea Bargaining In Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, And The United States, Carol A. Brook, Bruno Fiannaca, David Harvey, Paul Marcus, Jenny Mcewan, Renee Pomerance
A Comparative Look At Plea Bargaining In Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, And The United States, Carol A. Brook, Bruno Fiannaca, David Harvey, Paul Marcus, Jenny Mcewan, Renee Pomerance
William & Mary Law Review
In a world where the vast majority of criminal cases are resolved through some means other than the popularly depicted criminal trial, it is fundamental to a comprehensive understanding of comparative criminal procedure to study and appreciate the different mechanisms for criminal case resolution in different nations. This Article developed through a series of conversations (and ultimately a panel discussion) between six international criminal justice professionals - practicing attorneys, scholars, and judges - regarding the nature and effects of plea bargaining (and its comparative substitutes) in their respective countries. Providing a comparative look at different mechanisms for criminal case resolution, …
Plea Bargaining And Disclosure In Germany And The United States: Comparative Lessons, Jenia I. Turner
Plea Bargaining And Disclosure In Germany And The United States: Comparative Lessons, Jenia I. Turner
William & Mary Law Review
This Article analyzes recent trends in plea bargaining and disclosure of evidence in Germany and the United States. Over the last two decades, a number of U.S. jurisdictions have adopted rules requiring broader and earlier discovery in criminal cases. This development reflects a growing consensus that, in a system that resolves most of its cases through guilty pleas, early and extensive disclosure is necessary to ensure fair and informed outcomes.
The introduction of broader discovery in criminal cases in the United States aligns American rulesmore closely with longstanding German rules on access to the investigative file. At the same time, …
Recovering Judicial Integrity: Toward A Duty-Focused Disqualification Jurisprudence Based On Jewish Law, Shlomo Pill
Recovering Judicial Integrity: Toward A Duty-Focused Disqualification Jurisprudence Based On Jewish Law, Shlomo Pill
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Keeping The Status Quo: Why Continuing To Recognize The Presumption Of Irreparable Harm In False Comparative Advertising Protects The Market, Max Dillan
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
Legal action challenging a company’s advertisement for containing false or misleading statements is a more recent development in the American legal system. The market’s utilization of advertising to promote sales has grown steadily to the point where the frequency with which it now permeates everyday life is almost constant. Lawsuits challenging many of these advertisements have increased as well. The swelling influence of advertisements in the marketplace and the complementary rise in false advertising litigation is relevant for both companies and consumers alike. As litigation continues to grow as an outlet for companies to safeguard their brands, consumers will find …
Tax Anti-Avoidance Law In Australia And The United States, Susan C. Morse, Robert Deutsch
Tax Anti-Avoidance Law In Australia And The United States, Susan C. Morse, Robert Deutsch
The International Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Military Tribunals And Due Process In Post-Revolutionary Egypt, Bianca C. Isaias
Military Tribunals And Due Process In Post-Revolutionary Egypt, Bianca C. Isaias
The International Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Company Law In The European Union And The United States: A Comparative Analysis Of The Impact Of The Eu Freedoms Of Establishment And Capital And The U.S. Interstate Commerce Clause, Christoph Allmendinger
Company Law In The European Union And The United States: A Comparative Analysis Of The Impact Of The Eu Freedoms Of Establishment And Capital And The U.S. Interstate Commerce Clause, Christoph Allmendinger
William & Mary Business Law Review
Since the decision of the European Court of Justice in the Centros case, it has become popular in company law to draw comparisons between the United States economic constitution and the Single European Market. Since then, fears of a European “Delaware Effect,” which would create a “race to the bottom,” have hounded the debate on European company law. In this discussion, however, the unique constitutional framework of both the EU and the U.S. is seldom regarded. This constitutional framework, nevertheless, determines the behavior of both the legislators at state level and the market participants. This Article compares the impact of …
Sages, Savages, And Other Speech Act Communities: Culture In Comparative Law, Monica Eppinger
Sages, Savages, And Other Speech Act Communities: Culture In Comparative Law, Monica Eppinger
Saint Louis University Law Journal
This Article re-examines the possible utility of the concept of culture in comparative law. It reviews some limits and misuses of the concept of culture and introduces a components approach to using it in comparative analysis. First presented at a Symposium inspired by Laurence Tribe’s The Invisible Constitution, the Article takes up a key question emerging from Tribe’s work: How does a constitution constitute? Two conceptual tools from anthropology and sister disciplines, performative speech acts and performance theory, lend insight into how discourse produces literal meaning and, in parallel, produces and reproduces speech act communities. Having introduced a components …
Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal, Volume 1, William & Mary Law School
Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal, Volume 1, William & Mary Law School
Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Journal
Comparative Property Rights
October 14-15, 2011
Panel 1: Legal Protection of Property Rights: A Comparative Look
Panel 2: Reflections on Justice O'Connor's Important Property Rights Decisions
Panel 3: Property as an Instrument of Social Policy
Panel 4: Culture and Property
Panel 5: Property as an Economic Institution
Panel 6: Property Rights and the Environment
The Impact Of The Civil Jury On American Tort Law, Michael D. Green
The Impact Of The Civil Jury On American Tort Law, Michael D. Green
Pepperdine Law Review
This article, a contribution to a symposium on the what American tort law can contribute to the rest of the world expresses skepticism that a considerable swath of U.S. tort law would be of interest to the rest of the world. The thesis is that American tort law has been shaped by the existence of the civil jury, unique to the U.S, and areas of domestic tort law so influenced have no utility internationally. The article catalogues many such areas and discusses several of them.
What The United States Taught The Commonwealth About Pure Economic Loss: Time To Repay The Favor, Bruce Feldthusen
What The United States Taught The Commonwealth About Pure Economic Loss: Time To Repay The Favor, Bruce Feldthusen
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Searching For United States Tort Law In The Antipodes, Peter Cane
Searching For United States Tort Law In The Antipodes, Peter Cane
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
American Tort Law: Shining Beacon?, Allen Linden
American Tort Law: Shining Beacon?, Allen Linden
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Two Paths To Judicial Power: The Basic Structure Doctrine And Public Interest Litigation In Comparative Perspective, Manoj Mate
San Diego International Law Journal
This Article analyzes two key critical moments in the empowerment of the Supreme Court of India--the assertion of the basic structure doctrine, in which the Court asserted that constitutional amendments may be held unconstitutional on substantive grounds, and the development of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) regime, through which the Court sought to protect and promote the rule of law and assume an expanded role in governance. I argue, in this article, that these two moments are exemplars of two types of moments that capture distinct aspects of the role of courts in different polities--"constitutional entrenchment" and "judicialization of governance" …
Prosecutors As Judges, Erik Luna, Marianne Wade
Prosecutors As Judges, Erik Luna, Marianne Wade
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Policy, Perspective, And The Proxy Will, Ralph C. Brashier
Policy, Perspective, And The Proxy Will, Ralph C. Brashier
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
On The Role And Regulation Of Private Negotiations In Governance, Joseph W. Yockey
On The Role And Regulation Of Private Negotiations In Governance, Joseph W. Yockey
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Approaching Comparative Company Law , David C. Donald
Approaching Comparative Company Law , David C. Donald
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
No abstract provided.