Law Commons^™

A New Look At The Original Meaning Of The Diversity Clause, Mark Moller

College of Law Faculty

Must a federal court obtain the power to bind a party before her citizenship becomes relevant to diversity jurisdiction under Article III? For a long time conventional wisdom has assumed the answer is "no": Article III allows Congress to authorize diversity jurisdiction based on the citizenship of persons beyond a court's power to bind at the time jurisdiction is tested. Congress, in turn, has acted on this assumption. Key provisions of the most ambitious, and controversial, expansion of diversity jurisdiction in the last decade, the 2005 Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), hinge diversity jurisdiction on the citizenship of persons conventionally …

A New Look At The Original Meaning Of The Diversity Clause, Mark K. Moller

Mark Moller

Premature Burial? The Resuscitation Of Public Nuisance Litigation, Richard Faulk, John Gray

Richard Faulk

On Sept. 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co., held that federal common-law nuisance suits can proceed against major greenhouse gas emitters. Nine days later, a federal trial court reached the opposite conclusion in another case. In this article, attorneys Richard Faulk and John Gray discuss these rulings, and the revival of public nuisance litigation.

How Many Plaintiffs Are Enough? Venue In Title Vii Class Actions, Piper Hoffman

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Article critiques the recent rash of federal district court opinions holding that all named plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 must satisfy the venue requirements in the court where they filed the action. Neither the text nor the history of Title VII requires this prevailing interpretation; to the contrary, requiring every named plaintiff to satisfy venue requirements in the same court undermines the legislative purpose behind both Title VII and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 by creating a new obstacle to employees seeking to enforce …

The Expanding Use Of The Alien Tort Statute In International Human Rights Enforcement, Richard O. Faulk

Richard Faulk

This article examines the historical foundations of the ATS, the complexities of its recent interpretations. It then weighs the utility of the Act as a means for enforcing international human rights in the courts, and examines the risks posed by current trends to those who increasingly pursue international business opportunities. As will be seen, the boundaries of the ATS are inadequately defined, and there are dangerous opportunities for common law mischief and abuse. Precautions are obviously necessary, and the trend toward internationalism in United States jurisprudence suggests that even greater risks lie ahead.