Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The October 1992 Supreme Court Term And Antitrust: More Objectivity Than Ever, Stephen Calkins
The October 1992 Supreme Court Term And Antitrust: More Objectivity Than Ever, Stephen Calkins
Law Faculty Research Publications
Time and again the Rehnquist Court has favored antitrust certainty. When faced with a choice between achieving individualized justice and adhering to relatively clear, generalized rules, it has usually chosen the latter. The certainty of objective evidence has been preferred to the more customized resort to subjective evidence.
This pattern continued during the 1992-93 term. Perceived objectivity through generalized rules triumphed in the term's four antitrust cases, Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California, and Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco …
Supreme Court Antitrust 1991-92: The Revenge Of The Amici, Stephen Calkins
Supreme Court Antitrust 1991-92: The Revenge Of The Amici, Stephen Calkins
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
The 1990-91 Supreme Court Term And Antitrust: Toward Greater Certainty, Stephen Calkins
The 1990-91 Supreme Court Term And Antitrust: Toward Greater Certainty, Stephen Calkins
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Does A Monopolist Have A Duty To Deal With Its Rivals? Some Thoughts On The Aspen Skiing Case, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Does A Monopolist Have A Duty To Deal With Its Rivals? Some Thoughts On The Aspen Skiing Case, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Consent Decree In Antitrust Enforcement--Analysis And Criticism, J. Dennis Hynes
The Consent Decree In Antitrust Enforcement--Analysis And Criticism, J. Dennis Hynes
Publications
No abstract provided.