Law Commons^™

Fourth-Generation Environmental Law: Integrationist And Multimodal, Craig Anthony (Tony) Arnold

Craig Anthony (Tony) Arnold

Is The Attorney-Client Privilege A Privilege Of The Rich? Federal Hmis Database Reporting And Homeless Client Confidentiality, Jennifer Hammitt

Jennifer Hammitt

The Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) is a new database reporting system mandated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to track the usage of HUD services by homeless people. The HMIS requires collecting identifiable personal information about the individuals who use the services and entering that information into a database that enables information sharing and referral services. This comment arose out of an investigation into the HMIS database and confidentiality issues that I did while working at Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc., as part of the Homeless Legal Assistance Project in the summer of 2009. As this …

Good Deficits: Protecting The Public Interest From Deficit Hysteria, Neil H. Buchanan

Neil H. Buchanan

President Obama has come under increasingly fierce criticism for the size of the federal budget deficit, as both Democratic and Republican politicians loudly proclaim that federal spending should be cut. This article explains why such anti-deficit fervor is misguided and simplistic, and why, perhaps counter-intuitively, cutting government spending can hurt the country, rather than help it, in both the short run and the long run.

In the short run, cutting deficit spending can be disastrous to the economy, especially if the economy is already in decline. In addition, because the federal budget fails to separate spending that provides long-term benefits …

Algunos Apuntes Sobre Las Relaciones Entre El Derecho Administrativo Economico Y El Concepto Anglosajon De La Regulacion, Ramon Huapaya Jr.

Ramon Huapaya Jr.

Se trata de una investigación en la cual se compara el paralelo de las experiencias entre el Derecho Administrativo Económico y el concepto anglosajón de la Regulación, mostrando las coincidencias de los sistemas continentales y anglosajones de intervención administrativa en la economía.

Delivering The Goods: Herein Of Mead, Delegations, And Authority, Patrick Mckinley Brennan

Patrick McKinley Brennan

This paper argues, first, that the natural law position, according to which it is the function of human law and political authorities to instantiate certain individual goods and the common good of the political community, does not entail judges' having the power or authority to speak the natural law directly. It goes on to argue, second, that lawmaking power/authority must be delegated by the people or their representatives. It then argues, third, that success in making law depends not just on the exercise of delegated power/authority, but also on the exercise of care and deliberation or, in the article's terms, …

Out With A Bang: The Collapse Of Yucca Mountain Signals The Rise Of The New U.S. Cooperative Federalism Nuclear Reprocessing Model, Stefani C. Norrbin, Faye E. Jones

Faye E Jones

This Article argues that after the collapse of Yucca Mountain, the U.S. should move away from direct disposal by creating a new government backed, state-run corporation modeled after France’s Areva, to implement nuclear reprocessing in the U.S. This new model will help address the currently bankrupt nuclear waste system in the U.S. by using the money from the Nuclear Waste Fund that was collected for Yucca Mountain to provide financial support to states for nuclear reprocessing projects. Further, by working together, we can promote competition and innovation through state-run corporations backed by federal funding. In order to make the initial …

No Innocents Here: Using Litigation To Fight Against The Costs Of Universal Service In France, Dorit Reiss

Dorit R. Reiss

Liberalization of utility sectors may bring the benefits of competition to customers, but it also creates risks of manipulation of the new system by powerful industrial actors. Litigation is one tool available to undermine or delay effective regulation. In 2001 the European Court of Justice declared the French system of funding universal service in telecommunications untreaty, and ordered France to redesign it. The commission and observers understood the case as a triumph of open market over France’s narrow protection of the "national champion" French Télécom. An alternative interpretation that fits the data better describes the story as successful use of …

Fcc V. Fox Television Stations, Inc. : Towards An Even More Deferential Judiciary?, Alan Moe

Alan W Moe Jr

Censorship has always been a polemical area of constitutional law. The controversy is further amplified when administrative agencies deal with sensitive areas of constitutional liberties. In FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 1800, 1807 (2009), the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with an important issue of constitutional law and its intersection with the standard of judicial review for administrative agencies’ actions. In this case, the Court upheld the Federal Communications Commission’s about-face on its relatively conservative approach to the censorship of broadcasts for reasons of indecency in 2004. The FCC applied against Fox Television Stations its new policy of …

Industry Dominance In Publicly Important Rulemakings: An Empirical Study Of Epa’S Hazardous Air Pollutant Rules, Wendy E. Wagner

Wendy E. Wagner

This study challenges the conventional wisdom that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rulemakings are generally subjected to robust pluralistic processes by a diverse group of affected parties. The study tests for imbalance in interest group participation and influence (primarily between industry and environmental groups) in a complete set of highly technical and complex EPA pollution control rules governing hazardous air pollutant emissions. Imbalanced participation is assessed at three separate stages of the rulemaking life cycle – before the proposed rule is published, between notice and comment and the final rule, and after the final rule is published. The results reveal imbalances …

Is The United States Tax Court Exempt From Administrative Law Jurisprudence When Acting As A Reviewing Court?, Diane Fahey

Diane L. Fahey

To maintain legitimacy and stability, a government must have access to a reliable source of revenue. Taxes are the lifeblood that sustains a government. Therefore, as far back as 1931, the United States Supreme Court has enforced the principle that the executive branch of the federal government must be unimpaired in its ability to collect taxes owed; otherwise, the government could be undermined by citizens who attempt to delay or evade their obligation to pay taxes.

Taxpayers have always been permitted to dispute the amount of their liability; however, until recently, taxpayers had little opportunity to dispute the method employed …

Insurance As A Mitigation Mechanism: Managing International Greenhouse Gas Emissions Through Nationwide Mandatory Climate Change Catastrophe Insurance, Anastasia M. Telesetsky

Anastasia M Telesetsky

This paper proposes mandatory climate change catastrophe insurance as a risk-sharing mechanism to distribute future climate change disaster relief costs between major greenhouse gas emitting industries and the government. This article argues that mandatory catastrophe risk insurance for major greenhouse gas emitters will deliver necessary financial coverage for future climate disasters as well as compel timely climate change mitigation on the part of major emitters. The first part of this paper offers mandatory climate change catastrophe insurance as an additional market tool to the existing proposals for emission trading schemes and carbon taxes. This part begins with a summary of …

Improving The Fda Approval Process, Anup Malani

Anup Malani

The FDA employs an average-patient standard when reviewing drugs: it approves a drug only if is safe and effective for the average patient in a clinical trial. It is common, however, for patients to respond differently to a drug. Therefore, the average-patient standard can reject a drug that benefits certain patient subgroups (false negative) and even approval a drug that harms other patient subgroups (false positives). These errors increase the cost of drug development – and thus health care – by wasting research on unproductive or unapproved drugs. The reason why the FDA sticks with an average patient standard is …

A Law-Policy Proposal To Promote The Public Nature Of Science In An Era Of Academia-Industry Integration, Michael J. Malinowski

Michael J. Malinowski

This article addresses the impact of integration of academia, industry, and government on the public nature of research. The article concludes that, while the integration has benefited science immensely, regulatory measures should be taken to restore the public nature of research in an age of integration.

Legislative Rules, Nonlegislative Rules, And The Perils Of The Short Cut, David L. Franklin

David L. Franklin

Courts have long struggled to distinguish legislative rules, which are designed to have binding legal effect and must go through the rulemaking procedure known as notice and comment, from nonlegislative rules, which are not meant to have binding legal effect and are exempted from notice and comment. The distinction has been called “tenuous,” “baffling,” and “enshrouded in considerable smog.”

What is just as baffling is that prominent commentators such as John Manning, Peter Strauss, William Funk and Donald Elliot have proposed a simple solution to the problem—and courts have failed to take them up on it. Rather than inquiring into …

The Credit Repair Organizations Act: The Sleeping Giant, Justin Smith

Justin T Smith

Congress created the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA) to protect consumers from unscrupulous providers of credit repair. In the fifteen years since it was enacted, problems have arisen in its application as many of the key provisions of CROA were left undefined and what little case law that has developed has yet to form a coherent understanding of how CROA is to be read. This lack of predictability makes CROA an ineffective piece of legislation in that parties are unable to properly modify their behavior since they are not operating on known terms.

Just as CROA has been neglected by …

Regulatory Reform In The States: Lessons From New Jersey, Stuart Shapiro

Stuart Shapiro

While numerous examinations of the rulemaking process have occurred at the federal level, there is a dearth of studies about the effects of the proceduralization of the rulemaking process on state regulations. Our examination focuses on regulations promulgated in New Jersey, both prior to and following, major procedural changes enacted in the state in 2001. By choosing distinct leadership periods, one governed by Democrats and one by Republicans, we attempt to control for differences in political preferences for regulation. During the study years, we collected data on 1,707 regulations on a wide array of variables from the type of rulemaking, …

Barbara Lindemann & Paul Grossman, Employment Discrimination Law (Supp. 2009-10), Richard Gonzalez

Richard J. Gonzalez

No abstract provided.

The People's Agents And The Battle To Protect The American Public, Rena Steinzor, Sidney Shapiro

Rena I. Steinzor

Reasonable people disagree about the reach of the federal government, but there is near-universal consensus that it should protect us from such dangers as bacteria-infested food, harmful drugs, toxic pollution, crumbling bridges, and unsafe toys. And yet, the agencies that shoulder these responsibilities are in shambles; if they continue to decline, lives will be lost and natural resources will be squandered. In this timely book, Rena Steinzor and Sidney Shapiro take a hard look at the tangled web of problems that have led to this dire state of affairs.

It turns out that the agencies are not primarily to blame …

The Development Of Gender Within The Particular Social Group Definition Under The United Nations Refugee Convention And United States Immigration Law: Case Studies Of Female Asylum Seekers From Cameroon, Eritrea, Iraq And Somalia, T S. Twibell

Ty Twibell

The Veterans’ Judicial Review Act Twenty Years Later: Confronting The New Complexities Of Va Adjudication, James D. Ridgway

James D. Ridgway

When judicial review was introduced to the veterans benefits system twenty years ago, there was great concern that it would push the informal, “claimant friendly” process towards a much more adversarial model. Although judicial review has improved the system in many ways, the system continues to suffer from serious problems. Much of the discussion about the current problems facing the VA adjudication system accept the false premise that the system is struggling to find balance between a paternalistic charitable model and an adversarial entitlement model. This has obscured the true conflict within the system. In reality, the VA system has …

Seeing The State: Transparency As Metaphor, Mark Fenster

Mark Fenster