Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Place and Environment (2)
- Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies (2)
- Sociology (2)
- Alternative and Complementary Medicine (1)
-
- Christianity (1)
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Community Psychology (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Counseling Psychology (1)
- Education (1)
- Environmental Public Health (1)
- Environmental Studies (1)
- Ethnic Studies (1)
- Health Psychology (1)
- History (1)
- History of Religion (1)
- Holocaust and Genocide Studies (1)
- Human Ecology (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- Inequality and Stratification (1)
- International Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Legal (1)
- Keyword
-
- 1619 Project (1)
- Academic freedom (1)
- Backlash (1)
- Book banning (1)
- Christian (1)
-
- Church (1)
- Counter narrative (1)
- Counter-storytelling (1)
- Court (1)
- Critical Race Theory (1)
- Crusades (1)
- Democracy (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Education (1)
- Genocide (1)
- Indian (1)
- Intersectionality (1)
- Kimberlé Crenshaw (1)
- Land (1)
- Law (1)
- M'Intosh (1)
- Mari Matsuda (1)
- Muscogee (1)
- Native American (1)
- Race (1)
- Racial reckoning (1)
- Racism (1)
- Slavery (1)
- Systemic racism (1)
- Trauma (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Loving Truly: An Epistemic Approach To The Doxastic Norms Of Love
Loving Truly: An Epistemic Approach To The Doxastic Norms Of Love
The International Journal of Ecopsychology (IJE)
If you love someone, is it good to believe better of her than epistemic norms allow? The partiality view says that it is: love, on this view, issues norms of belief that clash with epistemic norms. The partiality view is supposedly supported by an analogy between beliefs and actions, by the phenomenology of love, and by the idea that love commits us to the loved one’s good character. I argue that the partiality view is false, and defend what I call the epistemic view. On the epistemic view, love also issues norms of belief. But these say simply (and …
Our Silence Will Not Protect Us . . . And Neither Will J. Edgar Hoover: Reclaiming Critical Race Theory Under The New Mccarthyism, Christina Hsu Accomando, Kristin J. Anderson
Our Silence Will Not Protect Us . . . And Neither Will J. Edgar Hoover: Reclaiming Critical Race Theory Under The New Mccarthyism, Christina Hsu Accomando, Kristin J. Anderson
Humboldt Journal of Social Relations
The right-wing attack against critical race theory is the latest manufactured panic designed to whip up supporters of a party beholden to Donald Trump. Since late 2020, hundreds of measures have been introduced across the U.S. to ban antiracism education, critical race theory, the 1619 Project, and any understanding of racism as systemic and embedded in U.S. history and law. While an understandable reaction of educators is to declare that they are not teaching critical race theory, our position is to reclaim critical race theory for the powerful lens it offers in understanding the history of the U.S., the protracted …
Johnson V. M'Intosh: Christianity, Genocide, And The Dispossession Of Indigenous Peoples, Cynthia J. Boshell
Johnson V. M'Intosh: Christianity, Genocide, And The Dispossession Of Indigenous Peoples, Cynthia J. Boshell
Cal Poly Humboldt theses and projects
Using hermeneutical methodology, this paper examines some of the legal fictions that form the foundation of Federal Indian Law. The text of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1823 Johnson v. M’Intosh opinion is evaluated through the lens of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide to determine the extent to which the Supreme Court incorporated genocidal principles into United States common law. The genealogy of M’Intosh is examined to identify influences that are not fully apparent on the face of the case. International jurisprudential interpretations of the legal definition of genocide are summarized and used as …