Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Administrative Office of the Courts (1)
- Affirmative action plans in university admissions (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Communications decency act (1)
-
- Content creators (1)
- Court facilities (1)
- Court operations (1)
- Detention of noncitizens with criminal records (1)
- Digital privacy (1)
- Double jeopardy (1)
- Emergency preparedness (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal preemption (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- H1N1 (1)
- Ideology (1)
- Individual rights (1)
- Judicial guidance (1)
- Limiting the scope (1)
- Limiting voting rolls (1)
- Mainstream media (1)
- Natural rights (1)
- Non-natural rights (1)
- Pandemic (1)
- Preparedness planning (1)
- Refusing services based on religious beliefs (1)
- Remote justice (1)
- Roberto Rosas (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Abolishing The Communications Decency Act Might Sanitize "Political Biased," "Digitally Polluted," And "Dangerously Toxic" Social Media? - Judicial And Statistical Guidance From Federal-Preemption, Safe-Harbor And Rights-Preservation Decisions, Willy E. Rice
Faculty Articles
Sitting and former U.S. Presidents, as well as members of the general public, financial, political and educational institutions, use social media. Yet, an overwhelming majority of users, content creators, parents, "conservatives," "progressives," Democrats, and Republicans distrust social media owners. Some critics allege that owners "digitally pollute" platforms by encouraging users to post "corrosive, dangerous, toxic, and illegal content." Other critics assert that service providers' purportedly objective content moderation algorithms are biased-discriminating irrationally on the basis of users' political association, ideology, socioeconomic status, gender, and ethnicity. Republicans and Democrats have crafted roughly twenty bills on this matter. In theory, the enacted …
The Aoc In The Age Of Covid - Pandemic Preparedness Planning In The Federal Courts, Zoe Niesel
The Aoc In The Age Of Covid - Pandemic Preparedness Planning In The Federal Courts, Zoe Niesel
Faculty Articles
The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic created a crisis for American society—and the federal courts were not exempt. Court facilities came to a grinding halt, cases were postponed, and judiciary employees adopted work-from-home practices. Having court operations impacted by a pandemic was not a new phenomenon, but the size, scope, and technological lift of the COVID-19 pandemic was certainly unique.
Against this background, this Article examines the history and future of pandemic preparedness planning in the federal court system and seeks to capture some of the lessons learned from initial federal court transitions to pandemic operations in 2020. The Article begins by …
Evolution Of Legal Topics, Rights And Obligations In The United States, Roberto Rosas
Evolution Of Legal Topics, Rights And Obligations In The United States, Roberto Rosas
Faculty Articles
What new constitutional rights does the American Legal system have to offer? The United States Constitution is a document that continues to be interpreted every year. The Supreme Court hears recent cases with the purpose of interpreting the meaning of the Constitution. Since the creation of the Supreme Court, the Constitution has been analyzed in different ways – some interpretations lasting decades and some amendments going through changes depending on the different ideologies of the Justices on the Court.
This article discusses some of the rights established by the Supreme Court from 2016 to 2019 and provides the background as …