Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- 1965 Voting Rights Act (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Abortion and American Politics (1)
- Barbara Hinkson Craig (1)
-
- Bill Clinton (1)
- Book review (1)
- Bruce Lindsey (1)
- Consent Decrees (1)
- Constitutional Interpretation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- David M. O'Brien (1)
- Democratic Party (1)
- Executive Privilege (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Government Information (1)
- Government Policy (1)
- Judicial Activism (1)
- Judicial Power (1)
- Judicial Review (1)
- Judicial Statistics (1)
- Politics (1)
- Tom Delay (1)
- United States (1)
- Voting Rights Act (1)
- W&M Faculty (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Through The Looking Glass: What Abortion Teaches Us About American Politics, Neal Devins
Through The Looking Glass: What Abortion Teaches Us About American Politics, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
No abstract provided.
Tom Delay: Popular Constitutionalist?, Neal Devins
Tom Delay: Popular Constitutionalist?, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
No abstract provided.
The Federalism-Rights Nexus: Explaining Why Senate Democrats Tolerate Rehnquist Court Decision Making But Not The Rehnquist Court, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
No abstract provided.
Split Definitive, Lawrence Baum, Neal Devins
Split Definitive, Lawrence Baum, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
For the first time in a century, the Supreme Court is divided solely by political party.
Why Congress Does Not Challenge Judicial Supremacy, Neal Devins
Why Congress Does Not Challenge Judicial Supremacy, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
Members of Congress largely acquiesce to judicial supremacy both on constitutional and statutory interpretation questions. Lawmakers, however, do not formally embrace judicial supremacy; they rarely think about the courts when enacting legislation. This Article explains why this is so, focusing on why lawmakers have both strong incentive to acquiesce to judicial power and little incentive to advance a coherent view of congressional power. In particular, lawmakers are interested in advancing favored policies, winning reelection, and gaining personal power within Congress. Abstract questions of institutional power do not interest lawmakers and judicial defeats are seen as opportunities to find some other …
Diminished Luster In Escambia County?, Neal Devins
Diminished Luster In Escambia County?, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
No abstract provided.
The 1965 Voting Rights Act: Some Wrongs Still Not Righted, Neal Devins
The 1965 Voting Rights Act: Some Wrongs Still Not Righted, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
No abstract provided.
Bearing False Witness: The Clinton Impeachment And The Future Of Academic Freedom, Neal Devins
Bearing False Witness: The Clinton Impeachment And The Future Of Academic Freedom, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
No abstract provided.
A Loss Of Control: Privilege Cases Diminish Presidential Power, Neal Devins
A Loss Of Control: Privilege Cases Diminish Presidential Power, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
No abstract provided.