Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0947: John & Arlene Wehr V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Gulfport Energy Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0947: John & Arlene Wehr V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Gulfport Energy Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2014-471 (Gulfport Energy Corporation; Brown #9 Unit)
Appeal No. 0968: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0968: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-405, 2018-406, 2018-407, 2018-408, 2019-409
Appeal No. 0969: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0969: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-405, 2018-406, 2018-407, 2018-408, 2019-409
Appeal No. 0970: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0970: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-405, 2018-406, 2018-407, 2018-408, 2019-409
Appeal No. 0938: L.D. Jenking V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Gulfport Energy Coropration, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0938: L.D. Jenking V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Gulfport Energy Coropration, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-437 & Chief's Order 2016-451; Hogston C & A Unites (Gulfport Energy Corporation)
Appeal No. 0939: L.D. Jenking V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Gulfport Energy Coropration, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0939: L.D. Jenking V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Gulfport Energy Coropration, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-437 & Chief's Order 2016-451; Hogston C & A Unites (Gulfport Energy Corporation)
Appeal No. 0971: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0971: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-405, 2018-406, 2018-407, 2018-408, 2019-409
Appeal No. 0972: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0972: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-405, 2018-406, 2018-407, 2018-408, 2019-409
Appeal No. 0950: General Electric Company V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0950: General Electric Company V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-347
Appeal No. 0974: L.D. Jenkins V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0974: L.D. Jenkins V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2019-69 & 2019-77; Smith East Unit & Smith Unit (Chesapeake Exploration)
Appeal No. 0965: Brookfield Citizens Against Injection Wells, Et Al. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Highland Field Services, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0965: Brookfield Citizens Against Injection Wells, Et Al. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Highland Field Services, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-286; Highland Brookfield Well #5 (Highland Field Services, LLC)
Appeal No. 0973: L.D. Jenkins V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0973: L.D. Jenkins V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2019-69 & 2019-77; Smith East Unit & Smith Unit (Chesapeake Exploration)
Appeal No. 0915: Dynamerican, Llc, Et. Al V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And American Energy - Utica, Llc Nka Ascent Resources - Utica, Llc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0915: Dynamerican, Llc, Et. Al V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And American Energy - Utica, Llc Nka Ascent Resources - Utica, Llc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-47 (American Energy - Utica nka Ascent Resources - Utica; Henry LND GR Unit)
Appeal No. 0962: Jeffrey D. Kuster, On Behalf Of David Kuster, Deceased V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0962: Jeffrey D. Kuster, On Behalf Of David Kuster, Deceased V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-114
Appeal No. 0966: Hardesty Production V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0966: Hardesty Production V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-242
Delegation And Time, Jonathan H. Adler, Christopher J. Walker
Delegation And Time, Jonathan H. Adler, Christopher J. Walker
Faculty Publications
Most concerns about delegation are put in terms of the handover of legislative power to federal agencies and the magnitude of the legislative policy decisions made by such agencies. Likewise, most reform proposals, such as the Congressional Review Act and the proposed REINS Act, address these gap-filling, democratic-deficit concerns. The same is true of the judicially created non-delegation canons, such as the major questions doctrine and other clear-statement rules. This Article addresses a different, under-explored dimension of the delegation problem: the temporal complications of congressional delegation. In other words, broad congressional delegations of authority at one time period become a …