Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (9)
- New york (7)
- Supreme court (7)
- Court (5)
- Federal (5)
-
- New york state constitution (5)
- State (5)
- United states constitution (5)
- City (4)
- Civil procedure (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Double jeopardy (4)
- Due process (4)
- Appellate (3)
- Civil rights (3)
- Criminal law (3)
- Criminal procedure (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Fourteenth amendment (3)
- Mistrial (3)
- Prejudice (3)
- Civil law (2)
- Consent (2)
- Queens (2)
- Retrial (2)
- Traffic law (2)
- Vehicle (2)
- Alcohol (1)
- Appellate Division (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Due Process Supreme Court Rockland County
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Department
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division
Due Process Pringle V. Wolfe (Decided 28, 1996)
Due Process Pringle V. Wolfe (Decided 28, 1996)
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disciplinary Regulation Of Prosecutorial Discretion: What Would A Rule Look Like?, Samuel J. Levine
Disciplinary Regulation Of Prosecutorial Discretion: What Would A Rule Look Like?, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
This Essay is the third part of a larger project examining the potential role of professional discipline in the regulation and supervision of prosecutors’ charging decisions. The first two parts of the project argued that courts have both the authority and the ability to exercise effective disciplinary review of charging decisions through the adoption of ethics rules and their enforcement in the disciplinary process. This Essay takes the next step in the project, considering the nature of rules that courts might adopt, by exploring potential rules targeting two improprieties: arbitrary and capricious charging decisions, and discriminatory charging decisions.