Law Commons^™

A Look Back At Reed V. Town Of Gilbert, Newton M. Galloway, Steven L. Jones

Mercer Law Review

Three years have passed since the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated the Sign Code enacted by the Town of Gilbert, Arizona (the Town), and virtually every other sign ordinance enacted by local governments across the country. Reed v. Town of Gilbert arose when the Town determined that temporary signs advertising the place and time of the transient Sunday services conducted by the Good News Community Church (the Church), led by Pastor Clyde Reed, violated its Sign Code. The Church was cited for Sign Code violations, and the Church challenged the Sign Code on constitutional grounds in the United …

Admiralty, John P. Kavanagh Jr.

Mercer Law Review

The cases discussed herein represent decisions the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued in 2016 and 2017. While not an all-inclusive list of maritime decisions from the court during that timeframe, the Author identified and provided summaries of key rulings of interest to the maritime practitioner.

Bankruptcy, John T. Laney Iii, William J. Diehl

Mercer Law Review

This Article surveys opinions decided in 2017 that will impact bankruptcy law practice in the Eleventh Circuit. These decisions come from the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, United States District Courts, and Bankruptcy Courts. While courts in the Eleventh Circuit have addressed other important questions pertinent to bankruptcy law, this Article focuses on select decisions that the Authors believe will have the greatest impact on the readers' practices. The Article first updates cases cited in last year's annual survey. The Article continues by discussing cases involving bankruptcy courts' jurisdiction, …

Class Actions, Thomas M. Byrne, Stacey Mcgavin Mohr

Mercer Law Review

During 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit continued to address a familiar set of recurring issues in contemporary class action law, including the scope of jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), class action settlement controversies, and the impact of arbitration agreements on class actions.

Commercial Transportation, Madeline E. Mcneeley, Yvonne S. Godfrey, Andrew J. Conn, Stephen G. Lowry

Mercer Law Review

Commercial transportation involves all of the significant forms of passenger and property transportation across the United States. This Article covers four major areas: (1) trucking and commercial transit; (2) aviation; (3) limousines, taxis, and rideshare services; and (4) railroads. Most of these areas are subject to heavy federal regulation due to their involvement in and effect on interstate commerce. This Article surveys significant judicial, regulatory, and legislative developments in Eleventh Circuit commercial transportation law during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017.

Employment Discrimination, John E. Duvall

Mercer Law Review

Several interesting and noteworthy employment discrimination cases were on the docket of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit during the survey period, and one Supreme Court of the United States employment decision was announced during the period as well. The vast majority of the Eleventh Circuit's employment discrimination cases continue to be decided in unpublished opinions, most of which were per curiam opinions affirming grants of summary judgments to defendant employers. This year's Article is focused on reported decisions, commenting only on two unpublished decisions. In addition to the cases discussed in this Article, by the …

Environmental Law, Travis M. Trimble

Mercer Law Review

In 2017, district courts decided several issues that the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit had never addressed. The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia concluded that the Clean Water Act's (CWA) prohibition on the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States without a permit extended to discharges into groundwater with a "direct hydrological connection" to surface waters within the Act's scope. The court also concluded that a state-permitted land application system, whereby wastewater is sprayed onto fields as means of treatment and disposal, constituted a "point source" within the meaning …

Evidence, W. Randall Bassett, Val Leppert, Harris K. Howard

Mercer Law Review

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's 2017 term included important precedential opinions on a number of evidence topics. For example, in three published cases, the court again followed its trend of deferring to trial courts on the use of expert testimony, affirming all three in published opinions. The court also considered the interplay between a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to an effective cross-examination and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida's authority to limit the scope of cross-examination.

The court offered few significant opinions regarding the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. However, …

Healthcare Law, Kathryn S. Dunnam

Mercer Law Review

This Article serves as a review of significant healthcare developments in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit over the last two years and builds upon Mercer Law Review's last Healthcare Article in Volume 65. Specifically, this Article will cover cases dealing with physician speech, the False Claims Act, and the Medicare Secondary Payer Act.

Federal Income Taxation, Robert A. Beard, Gregory S. Lucas

Mercer Law Review

In 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and courts within its jurisdiction decided a number of important federal taxation cases. Among these are a case that raises novel constitutional arguments under the Equal Protection Clause, a case that lodges a constitutional challenge to the United States Tax Court, and a case that addresses a matter of first impression in the circuit about the deductibility of amounts paid in the context of a divorce proceeding. These three cases are discussed herein.

Trial Practice And Procedure, John O'Shea Sullivan, Tala Amirfazli, Adelyn B. Boleman

Mercer Law Review

The 2017 survey period yielded noteworthy decisions relating to federal trial practice and procedure in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, several of which involved issues of first impression. This Article analyzes recent developments in the Eleventh Circuit, including significant rulings in the areas of civil procedure, statutory interpretation, and federal subject-matter jurisdiction.

Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Thomas D. Church

Mercer Law Review

In 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit continued its efforts to untangle the complex web of laws known as the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The year saw a number of precedential decisions interpreting its provisions, including those governing specific offenses such as drug trafficking and fraud, as well as those setting forth the proper methodology for establishing a defendant's criminal history.

This Survey identifies and summarizes the important holdings from these decisions. Section II begins with the decisions reviewing an application of the Guidelines provisions for specific offenses, and the different enhancements available for certain classes …

First Rock To The West, Straight On 'Til Morning: Westrock Draws Potential Roadmap To Substantive Challenges Of Erisa Rehabilitation Plans Under Section 1132, Michael Berthiaume

Mercer Law Review

Since its enactment, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) has confused and frustrated practitioners, businesspeople, and citizens alike. This convoluted statute encompassing over 1,000 pages has become increasingly more difficult through several amendments as new Congresses continue to patch the statute and "kick the can" of retirement benefits to later sessions.

In WestRock RKT Co. v. Pace Industry Union Management Fund, WestRock RKT Company (WestRock), a contributing employer, brought an action against Pace Industry Union Management Fund (The Fund) arguing a violation under ERISA, which sets minimum standards for pension plans in private industries. WestRock pursued this action …

Labor And Employment Law, W. Jonathan Martin Ii, Patricia-Anne Upson

Mercer Law Review

This Article surveys the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit precedent from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. This Article focuses on case law concerning laws enforced by the United States Department of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board. The following is a discussion of those opinions.

Getting Schooled: The United States Court Of Appeals For The Eleventh Circuit Holds That The Federal Government Need Not Show "Good Cause" Before Settling And Dismissing A Pending Qui Tam Action Against College, Laura Leigh Fox

Mercer Law Review

In United States v. Everglades College, Inc., a case of first impression in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, the court interpreted the good cause intervention requirement of § 3730(c)(3) of Title 31 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The court was asked to determine whether the United States needed to show "good cause" for intervening in a qui tam action brought by two private individuals under the False Claims Act (FCA). The government, after originally declining to proceed with the FCA action itself, eventually decided to "intervene" while the action was pending on the …

Electronic Discovery, Alex Khoury, James R. Williams Jr.

Mercer Law Review

Cooperation, proportionality, and spoliation were the hot topics in electronic discovery in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 2017. Multiple courts joined in Chief Justice Roberts' plea for cooperation in e-Discovery in his 2015 Year End Report on the Federal Judiciary, with a few even requiring the parties and their attorneys to read the Report before bringing additional discovery motions. On the proportionality front, several courts used the proportionality factors to limit e-Discovery burdens imposed on small businesses. On the spoliation battlefield, e-Discovery sanctions continue to punish bad actors, but there has been a decrease …

The Right To Two Criminal Defense Lawyers, Bruce A. Green

Mercer Law Review

"What can courts, legislators, or criminal defense lawyers themselves do to seriously change criminal defense practice in a manner that significantly benefits criminal defendants and promotes justice?" That question was posed to the participants in an August 2017 SEALS discussion group and Mercer University School of Law's 2017 Symposium on "disruptive innovation in criminal defense." The implied premise of the question is that aspects of criminal defense should be fixed or can be improved-and in radical ways.

The question of disruptive innovation provides an occasion for identifying deficiencies and weaknesses in contemporary criminal defense practice, and because defense lawyers do …

Raising The Bar: Indigent Defense And The Right To A Partisan Lawyer, Steven Zeidman

Mercer Law Review

In Ake v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court of the United States held that an indigent defendant is entitled to the assistance of an expert in cases where it is established that mental health is at issue. Thirty-two years later, in McWilliams v. Dunn, the Court finally addressed whether an expert must be independent of the prosecution. During oral argument, counsel for McWilliams argued that Ake required that the expert must be part of the defense team and on the defendant's side. Justice Gorsuch, in only his second week on the Court, stated dubiously that if that were the …

Participatory Defense: Humanizing The Accused And Ceding Control To The Client, Cynthia Godsoe

Mercer Law Review

This contribution to the Mercer University School of Law's 2017 Symposium on Disruptive Innovation in Criminal Defense discusses two interrelated defense strategies: humanizing the accused and contextualizing their actions in a society plagued with racism and poverty, and ceding substantial control of the defense strategy and legwork to the accused, and their family and friends. The first strategy should not be, but is, disruptive; in a just (and sane?) criminal legal system, this would be a regular part of the process. In our current vast system of social control, however, focusing on the people in the system as anything other …

A Penal Colony For Bad Lawyers, Bennett L. Gershman

Mercer Law Review

The concept of "disruptive innovation" is vague. Imagining the idea of lawyer "disruption" might conjure a scene from Al Pacino's aggressive role in the 1979 film And Justice for All 9 or embody the tradition of lawyers courageously representing unpopular clients, sometimes placing their lives at risk in courtrooms and on streets. But the panel, I discovered, was more interested in the concept of disruption as descriptive of radical departures from conventional lawyering and conventional discipline.

Recently, as I walked along the narrow cobblestoned streets of Prague--the same streets that Franz Kafka traversed while he was consumed by thoughts of …

The Politics Of Ethics, Laurie L. Levensn

Mercer Law Review

Prosecutors hate being told what to do. As "ministers of justice," they feel imbued with a moral compass that rarely, if ever, needs tweaking by outsiders. Their mission to protect society and the Constitution provides sufficient guidance. Being told how to be "ethical" is downright insulting for attorneys who already perceive themselves as wearing the white hat. Efforts to create ethical standards to guide a prosecutor's work may be perceived as little more than an unnecessary intrusion upon the prosecutor's independence and personal sense of justice. For some prosecutors, it is unwarranted meddling into the prosecution's business. As former Attorney …

Privileging Public Defense Research, Janet Moore, Ellen Yaroshefsky, Andrew L.B. Davies

Mercer Law Review

Empirical research on public defense is a new and rapidly growing field in which the quality of attorney-client communication is emerging as a top priority. For decades, law has lagged behind medicine and other professions in the empirical study of effective communication. The few studies of attorney-client communication focus mainly on civil cases. They also tend to rely on role-playing by non-lawyers or on post hoc inquiries about past experiences. Direct observation by researchers of real-time defendant-defender communication offers advantages over those approaches, but injecting researchers into the attorney-client dyad is in tension with legal and ethical precepts that protect …

Disrupting Victim Exploitation, David A. Singleton

Mercer Law Review

Violent-crime survivors have powerful stories to tell. Prosecutors use these stories to convict the accused and advocate for harsh sentences. Legislators use these narratives to pass punitive sentencing measures locking away the convicted for increasing periods of time.

Though prosecutors and legislators serve the entire community, many present themselves as speaking for victims, particularly those who call themselves "tough on crime." But do the interests of those who advocate for punitive, retributive justice always align with those of crime victims? And when their respective interests diverge, is it exploitative for prosecutors and legislators to suggest that they represent the interests …

Disruptive Innovation In Criminal Defense: Demanding Corporate Criminal Trials, Ellen S. Podgor

Mercer Law Review

Perhaps the least sympathetic party in a corporate criminal matter is a corporate entity that has engaged in criminal conduct. If the corporation is large, subject to third party civil actions, and especially in an industry dependent upon a public perception of ethical behavior, a criminal indictment can destroy the entity, and few in society are likely to be concerned. To ameliorate the collateral consequences of an indictment, corporations are quick to cooperate with the government by signing onto non-prosecution, deferred prosecution, or plea agreements. The government secures a hefty fine and obtains from the entity the names and evidence …

Immigration Defense Waivers In Federal Criminal Plea Agreements, Donna Lee Elm, Susan R. Klein, Elissa C. Steglich

Mercer Law Review

Immigration policy is back on the American public's radar screen. The fields of immigration--a civil-law subject-and criminal law-a public-law subject-are quite distinct in both litigation practice and law school curricula. With exceptions along the U.S.--Mexican border, only in a small minority of federal cases do criminal attorneys need to know more than some very basic premises of immigration law. Aside from some very general information necessary for defense attorneys to provide adequate advisements according to Padilla v. Kentucky to their clients before entering guilty pleas and Continued Legal Education (CLE) training regarding what offenses have severe immigration consequences, the body …

The Bend At The End: What Lawyers Can Learn About Disruptions And Innovations In Criminal Defense Practice From Market Analysis, Donald F. Tibbs, Justin Hollinger

Mercer Law Review

In the world of stock market analysis, there is one certainty: the stock market is unpredictable. It acts with a will of its own, and despite experts' attempts at market forecast, no single person or machine can accurately predict the highs and lows of each day. Nonetheless, market experts extol new techniques; develop computer algorithms; and attach interesting monikers, such as Stochastics, MACD, and Bollinger Bands. But, in the end, they all succumb to the same rule: the unpredictability of the market suggests that no trading strategy is 100%, without fail, perfect every single trade.

That said, however, there is …

Lyrics For Lockups: Using Rap Lyrics To Prosecute In America, Briana Carter

Mercer Law Review

Bob Marley once sang, "I shot the sheriff, but I did not shoot the deputy." Yet, he never went to jail for shooting that sheriff (possibly because he did not shoot the deputy). Instead, this line became known as the starting phrase of one of his most popular songs. While it may make sense to some why Marley's lyrics were art and not a confession to shooting his hometown sheriff, in some states, an artist's lyrics can be used as evidence to prosecute. More specifically, states have differed on the admissibility of a rap artist's lyrics as evidence for prosecution. …

Black And White Make Gray: Common Cause V. Kemp, What's The Trigger For Purging Voters?, Caitlin Wise

Mercer Law Review

Imagine showing up to the voting poll, eager to vote and to show support for a candidate, and waiting in a long line, possibly in the cold. Then imagine handing your identification over only to be told you were not on the voter registration roll. This is what happened to 100,000 voters in the 2016 presidential primary election when they were purged from the voter registration rolls. Because of the voter purging, they were unable to cast their vote in a controversial and close election. ABC News reported many voters who were removed from voting registration rolls were from low-income …

United States V. Osman: Including Future Therapy Costs In Mandatory Restitution Awards Is The Growing Trend Among Circuits, But Is It Wise?, Mary Theresa Mahfoud

Mercer Law Review

Mandatory restitution awards for child victims of sex crimes and child pornography now include future therapy costs. This trend, while theoretically increasing the amount of restitution awarded to the victim, can have unintended harmful consequences. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. Osman, as a matter of first impression, upheld a restitution order under the Mandatory Restitution for Sexual Exploitation of Children Act (Mandatory Restitution Act) to include future therapy expenses.

William Edward Osman pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida to the possession, production, …

A Constitutional Counterpunch To Georgia's Anti-Slapp Statute, Nick Phillips, Ryan Pumpian

Mercer Law Review

A "Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation"-commonly referred to as a "SLAPP-is a lawsuit intended to chill free speech and healthy public debate and to otherwise intimidate people from speaking out on issues of public concern. True SLAPP suits strike at the heart of the United States and Georgia Constitutions, specifically the rights to free speech and to petition the government enshrined therein. In recent years, state legislatures, including the Georgia General Assembly, have attempted to ward off SLAPP suits through legislation-commonly referred to as "anti-SLAPP" statutes-aimed at the early dismissal of SLAPPs and the award of attorney's fees and costs …