Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (6)
- Supreme Court (5)
- California (3)
- Campus (2)
- Civil rights (2)
-
- College (2)
- Discrimination (2)
- Privacy (2)
- Race (2)
- Sexual assault (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- Technology (2)
- University (2)
- Women (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Academic institutions (1)
- Adjudication (1)
- Administrative law judges (1)
- Administrative proceedings (1)
- Admissions (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Anti-discrimination (1)
- Applications (1)
- Appointments clause (1)
- Article 3 (1)
- Article III (1)
- Augmented reality (1)
- Backdoor (1)
- California legislation (1)
- Child vaccination (1)
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
Criminals, Classrooms, And Kangaroo Courts: Why College Campuses Should Not Adjudicate Sexual Assault Cases, Ashley Sarkozi
Criminals, Classrooms, And Kangaroo Courts: Why College Campuses Should Not Adjudicate Sexual Assault Cases, Ashley Sarkozi
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of California's Mandatory Child Vaccination Law: California Courts Should Not Depart From Established Precedent, Stephanie Awanyai
In Defense Of California's Mandatory Child Vaccination Law: California Courts Should Not Depart From Established Precedent, Stephanie Awanyai
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
In the wake of the 2015 measles outbreak in California, California Senate Bill 277 (S.B. 277) was enacted. S.B. 277 repeals the personal belief exemption to California’s immunization requirement for children in public and private educational or child care facilities in the State. While S.B. 277 was enacted to prevent the spread of contagious diseases through mandatory vaccinations of school-aged children, there are objections to this approach. Parents who oppose S.B. 277 contend that S.B. 277 violates their federal and state constitutional rights to make medical decisions on behalf of their child, and infringes on their child’s fundamental state interest …
Ncaa: No Consequences Against Athletes, Catalina Kelly
Ncaa: No Consequences Against Athletes, Catalina Kelly
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gun Rights Or Gun Control? How California's Waiting Period Law Can Pave The Way To Increased Regulation, Natasha Tran
Gun Rights Or Gun Control? How California's Waiting Period Law Can Pave The Way To Increased Regulation, Natasha Tran
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Making Room For Juvenile Justice: The Supreme Court's Decision In Montgomery V. Louisiana, Chelsea S. Gumaer
Making Room For Juvenile Justice: The Supreme Court's Decision In Montgomery V. Louisiana, Chelsea S. Gumaer
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Decrypting The Fourth Amendment: Applying Fourth Amendment Principles To Evolving Privacy Expectations In Encryption Technologies, Candice Gliksberg
Decrypting The Fourth Amendment: Applying Fourth Amendment Principles To Evolving Privacy Expectations In Encryption Technologies, Candice Gliksberg
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Special Education In Adult Correctional Facilities: A Right Not A Privilege, Melissa Edelson
Special Education In Adult Correctional Facilities: A Right Not A Privilege, Melissa Edelson
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
A general diffusion of knowledge and intelligence being essential to the preservation of the rights and liberties of the people, the Legislature shall encourage by all suitable means the promotion of intellectual, scientific, moral, and agricultural improvement. – California Constitution art. IX §1.
Returning To Roe: The Renewed Promise Of Whole Woman's Health, Cristina Salcedo
Returning To Roe: The Renewed Promise Of Whole Woman's Health, Cristina Salcedo
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Supremacy In A Time Of Turmoil: James V. City Of Boise, Richard Henry Seamon
Supreme Court Supremacy In A Time Of Turmoil: James V. City Of Boise, Richard Henry Seamon
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Last Term’s decision in James v. City of Boise encapsulates the current civil rights turmoil and the legal system’s inadequate response to it. In James ̧ the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a decision in which the Idaho Supreme Court (1) awarded attorney’s fees against a civil rights plaintiff despite her credible claim of excessive police force and (2) denied that it was bound by U.S. Supreme Court decisions interpreting the federal statute authorizing the award. Although the Court in James reaffirmed the state courts’ well-settled duty to obey the Court’s decisions on federal law, this article shows that the duty …
Race, Redistricting, And The Manufactured Conundrum, Justin Levitt
Race, Redistricting, And The Manufactured Conundrum, Justin Levitt
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Race and redistricting each lie at the core of recurring contests over American political identity. It is therefore perhaps no surprise that cases concerning the role of race in redistricting have offered the Supreme Court a steady diet. In 2017, for the fourth time in four decades, the Court struck North Carolina districts based on the legislature’s misuse of race. And the North Carolina legislature, proclaiming the whole business too complicated, simply threw up its hands.
This petulance is likely performance. The law of race and redistricting is resistant to shortcuts and stereotypes, but that does not render it intractable, …
Spokeo Misspeaks, Lauren E. Willis
Spokeo Misspeaks, Lauren E. Willis
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Most commentators have critiqued the Supreme Court’s opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins for failing to answer the question presented. But in important ways, the Spokeo opinion does not merely fail to speak—it affirmatively misspeaks. This essay suggests that underlying the Justices’ inability to see how standing law ought to apply to the facts in Spokeo is a failure to appreciate the power that consumer reports have over individuals’ life prospects today. Worse, the Justices’ unawareness of their own ignorance leads them to afford Congress little deference in identifying injuries occurring in our new information society. Their meta-ignorance also induces …
Ensuring The Constitution Remains Color Blind Vs. Turning A Blind Eye To Justice: Equal Protection And Affirmative Action In University Admissions, Attashin Safari
Ensuring The Constitution Remains Color Blind Vs. Turning A Blind Eye To Justice: Equal Protection And Affirmative Action In University Admissions, Attashin Safari
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Women-Only Ridesharing In America: Rising Sexual Assault Rates Demand An Exception To Anti-Discrimination Laws, Cristina Medina
Women-Only Ridesharing In America: Rising Sexual Assault Rates Demand An Exception To Anti-Discrimination Laws, Cristina Medina
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Counteracting Diminished Privacy In An Augmented Reality: Protecting Geolocation Privacy, Diana Martinez
Counteracting Diminished Privacy In An Augmented Reality: Protecting Geolocation Privacy, Diana Martinez
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lucia V. Sec: The Debate And Decision Concerning The Constitutionality Of Sec Administrative Proceedings, Elizabeth Wang
Lucia V. Sec: The Debate And Decision Concerning The Constitutionality Of Sec Administrative Proceedings, Elizabeth Wang
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.