Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Judges (2)
- Legal writing (2)
- 11th International Contracts Conference (1)
- Advice (1)
- Alito (1)
-
- Appeal (1)
- Appealing (1)
- Appellate court (1)
- Appellate practice (1)
- Appellate process (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Arbitration clauses (1)
- CFPB (1)
- Class action bans (1)
- Concurrence (1)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Federal court of appeals (1)
- Financial service industry (1)
- Financial services companies (1)
- Individualized arbitration (1)
- Judge (1)
- Judicial opinions (1)
- Judicial workload (1)
- Justice Alito (1)
- K-CON (1)
- K-CON XI (1)
- Legal profession (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Litigation techniques (1)
- Nonpublished opinions (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Attracting Undue Scrutiny On Appeal: An Appellate Judge's Perspective, Marshall L. Davidson Iii
Attracting Undue Scrutiny On Appeal: An Appellate Judge's Perspective, Marshall L. Davidson Iii
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Truth (Of The Matter Asserted) Is Out There: Law And The Paranormal Outside The First Amendment, Christopher L. Henry
The Truth (Of The Matter Asserted) Is Out There: Law And The Paranormal Outside The First Amendment, Christopher L. Henry
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deciding Not To Decide: A Limited Defense Of The Silent Concurrence, Alexander I. Platt
Deciding Not To Decide: A Limited Defense Of The Silent Concurrence, Alexander I. Platt
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Persuading With Precedent: Understanding And Improving Analogies In Legal Argument, Jacob M. Carpenter
Persuading With Precedent: Understanding And Improving Analogies In Legal Argument, Jacob M. Carpenter
Faculty Publications
When writing persuasive briefs, attorneys use comparisons — metaphors or case-based analogies — to help explain their analyses and support their positions. But attorneys use the two types of comparisons for very different purposes. Several legal scholars have explored how attorneys use metaphors in their legal writing. While the existing scholarship on legal metaphors is excellent, it is not sufficient to properly understand how to best draft case-based analogies. Unfortunately, case-based analogies have been surprisingly understudied despite their critical role in persuasive legal briefs. Not surprisingly, many attorneys are unaware of how far short their analogies fall from reaching their …
Writing In Law Reviews, Bar Association Journals, And Blogs (Part I), Douglas E. Abrams
Writing In Law Reviews, Bar Association Journals, And Blogs (Part I), Douglas E. Abrams
Faculty Publications
Lawyer's commonly write as the client's representative, but this article explores three opportunities for lawyers who wish also to write sometimes in non-representational roles. Part I here discusses writing or co-writing law review articles.
Glatt V. Fox Searchlight And The Rhetorical Value Of Inter-Circuit Dialogue, Stephen Smith
Glatt V. Fox Searchlight And The Rhetorical Value Of Inter-Circuit Dialogue, Stephen Smith
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"What We Lose In Sales, We Make Up In Volume": The Faulty Logic Of The Financial Services Industry's Response To The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Proposed Rule Prohibiting Class Action Bans In Arbitration Clauses, Richard Frankel
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming.