Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (15)
- Election Law (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Legal Education (3)
- Litigation (3)
-
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- International Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Military, War, and Peace (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Keyword
-
- VRA (3)
- Voting rights (3)
- Campaign finance (2)
- Shelby County v. Holder (2)
- Voting Rights Act (2)
-
- 549 U.S. 1 (1)
- ACA (1)
- Abbott (1)
- Affordable Healthcare Act (1)
- Aggressiveness (1)
- Amoco Prod. v. Southern Ute (1)
- Anderson v. Celebrezze (1)
- Anderson-Burdick (1)
- Arizona Independent Restricting Commission (1)
- Atul Gawande (1)
- Banco Español de Crédito v. Security Pacific (1)
- Banktruptcy (1)
- BedRoc Ltd. v. U.S. (1)
- Burdick v. Takushi (1)
- Burns v. Fortson (1)
- Candidates (1)
- Cemetery dedication (1)
- Champerty (1)
- Chief Justice Story (1)
- Choice of law (1)
- Citizens United (1)
- Civil War (1)
- Commercial claim investment (1)
- Compliance effort (1)
- Congressional authority (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rethinking Victim-Based Statutory Sentencing Enhancements, Kevin Bennardo
Rethinking Victim-Based Statutory Sentencing Enhancements, Kevin Bennardo
Florida State University Law Review
Punishment enhancements that are triggered by some trait of the victim are deeply en-trenched in American criminal statutes. The research underlying this Article identified over 120 distinct traits that a victim could possess that would statutorily enhance the offender’s punishment. These enhancements are often based on an inherent trait of the victim (e.g., age, disability), the victim’s occupation (e.g., law enforcement officers, utility workers), or a non-occupational role-based undertaking (e.g., jurors, visitors at a detention center).
This Article argues that such victim-based statutory enhancements should be eliminated. First, they are dreadfully inegalitarian. These enhancements send the message that society prefers …
Equity In Llc Law?, Mohsen Manesh
Equity In Llc Law?, Mohsen Manesh
Florida State University Law Review
To what extent does equity play a role in LLC law? To what extent do courts retain the judicial discretion “to do right and justice” in circumstances in which the LLC statute and the applicable LLC agreement do not otherwise offer an adequate remedy to an aggrieved LLC member or manager? Until recently, the answer to these questions was quite clear: Equity is subordinate to the freedom of contract and the express terms of the agreement governing an LLC. But the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in In re Carlisle Etcetera has upended this basic precept of LLC law and practice. …
Fixing A Broken Common Law -- Has The Property Law Of Easements And Covenants Been Reformed By A Restatement?, Ronald H. Rosenberg
Fixing A Broken Common Law -- Has The Property Law Of Easements And Covenants Been Reformed By A Restatement?, Ronald H. Rosenberg
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Second Amendment Burden: Arming Courts With A Workable Standard For Reviewing Gun Safety Legislation, Melanie Kalmanson
The Second Amendment Burden: Arming Courts With A Workable Standard For Reviewing Gun Safety Legislation, Melanie Kalmanson
Florida State University Law Review
Two controversial topics; one framework. Jurisprudence surrounding the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution lacks a workable standard under which courts are to review gun control legislation. This Note presents an intersectional argument whereby the abortion “undue burden” framework is applied to Second Amendment legislation. Through this approach of applying the abortion framework to gun control legislation, like those recently proposed or discussed, this Note argues that these provisions would likely be constitutional. Though abortion is at the center of this discussion, this Note does not aim to contribute to discourse concerning reproductive rights and accepts prima facie the current-standing …
Weapons Of The Weak: The Prosecutor Of The Icc's Power To Engage The Un Security Council, C. Cora True-Frost
Weapons Of The Weak: The Prosecutor Of The Icc's Power To Engage The Un Security Council, C. Cora True-Frost
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federalizing Retroactivity Rules: The Unrealized Promise Of Danforth V. Minnesota And The Unmet Obligation Of State Courts To Vindicate Federal Constitutional Rights, Ruthanne M. Deutsch
Federalizing Retroactivity Rules: The Unrealized Promise Of Danforth V. Minnesota And The Unmet Obligation Of State Courts To Vindicate Federal Constitutional Rights, Ruthanne M. Deutsch
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Relationship Status? It's Complicated: Redefining Sexuality In The Workplace In Light Of Obergefell And The Eeoc, Patrick Bailey
Relationship Status? It's Complicated: Redefining Sexuality In The Workplace In Light Of Obergefell And The Eeoc, Patrick Bailey
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Body Property, Kara W. Swanson
Rethinking Body Property, Kara W. Swanson
Florida State University Law Review
Body products, including blood, gametes, and kidneys, are a routine part of contemporary medicine. They are also controversial. There is a strong preference for donated gifts, based on an intuition that gifts are pure, altruistic, and healthy, and that purchased products (commodities) are tainted, exploitative, and dangerous. Law and policy reflect this dichotomy, preventing market exchanges either by declaring body products non-property or banning sales by the supplying body. Yet with growing scarcity leading to injustice in the allocation and harvesting of body products, calls to allow sales have been increasing, motivating proposals to increase supplies by compensating bone marrow …
Deeds And The Determinancy Norm: Insights From Brandt And Other Cases On An Undesignated, Yet Ever-Present, Interpretive Method, Donald J. Kochan
Deeds And The Determinancy Norm: Insights From Brandt And Other Cases On An Undesignated, Yet Ever-Present, Interpretive Method, Donald J. Kochan
Florida State University Law Review
The land one holds is generally only as good as the property rights contained in the deed. The rights contained in the deed are only as good as the ability to get those rights enforced. And, the enforcement is only valuable if it recognizes a determinate meaning in the deeds from the point of conveyance. This Article pens the term “determinacy norm” to explain a collection of rules for the interpretation of deed terms that aim to make the meaning of deed terms de-terminate. I contend that, in order to satisfy the determinacy norm for deed interpretation, courts must (and …
Overtreatment And Informed Consent: A Fraud-Based Solution To Unwanted And Unnecessary Care, Isaac D. Buck
Overtreatment And Informed Consent: A Fraud-Based Solution To Unwanted And Unnecessary Care, Isaac D. Buck
Florida State University Law Review
According to multiple accounts, the administration of American health care results in as much as $800 billion in wasted spending due largely to the provision of overly expensive, inefficient, and unnecessary services. Beyond inflicting fiscal pain on the nation’s pocketbook, this waste has no clinical benefit—and often results in unnecessary hospital stays, cascading follow-up procedures, and time-wasting inconvenience for American patients. But aside from the mere annoyance of unnecessary care, the administration of overtreatment—that is, unnecessary care in and of itself—causes harm to the patient. Excessive care is deficient care. Unnecessary care risks potential medical error and infection, and often …
Six Degrees Of Graduation: Law And Economics Of Variable Sanctions, Alex Raskolnikov
Six Degrees Of Graduation: Law And Economics Of Variable Sanctions, Alex Raskolnikov
Florida State University Law Review
From parking tickets to tax fines and punitive damages, legal sanctions matter in people’s lives. Yet neither the legal nor the economics literature offers a comprehensive treatment of sanctions. Their practical complexity is not well understood, and their theoretical analysis is fragmented. This Essay addresses both limitations using tax law as a primary example. Sanctions are complex because they vary along at least six different dimensions: aggressiveness, magnitude, culpability, effort to comply, likelihood of detection, and offense history. These six degrees of sanction graduation are distinct, and potentially independent, but often intertwined in obscure and perplexing ways. After clarifying the …
Embracing Third-Party Litigation Finance, David R. Glickman
Embracing Third-Party Litigation Finance, David R. Glickman
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Rose By Any Other Name: Florida's Return To Consolidated-Tomoka, Jacqueline Van Laningham
A Rose By Any Other Name: Florida's Return To Consolidated-Tomoka, Jacqueline Van Laningham
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Road To The Gettysburg Address, Alfred L. Brophy
The Road To The Gettysburg Address, Alfred L. Brophy
Florida State University Law Review
This Article recovers the forgotten ideas about public constitutionalism in seventy published addresses given at cemetery dedications from Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story’s address at Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1831, to the addresses by Edward Everett and Abraham Lincoln at Gettysburg in November 1863. It reveals an important, but forgotten, set of ideas that provided a precedent for Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. Those addresses, including Lincoln’s, reveal the centrality of constitutional values—as opposed to constitutional text—in framing Americans’ interpretation of the Constitution. Pre-Civil War Americans had a vibrant public discussion of constitutional principles, in addition to constitutional text. …
Through The Lens Of Innovation, Mirit Eyal-Cohen
Through The Lens Of Innovation, Mirit Eyal-Cohen
Florida State University Law Review
The legal system constantly follows the footsteps of innovation and attempts to discourage its migration overseas. Yet, present legal rules that inform and explain entrepreneurial circumstances lack a core understanding of the concept of entrepreneurship. By its nature, law imposes order. It provides rules, remedies, and classifications that direct behavior in a consistent manner. Entrepreneurship turns on the contrary. It entails making creative judgments about the unknown. It involves adapting to disarray. It thrives on deviation as opposed to traditional causation. This Article argues that these differences matter. It demonstrates that current laws lock entrepreneurs into inefficient legal routes. Through …
The Law Of Democracy At A Crossroads: Reflecting On Fifty Years Of Voting Rights And The Judicial Regulation Of The Political Thicket, Franita Tolson
The Law Of Democracy At A Crossroads: Reflecting On Fifty Years Of Voting Rights And The Judicial Regulation Of The Political Thicket, Franita Tolson
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Coordination Fallacy, Michael D. Gilbert
The Coordination Fallacy, Michael D. Gilbert
Florida State University Law Review
This symposium piece tackles an important issue in campaign finance: the relationship between coordinated expenditures and corruption. Only one form of corruption, the quid pro quo, is constitutionally significant, and it has three logical elements: (1) an actor, such as an individual or corporation, conveys value to a politician, (2) the politician conveys value to the actor, and (3) a bargain links the two. Campaign finance regulations aim to deter quid pro quos by impeding the first or third element. Limits on contributions, for example, fight corruption by capping the value an actor can convey to a politician. What about …
Reining In The Purcell Principle, Richard L. Hasen
Reining In The Purcell Principle, Richard L. Hasen
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race, Shelby County, And The Voter Information Verification Act In North Carolina, Michael D. Herron, Daniel A. Smith
Race, Shelby County, And The Voter Information Verification Act In North Carolina, Michael D. Herron, Daniel A. Smith
Florida State University Law Review
Shortly after the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder struck down section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), the State of North Carolina enacted an omnibus piece of election- reform legislation known as the Voter Information Verification Act (VIVA). Prior to Shelby, portions of North Carolina were covered jurisdictions per the VRA’s sections 4 and 5—meaning that they had to seek federal preclearance for changes to their election procedures— and this motivates our assessment of whether VIVA’s many alterations to North Carolina’s election procedures are race-neutral. We show that in presidential elections in North Carolina black early voters …
Legislative Delegations And The Elections Clause, Derek T. Muller
Legislative Delegations And The Elections Clause, Derek T. Muller
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rescuing Retrogression, Michael J. Pitts
Rescuing Retrogression, Michael J. Pitts
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Voting Is Association, Daniel P. Tokaji
Voting Is Association, Daniel P. Tokaji
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Don Weidner: Man Of Action, Margaret "Peggy" A. Rolando
Don Weidner: Man Of Action, Margaret "Peggy" A. Rolando
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Tribute To Dean Don Weidner, Rebecca Hanner White
A Tribute To Dean Don Weidner, Rebecca Hanner White
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Personal Jurisdiction Doctrine Does -- And What It Should Do, Katherine Florey
What Personal Jurisdiction Doctrine Does -- And What It Should Do, Katherine Florey
Florida State University Law Review
Commentators have routinely noted the complexity, opacity, and multiple functions of U.S. personal jurisdiction doctrine. Yet underlying this comparative chaos are two important concerns. Both commentary and Supreme Court cases have long recognized that a court's assertion of power over a particular defendant and case may have two undesirable consequences. First the burden on the defendant of having to appear before a certain type of court or in a particular location may be unacceptably high. Second a court's jurisdictional overreaching may encroach upon the sovereignty of other states or nations and in so doing, may foster uncertainty about which sovereign's …
Stays Of Injunctive Relief Pending Appeal: Why The Merits Should Not Matter, Jill Wieber Lens
Stays Of Injunctive Relief Pending Appeal: Why The Merits Should Not Matter, Jill Wieber Lens
Florida State University Law Review
In Nken v. Holder, the Supreme Court delineated the standards that must guide a court’s discretion in deciding whether to stay injunctive relief pending appeal A “critical” factor is whether the stay applicant has made a “strong showing” of her likelihood to succeed on the merits of the appeal. Because of the critical label it is not surprising to see lower courts issue long decisions extensively predicting the decision of the appellate court on the merits. To preserve her interest in judicial review, the stay applicant must effectively show that she will win the appeal.
Stays play an important …
Filling The Gap Of Domestic Violence Protection: Returning Human Rights To U.S. Victims, Melanie Kalmanson
Filling The Gap Of Domestic Violence Protection: Returning Human Rights To U.S. Victims, Melanie Kalmanson
Florida State University Law Review
The prevalence of domestic violence in the United States indicates a need for increased governmental protection. The current state-based system inadequately serves victims of domestic violence, and previous US. Supreme Court rulings indicate that the U.S. Constitution leaves the federal government in an impotent position for providing any form of protection for domestic violence victims. Pursuant to the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man, domestic violence violates one's human rights, or those fundamental to personhood. By ratifying the American Declaration through the Charter of the Organization of the American States, the United States established its responsibility for …
The Case For A Uniform Definition Of A Leveraged Loan, Zachary L. Pechter
The Case For A Uniform Definition Of A Leveraged Loan, Zachary L. Pechter
Florida State University Law Review
Over the past twenty years, leveraged loans and high yield bonds have converged into similar instruments, sparking a debate as to whether leveraged loans should be regulated as securities like high yield bonds. This Note recognizes problems with the current regulatory framework for leveraged loans and shows that leveraged loans are not securities and should not be regulated as such. Instead of regulating leveraged loans as securities, which would likely be more costly than beneficial and contrary to the SEC’s mission statement, the SEC should promulgate a uniform definition of a leveraged loan. This solution would alleviate problems such as …
Quick And Dirty: The New Misreading Of The Voting Rights Act, Justin Levitt
Quick And Dirty: The New Misreading Of The Voting Rights Act, Justin Levitt
Florida State University Law Review
The role of race in the apportionment of political power is one of the thorniest problems at the heart of American democracy, and reappears with dogged consistency on the docket of the Supreme Court. Most recently, the Court resolved a case from Alabama involving the Voting Rights Act and the appropriate use of race in redistricting. But though the Court correctly decided the narrow issue before it, the litigation posture of the case hid the fact that Alabama is part of a disturbing pattern. Jurisdictions like Alabama have been applying not the Voting Rights Act, but a ham-handed cartoon of …
A "Checklist Manifesto" For Election Day: How To Prevent Mistakes At The Polls, Joshua A. Douglas
A "Checklist Manifesto" For Election Day: How To Prevent Mistakes At The Polls, Joshua A. Douglas
Florida State University Law Review
Mistakes happen—especially at the polls on Election Day. To fix this complex problem inherent in election administration, this Article proposes the use of simple checklists. Errors occur in every election, yet many of them are avoidable. Poll workers should have easy-to-use tools to help them on Election Day as they handle throngs of voters. Checklists can assist poll workers in pausing during a complex process to avoid errors. This is a simple idea with a big payoff: fewer lost votes, shorter lines at the polls, a reduction in post-election litigation, and smoother election administration. Further, unlike many other suggested election …