Law Commons^™

"Economic Property Rights" As "Nonsense Upon Stilts": A Comment On Hodgson, Daniel H. Cole

Articles by Maurer Faculty

Hodgson's (2015) critique of extra-legal 'property rights' - in this case, so-called 'economic property rights' - is right on target. This Comment contributes two further points to his critique. First, the notion of 'economic property rights' is based on what Gilbert Ryle (1949) referred to as a 'category mistake', conflating physical possession, which is a brute fact about the world, with the right or entitlement to possession, which is a social or institutional fact that cannot exist in the absence of some social contract, convention, covenant, or agreement. The very notion of a non-institutional 'right' is oxymoronic. Second, the fact …