Law Commons^™

Kings County, Et Al., Petitioners, V. Surface Transportation Board And United States Of America, Et Al., Proposed Amicus Curiae Brief Of Center For Biological Diversity In Support Of Neither Party For Abstention Or Reversal Of The Surface Transportation Board’S Decision, Helen H. Kang, Et Al.

Publications

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-71780 KINGS COUNTY, et al., Petitioners, v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents, and CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY Intervenor and Respondent.

No. 15-72570 DIGNITY HEALTH, Petitioner, v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents, and CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY Intervenor and Respondent. _______________________________________________________________ PROPOSED AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY FOR ABSTENTION OR REVERSAL OF THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD’S DECISION

Friends Of The Eel River And Californians For Alternatives To Toxics V. North Coast Railroad Authority And Board Of Directors Of North Coast Railroad Authority, Et Al., Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Response To Briefs Of Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents And Real Party In Interest, Helen H. Kang, Et Al.

Publications

Case No. S222472, In the Supreme Court of the State of California, FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER AND CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, Plaintiffs and Appellants, vs. NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY, Defendants and Respondents, NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. After a Decision by the Court of Appeal First Appellate District, Division One, Case Nos. A 139222, A139235 Appeal from Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Marin Case Nos. CIV 1103605, CIV 1103591. The Honorable Roy Chernus, Presiding. PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO …

Sea Level Rise, Saltwater Intrusion And Endangered Fisheries - Shifting Baselines For The Bay Delta Conservation Plan, Paul S. Kibel

Publications

UC Davis School of Law's March 2015 symposium on The Future of CEQA, out of which this article evolved, focused on how the substantive law governing the operation of the California Environmental Quality Act might change in the coming decades. In my presentation for the symposium's final panel, I suggested that certain changes in CEQA substantive law may well be driven by the increasing recognition that the background conditions against which projects will operate will themselves change significantly in the future.

Wasted Water: Reasonable Use Law In 21st Century California, Golden Gate University School Of Law

Environmental Law Symposia

Proceedings of 2015 California Water Law Symposium (WLS), Prepared by Center on Urban Environmental Law (CUEL) at Golden Gate University (GGU) School of Law.

Candlestick Park Will Go Out With A Wrecking Ball, Not A Bang, Phillip Matier, Andrew Ross

Articles About GGU Law

Plans for a pyrotechnic implosion of Candlestick Park have fizzled in favor of the wrecking ball — with health fears and political pressure playing a big part in the decision.

The 54-year-old stadium is being demolished to make way for a shopping center, hotel and housing complex. But an attention-grabbing plan to implode the Stick next month ran into stiff opposition from Golden Gate University’s Environmental Law and Justice Clinic and the Bayview Hill Neighborhood Association over fears about noise and the spread of toxic dust.

2015 Annual Report: Together Creating A Clean Air Future, Bay Area Air Quality Management District

Environment, Energy, and Water

No abstract provided.

Controlling Ancillary Emissions Under The Clean Air Act: Consideration Of Energy Storage As Best Available Control Technology, Deborah Nicole Behles

Publications

Renewable energy is being deployed throughout the country to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases. Reliance on increasing amounts of renewable energy, however, may lead to significant unanticipated increases in pollution because of the likelihood of fossil fuel facilities starting, stopping, and running more often to back up renewable resources. Estimates show that these emissions increases can drastically undercut the potential emission benefits of increased renewable penetration. To date, this changing role of fossil fuel facilities has not been thoughtfully evaluated in Clean Air Act permitting decisions for new and modified sources, even though the Act requires consideration of all …

Environment, Energy, And Resources Law: The Year In Review, Helen H. Kang

Publications

Contributor to ch. 26, Constitutional Law Report, pp.337-339.

Bay Area Air Quality Management District 2014 Annual Report, Bay Area Air Quality Management District

California Agencies

No abstract provided.

2015 Annual Report - Together Creating A Clean Air Future, Bay Area Air Quality Management District

California Agencies

No abstract provided.