Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2015

Selected Works

Law and Economics

James P. George

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Access To Justice, Costs, And Legal Aid, James P. George Jul 2015

Access To Justice, Costs, And Legal Aid, James P. George

James P. George

If the ideal of justice is not pervasive in the United States, the issue of justice is-not so much in its rendition, but in its penetration of news, politics and entertainment. Current media issues include the death penalty--erroneous convictions and the lack of lawyers for appeals; tort reform--conflicting data on medical malpractice litigation and a perceived abuse of class actions; and the judiciary itself--judicial selection, political attacks on so-called "activist judges," and the sometimes hidden issue of court budgets. Within this fascination, the multiple problems in accessing justice are lost.

This article is excerpted from a report done for the …


Reimposable Discounts And Medieval Contract Penalties, James P. George Jul 2015

Reimposable Discounts And Medieval Contract Penalties, James P. George

James P. George

Penalty damages in contract -- contrary to Anglo-American law since the late Middle Ages -- ironically are common as reimposed discounts in modern consumer contracts. The reimposable discount is a late-twentieth-century sales scheme that combines legal puffery with illegal penalties. These pitches are used to sell furniture, appliances, cell phones, cars, to rent apartments, and to promote elective eye surgery. The offers are tempting and often heavily marketed in the media.

The common premise is that if the buyer acts now, the seller will discount the good or service by reducing the price, or by postponing the first payment and …


Jurisdictional Implications In The Reduced Funding Of Lower Federal Courts, James P. George Jul 2015

Jurisdictional Implications In The Reduced Funding Of Lower Federal Courts, James P. George

James P. George

This article argues two related propositions. First, if Congress were to eliminate all funding for lower federal courts, its constitutional authority to regulate those courts would become as meaningless as the empty courthouses. Second, Congress breaches its duty to furnish a forum at a point short of full defunding, and with that breach, Congress's regulatory power over private civil disputes otherwise litigable in state courts--preempted and removable state law claims--becomes constitutionally invalid. The first fact setting of full defunding is hypothetical; the second has been underway for several years.