Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administration (1)
- Administrative (1)
- Administrative Law; Jurisprudence; Legisprudence; Presidential Management; Unitary Executive; Office of Management and Budget; OMB; Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; OIRA (1)
- Agency (1)
- Agency action (1)
-
- Agency deference (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Constitution; administrative law; government (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Day in court (1)
- Defective drugs (1)
- Drugs (1)
- FDA (1)
- First time filers (1)
- Foreign policy (1)
- Foreign relations (1)
- Internationalization (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Justice (1)
- Liability (1)
- Medicare (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Procedural triage (1)
- Procedure (1)
- Skidmore (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Tort (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Procedural Triage, Matthew J.B. Lawrence
Procedural Triage, Matthew J.B. Lawrence
Fordham Law Review
Prior scholarship has assumed that the inherent value of a "day in court" is the same for all claimants, so that when procedural resources (like a jury trial or a hearing) are scarce, they should be rationed the same way for all claimants. That is incorrect. This Article shows that the inherent value of a "day in court" can be far greater for some claimants, such as first-time filers, than for others, such as corporate entities and that it can be both desirable and feasible to take this variation into account in doling out scarce procedural protections. In other words, …
"A Distinction Without A Difference"?: Bartlett Going Forward, Steven A. Schwartz
"A Distinction Without A Difference"?: Bartlett Going Forward, Steven A. Schwartz
Fordham Law Review
This Note addresses the question of whether federal law preempts state design defect claims against generic drug manufacturers regardless of which test state law uses to determine whether a drug is defective. This issue, arising out of the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of preemption jurisprudence and fundamental tort law as stated in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett, is significant because it plays a large role in determining to what extent generic drug manufacturers are immune to civil liability arising out of injuries caused by their generic drugs. In an age of rising medical costs and jury awards, both plaintiff …
Longstanding Agency Interpretations, Anita S. Krishnakumar
Longstanding Agency Interpretations, Anita S. Krishnakumar
Fordham Law Review
How much deference—or what kind—should courts give to longstanding agency interpretations of statutes? Surprisingly, courts and scholars lack a coherent answer to this question. Legal scholars long have assumed that longstanding agency statutory interpretations are treated with heightened deference on judicial review, and federal courts sometimes have made statements suggesting that this is the case. But in practice, federal court review of longstanding agency interpretations—at both the U.S. Supreme Court and courts of appeals—turns out to be surprisingly erratic. Reviewing courts sometimes note the longevity of an agency’s statutory interpretation as a plus factor in their deference analysis but at …
The Internationalization Of Agency Actions, Jason Marisam
The Internationalization Of Agency Actions, Jason Marisam
Fordham Law Review
U.S. agencies routinely base their domestic regulations on international considerations, such as the benefits of coordinating American and foreign standards or the foreign policy advantages of a particular policy. I refer to this phenomenon as the internationalization of agency actions. This Article examines what the internationalization of agency actions means for agency decision-making processes, institutional design, and legal doctrine. It creates a stylized model of how agencies determine whether to coordinate their standards with foreign regulations. Among other institutional design findings, it shows that court opinions that reduce the stringency of judicial review when agencies implement internationally coordinated standards make …
The Legitimacy Of Administrative Law, Jed H. Shugerman
The Legitimacy Of Administrative Law, Jed H. Shugerman
Faculty Scholarship
Reviewing Daniel R. Ernst, Tocqueville’s Nightmare: The Administrative State Emerges in America, 1900-1940; Joanna Grisinger, The Unwieldy American State: Administrative Politics Since the New Deal; Philip Hamburger, Is Administrative Law Unlawful?; Jerry L. Mashaw, Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law; and Nicholas R. Parrillo, Against the Profit Motive: The Salary Revolution in American Government, 1780-1940.
Regleprudence – At Oira And Beyond, Nestor M. Davidson, Ethan J. Leib
Regleprudence – At Oira And Beyond, Nestor M. Davidson, Ethan J. Leib
Faculty Scholarship
There are significant domains of legality within the administrative state that are mostly immune from judicial review and have mostly escaped the attention of legal theorists. While administrative law generally focuses on the products of agency action as they are reviewed by the judiciary, there are important aspects of regulatory activity that are legal or law-like but rarely interrogated by systematic analysis with reference to accounts about the role and nature of law. In this Article, we introduce a category of analysis we call "regleprudence," a sibling of jurisprudence and legisprudence. Once we explore some regleprudential norms, we delve into …
You Didn't Even Notice! Elements Of Effective Online Privacy Policies, Amanda Grannis
You Didn't Even Notice! Elements Of Effective Online Privacy Policies, Amanda Grannis
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.