Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- International criminal law (2)
- Law--Methodology (2)
- Acceptable deviance (1)
-
- Administrative Law; Jurisprudence; Legisprudence; Presidential Management; Unitary Executive; Office of Management and Budget; OMB; Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; OIRA (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Appellant review (1)
- California Law Review Circuit (1)
- Cognitive development (1)
- Comparable worth (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Court of Appeals (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- DOMA (1)
- Defense of Marriage Act (1)
- Developmental Neuroscience (1)
- Dictionaries (1)
- Diffuse harm (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Employment practice (1)
- Executive enforcement (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Freedom of expression (1)
- Freedom of religion (1)
- Judicial process (1)
- Justice (1)
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sovereignty And Subversion, Alice Ristroph
Federalism, Marriage, And Heather Gerken's Mad Genius, Kristin Collins
Federalism, Marriage, And Heather Gerken's Mad Genius, Kristin Collins
Faculty Scholarship
In her characteristically astute and engaging essay, Professor Heather Gerken offers a sensitive and sympathetic reading of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion in United States v. Windsor.1 Her core claim is that Windsor—and the transformation of political and legal support for same-sex marriage in the United States—demonstrate how “federalism and rights work together to promote change” and, in particular, how federalism furthers the equality and liberty values of the Fourteenth Amendment.2 This is a natural line of argument for Gerken to develop with respect to Windsor, as she has produced an incredible body of scholarship dedicated to what …
Spokeo V. Robins And The Constitutional Foundations Of Statutory Standing, Maxwell Stearns
Spokeo V. Robins And The Constitutional Foundations Of Statutory Standing, Maxwell Stearns
Faculty Scholarship
In Spokeo v. Robins, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to address the following question: Does Congress have the power to confer standing upon an individual claiming that a privately owned website violated its federal statutory obligation to take specified steps designed to promote accuracy in aggregating and reporting his personal and financial data even if the resulting false disclosures did not produce concrete harm? This somewhat arcane standing issue involves congressional power to broaden the scope of the first of three constitutional standing requirements: injury in fact, causation, and redressability. Although the case does not directly address the prudential …
The Alignment Of Law And Norms: Of Mirrors, Bulwarks, And Pressure Valves, Mark A. Edwards
The Alignment Of Law And Norms: Of Mirrors, Bulwarks, And Pressure Valves, Mark A. Edwards
Faculty Scholarship
Why does law mirror norms sometimes, but other times not? This article examines two types of intervening factors that sometimes cause a persistent misalignment between law and norms: pressure valves and bulwarks.
Pressure valves are mechanisms that relieve the pressure placed on the law to change despite a gap with social norms. Pressure valves are found in two distinct social phenomena.
First, pressure on law to change to reflect social norms is relieved when law is not enforced against behavior that is illegal, but socially acceptable. Formally deviant acts that are socially acceptable often do not generate an enforcement response. …
Judge Jack Weinstein And The Allure Of Antiproceduralism, Howard M. Erichson
Judge Jack Weinstein And The Allure Of Antiproceduralism, Howard M. Erichson
Faculty Scholarship
In one sense of the word proceduralist — a person with expertise in procedure — Judge Jack Weinstein is among the leading proceduralists on the federal bench. But in another sense of the word proceduralist — an adherent of proceduralism, or faithfulness to established procedures — he falls at a different end of the spectrum. Looking at four examples of Judge Weinstein’s work in mass litigation, this Article considers what it means to be an antiproceduralist, someone unwilling to let procedural niceties stand in the way of substantive justice. The allure of antiproceduralism is that it eschews technicalities in favor …
An Eighth Amendment Analysis Of Statutes Allowing Or Mandating Transfer Of Juvenile Offenders To Adult Criminal Court In Light Of The Supreme Court's Recent Jurisprudence Recognizing Developmental Neuroscience, Katherine I. Puzone
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Surprising Acquittals In The Gotovina And Perisic Cases: Is The Icty Appeals Chamber A Trial Chamber In Sheep's Clothing, Mark A. Summers
The Surprising Acquittals In The Gotovina And Perisic Cases: Is The Icty Appeals Chamber A Trial Chamber In Sheep's Clothing, Mark A. Summers
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Prosecuting Generals For War Crimes The Shifting Sands Of Accomplice Liability In International Criminal Law, Mark A. Summers
Prosecuting Generals For War Crimes The Shifting Sands Of Accomplice Liability In International Criminal Law, Mark A. Summers
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Some Reasons Courts Have Become Active Participants In The Search For Ultimate Moral And Political Truth, George C. Christie
Some Reasons Courts Have Become Active Participants In The Search For Ultimate Moral And Political Truth, George C. Christie
Faculty Scholarship
This short essay was prompted by the increasing delegation to courts of the responsibility for deciding what are basically moral questions, such as in litigation involving human rights conventions, as well as the responsibility for deciding basic issues of social policy with at best only the most general guidelines to guide their exercise of judicial discretion. The essay discusses some of the reasons for this delegation of authority and briefly describes how courts have struggled to meet this obligation without transcending accepted notions governing the limits of judicial discretion.
Dictionaries 2.0: Exploring The Gap Between The Supreme Court And Courts Of Appeals, James J. Brudney, Lawrence Baum
Dictionaries 2.0: Exploring The Gap Between The Supreme Court And Courts Of Appeals, James J. Brudney, Lawrence Baum
Faculty Scholarship
The remarkable rise in dictionary usage by the Supreme Court since themid-1980s has been a subject of considerable scholarly and media interest. Wepublished an article in November 2013 that explored the Court’s new dictionary culture in depth from empirical and doctrinal perspectives. In a Yale Law Journal Note one year later, John Calhoun embraced some of our findings, criticized others, and—importantly—broadened the inquiry to identify asizeable gap in overall frequency of citation to dictionaries between the Supreme Court and the federal courts of appeals.
This gap in dictionary usage is our primary focus here. Previously we analyzed nearly 700 Supreme …
Regleprudence – At Oira And Beyond, Nestor M. Davidson, Ethan J. Leib
Regleprudence – At Oira And Beyond, Nestor M. Davidson, Ethan J. Leib
Faculty Scholarship
There are significant domains of legality within the administrative state that are mostly immune from judicial review and have mostly escaped the attention of legal theorists. While administrative law generally focuses on the products of agency action as they are reviewed by the judiciary, there are important aspects of regulatory activity that are legal or law-like but rarely interrogated by systematic analysis with reference to accounts about the role and nature of law. In this Article, we introduce a category of analysis we call "regleprudence," a sibling of jurisprudence and legisprudence. Once we explore some regleprudential norms, we delve into …
Reasonableness In And Out Of Negligence Law, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Reasonableness In And Out Of Negligence Law, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Faculty Scholarship
The word "reasonable" and its cognates figure prominently in innumerable areas of the law – from antitrust and contract law to administrative and constitutional law, from the common law of nuisance to an assortment of rules in statutes and regulations. While some thinkers have equated "reasonableness" with "rationality," others have looked to "justifiability," and others still have decided that "reasonableness" means virtually nothing at all, but serves the important function of allocating decisionmaking authority. The reality is that the term "reasonable" is both vague and ambiguous, and thus plays many different roles in the law. As with terms such as …
Professor Greenawalt's Unfashionable Idea, H. Jefferson Powell
Professor Greenawalt's Unfashionable Idea, H. Jefferson Powell
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Originalism As A Theory Of Legal Change, Stephen E. Sachs
Originalism As A Theory Of Legal Change, Stephen E. Sachs
Faculty Scholarship
Originalism is usually defended as a theory of interpretation. This Article presents a different view. Originalism ought to be defended, if at all, not based on normative goals or abstract philosophy, but as a positive theory of American legal practice, and particularly of our rules for legal change.
One basic assumption of legal systems is that the law, whatever it is, stays the same until it's lawfully changed. Originalism begins this process with an origin, a Founding. Whatever rules we had when the Constitution was adopted, we still have today -- unless something happened that was authorized to change …
Resisting Wholesale Electronic Invasion Of The Fourth Amendment, Michael E. Tigar
Resisting Wholesale Electronic Invasion Of The Fourth Amendment, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Feminist Jurisprudence Of Jack Weinstein, Anita Bernstein
The Feminist Jurisprudence Of Jack Weinstein, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Catalogs, Alex Stein, Gideon Parchomovsky
Obergefell At The Intersection Of Civil Rights And Social Movements, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Obergefell At The Intersection Of Civil Rights And Social Movements, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
A judicial decision striking down formalized discrimination marks a crucial moment for those it affects and, in some instances, for the surrounding society as well. The Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges was unquestionably one of those instances.
This essay considers the distinct ways in which the civil rights and social movements for marriage equality gave rise to this durable socio-political transformation. While some scholarship is skeptical about whether rights-focused advocacy can bring meaningful change to people’s day-to-day lives, I argue that the marriage equality movements demonstrate a synergistic relationship between law reform and social change efforts. During the …