Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- President/Executive Department (14)
- Administrative Law (10)
- Judges (7)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
-
- Legal History (3)
- Military, War, and Peace (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Asian Studies (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Defense and Security Studies (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Relations (1)
- International and Area Studies (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Military and Veterans Studies (1)
- National Security Law (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (10)
- New York Law School (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- George Washington University Law School (1)
-
- Louisiana State University (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (7)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- Schmooze 'tickets' (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
-
- Articles (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Law Faculty Briefs and Court Documents (1)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (1)
- Student Senate Enrolled Legislation (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- William K. Kelley (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 25 of 25
Full-Text Articles in Law
Brief Of Political Scientists And Historians As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent, National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner V. Noel Canning, No. 12-1281, United States Supreme Court (Nov. 25, 2013), David F. Forte, Hadley P. Arkes, Joseph M. Bessette, Nelson Lund, Jeremy A. Rabkin, Ralph A. Rossum
Brief Of Political Scientists And Historians As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent, National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner V. Noel Canning, No. 12-1281, United States Supreme Court (Nov. 25, 2013), David F. Forte, Hadley P. Arkes, Joseph M. Bessette, Nelson Lund, Jeremy A. Rabkin, Ralph A. Rossum
Law Faculty Briefs and Court Documents
The Recess Appointments Clause does not permit the unilateral appointments to the NLRB made by the President in this case. Those appointments - made during a three-day “intra-session” break when the Senate was meeting pro forma - are unique in the history of the Republic. They are also the culmination of unnecessary and inappropriate Executive overreaching. This overreaching has undermined a valuable Senate prerogative in a manner unfathomable to the Founders and inconsistent with the design of the Constitution.
The primary purpose of this brief is to show that adhering to the original meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause has …
Avoiding Constitutional Questions As A Three-Branch Problem, William K. Kelley
Avoiding Constitutional Questions As A Three-Branch Problem, William K. Kelley
William K. Kelley
This article criticizes the cardinal rule of statutory construction known as the avoidance canon - that statutes must be interpreted to avoid raising serious constitutional questions - as failing to respect the proper constitutional roles of both Congress and the Executive. It argues that the avoidance canon in practice cannot be grounded in legislative supremacy, which is the common justification for it offered by the Supreme Court, because it assumes without foundation that Congress would always prefer not to come close to the constitutional line in enacting statutes. Instead, the avoidance canon creates pressure for courts to adopt statutory meanings …
Legal Affairs: Dreyfus, Guantánamo, And The Foundation Of The Rule Of Law, David Cole
Legal Affairs: Dreyfus, Guantánamo, And The Foundation Of The Rule Of Law, David Cole
Touro Law Review
Analogous to the Dreyfus affair, America's reaction to the events of September 11, 2001, subverted the rule of law to impose penalties on those it viewed as a threat. There are lessons to be learned from both the Dreyfus affair and America's reaction to September 11, 2001.
On Executive Clemency: The Pardon Of Richard M. Nixon , Michael K. Mckibbin
On Executive Clemency: The Pardon Of Richard M. Nixon , Michael K. Mckibbin
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
President's Message, Barbara Lundin Kovarovic
President's Message, Barbara Lundin Kovarovic
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
President's Page, David J. Agatstein
President's Page, David J. Agatstein
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The President's Message, Paul Wyler
The President's Message, Paul Wyler
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
President's Report, Paul Wyler
President's Report, Paul Wyler
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
President's Report, Morgan E. Thompson
President's Report, Morgan E. Thompson
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
President's Message, Margaret Giovanniello
President's Message, Margaret Giovanniello
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Role Of The Olc In Providing Legal Advice To The Commander-In-Chief After September 11th: The Choices Made By The Bush Administration Office Of Legal Counsel, Arthur H. Garrison
The Role Of The Olc In Providing Legal Advice To The Commander-In-Chief After September 11th: The Choices Made By The Bush Administration Office Of Legal Counsel, Arthur H. Garrison
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The first two roles of the U.S. Attorney General from its inception were to represent the interests of the United States before the U.S. Supreme Court and to advise the President on matters of the law. Despite the Attorney General delegating both roles, the former to the Solicitor General and the latter to the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), the Attorney General and the Department of Justice are by statute and tradition looked upon to be the protectors of the rule of law within the Executive Branch. It is to the Attorney General, and by delegation to the OLC, to …
S13rs Sgr No. 1 (Transition Advisory), Schwartzenburg
S13rs Sgr No. 1 (Transition Advisory), Schwartzenburg
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
No abstract provided.
The Powers Of Congress And The President On Matters That Affect U.S. Foreign Affairs, Malvina Halberstam
The Powers Of Congress And The President On Matters That Affect U.S. Foreign Affairs, Malvina Halberstam
Articles
No abstract provided.
Presidential Pardon In Singapore: A Comment On Yong Vui Kong V Ag, Shubhankar Dam
Presidential Pardon In Singapore: A Comment On Yong Vui Kong V Ag, Shubhankar Dam
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
This paper critically analyses the decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General in relation to presidential pardon. Two questions were central to the case. First, is the President bound by the decision of the Cabinet in pardon-related matters? Secondly, are decisions regarding pardon—whether made by the Cabinet or President—subject to judicial review? In relation to the first question, the Court based its reasoning on Singapore's political system being a Westminster-inspired model and, therefore, that the President generally undertakes the same functions as the British monarch. However, this paper identifies the unique features of Singapore's …
Democratizing The Executive, Bernadette Meyler
Democratizing The Executive, Bernadette Meyler
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
The Imbecilic Executive, Saikrishna Prakash
Nixon V. Fitzgerald: Recognition Of Absolute Immunity From Personal Damage Liability For Presidential Acts, Craig B. Forry
Nixon V. Fitzgerald: Recognition Of Absolute Immunity From Personal Damage Liability For Presidential Acts, Craig B. Forry
Pepperdine Law Review
Although traditionally it has been recognized that the President is absolutely immune from personal damage liability for his official acts, there is no precedent for this rule in constitutional text or case law. However, in the case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald, the Supreme Court overruled lower federal courts in establishing a clear precedent for the President's absolute immunity from personal liability for civil damages. The author examines this decision in light of traditional principles of official immunity and analyzes the Court's holding from the standpoint of whether the President is indeed placed "above the law."
The Confrontation Of The Legislative And Executive Branches: An Examination Of The Constitutional Balance Of Powers And The Role Of The Attorney General, Robert E. Palmer
The Confrontation Of The Legislative And Executive Branches: An Examination Of The Constitutional Balance Of Powers And The Role Of The Attorney General, Robert E. Palmer
Pepperdine Law Review
The United States Constitution created an internally dependent tripartite governing scheme which relied upon a carefully drafted system of checks and balances as a means of self-regulation. Recent years have seen increased conflicts between the separate branches, the most recent of which is the occasion for this article. The article traces the rise and fall of the power exercised by the various branches and then focuses on the recent confrontation between Congress and the executive branch concerning the actions of the Environmental Protection Agency and the subsequent resignation of Anne McGill Burford. Of particular interest to this inquiry is the …
President John Adams And Four Chief Justices: An Essay For James F. Simon, R.B. Bernstein
President John Adams And Four Chief Justices: An Essay For James F. Simon, R.B. Bernstein
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Justices And Chief Executives: Some Thoughts On Jim Simon’S Books, Akhil Reed Amar
Chief Justices And Chief Executives: Some Thoughts On Jim Simon’S Books, Akhil Reed Amar
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Two Great Leaders, L.A. Powe Jr.
Resurrecting Court Deference To The Securities And Exchange Commission: Definition Of “Security”, Steven J. Cleveland
Resurrecting Court Deference To The Securities And Exchange Commission: Definition Of “Security”, Steven J. Cleveland
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Roundtable Discussion Transcript: The Legal And Ethical Limits Of Technological Warfare Symposium, February 1, 2013, University Of Utah, S.J. Quinney College Of Law, Amos N. Guiora, Harry Soyster, David R. Irvine, Geoffrey S. Corn, James Jay Carafano, Claire O. Finkelstein, Laurie R. Blank, Monica Hakimi, George R. Lucas, Trevor W. Morrison, Frederic Megret
Roundtable Discussion Transcript: The Legal And Ethical Limits Of Technological Warfare Symposium, February 1, 2013, University Of Utah, S.J. Quinney College Of Law, Amos N. Guiora, Harry Soyster, David R. Irvine, Geoffrey S. Corn, James Jay Carafano, Claire O. Finkelstein, Laurie R. Blank, Monica Hakimi, George R. Lucas, Trevor W. Morrison, Frederic Megret
All Faculty Scholarship
The Utah Law Review brought in a panel of experts for a symposium on the legal and ethical limits of technological warfare. This roundtable discussion crystalized the issues discussed throughout the symposium. The collective experience and diversity of viewpoints of the panelists produced an unparalleled discussion of the complex and poignant issues involved in drone warfare. The open dialogue in the roundtable discussion created moments of tension where the panelists openly challenged each other’s viewpoints on the ethics and legality of drone warfare. The discussion captured in this transcript uniquely conveys the diversity of perspectives and inherently challenging legal and …
Bargaining In The Shadow Of The Debt Ceiling: When Negotiating Over Spending And Tax Laws, Congress And The President Should Consider The Debt Ceiling A Dead Letter, Neil H. Buchanan, Michael C. Dorf
Bargaining In The Shadow Of The Debt Ceiling: When Negotiating Over Spending And Tax Laws, Congress And The President Should Consider The Debt Ceiling A Dead Letter, Neil H. Buchanan, Michael C. Dorf
UF Law Faculty Publications
If the debt ceiling is inconsistent with existing spending and taxing laws, what must the President do? In earlier work, we argued that when Congress creates a “trilemma” — making it impossible for the President to spend as much as Congress has ordered, to tax only as much as Congress has ordered, and to borrow no more than Congress has permitted — the Constitution requires the President to choose the least unconstitutional path. In particular, he must honor Congress’s decisions and priorities regarding spending and taxing, and he must issue enough debt to do so. Here, we extend the analysis …
Bargaining In The Shadow Of The Debt Ceiling: When Negotiating Over Spending And Tax Laws, Congress And The President Should Consider The Debt Ceiling A Dead Letter, Neil H. Buchanan, Michael C. Dorf
Bargaining In The Shadow Of The Debt Ceiling: When Negotiating Over Spending And Tax Laws, Congress And The President Should Consider The Debt Ceiling A Dead Letter, Neil H. Buchanan, Michael C. Dorf
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
If the debt ceiling is inconsistent with existing spending and taxing laws, what must the President do? In earlier work, we argued that when Congress creates a “trilemma” — making it impossible for the President to spend as much as Congress has ordered, to tax only as much as Congress has ordered, and to borrow no more than Congress has permitted — the Constitution requires the President to choose the least unconstitutional path. In particular, he must honor Congress’s decisions and priorities regarding spending and taxing, and he must issue enough debt to do so. Here, we extend the analysis …