Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law (9)
- Animal welfare (5)
- Legal history (3)
- Agricultural animals (2)
- Animal Welfare Act (2)
-
- Consumer protection (2)
- Elephants (2)
- Endangered Species Act (2)
- Law reviews (2)
- Meat labeling (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Ag-gag laws (1)
- Agriculture (1)
- American Bar Association (1)
- Animal Fighting Spectator Prohibition Act (1)
- Animal Law Review (1)
- Animal advocacy (1)
- Animal advocates (1)
- Animal control (1)
- Animal control officers (1)
- Animal protection (1)
- Animal research (1)
- Animal rights (1)
- Animal sacrifice (1)
- Animal welfare laws (1)
- Animal-based food industries (1)
- Animal-welfare labeling (1)
- Animals as property (1)
- Ape conservation (1)
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Law
2012 Federal Legislative Review, Carolyn Greenshields, Kimberly White Laduca
2012 Federal Legislative Review, Carolyn Greenshields, Kimberly White Laduca
Animal Law Review
No abstract provided.
Saving Apes With The Laws Of Men: Great Ape Protection In A Property-Based Animal Law System, Alexandra B. Rhodes
Saving Apes With The Laws Of Men: Great Ape Protection In A Property-Based Animal Law System, Alexandra B. Rhodes
Animal Law Review
This Note evaluates the methods advocates have taken toward furthering great ape protection in the United States (U.S.). Many animal advocates argue that abolishing animals’ property status is essential to establishing effective protections; nonetheless, it will take time for our society to accept the concept of legal personhood for animals. Therefore, this Note suggests that for the time being, great ape protection should be framed in a human context, to protect animals within the existing, property-based animal law system. In general, this Note provides background on the property status of animals in the U.S., specifically analyzes the legal status of …
Front Matter
Animal Law Review
Front Matter includes Title Page, Masthead, advisors, and Table of Contents for Animal Law Review Volume 19, Issue 2, 2013.
Bullhooks And The Law: Is Pain And Suffering The Elephant In The Room?, Trevor J. Smith
Bullhooks And The Law: Is Pain And Suffering The Elephant In The Room?, Trevor J. Smith
Animal Law Review
In the United States, violent use of “bullhooks”—sharpened, steel-tipped rods—on captive elephants at carnivals, circuses, and zoos is all too routine. Yet animal-welfare advocates struggle to protect elephants from the (mis)use of bullhooks under the current regulatory regime. At the federal level, advocates cannot consistently rely on either the Animal Welfare Act or the Endangered Species Act, due to these statutes’ narrow provisions, standing limitations, and inconsistent enforcement. State animal-protection laws are equally deficient, as only two states have defined suffering and abuse clearly enough in their statutes to enable effective prosecution of elephant mistreatment, and plaintiffs in even these …
Reconciling The Migratory Bird Treaty Act With Expanding Wind Energy To Keep Big Wheels Turning And Endangered Birds Flying, Robert J. Martin, Rob Ballard
Reconciling The Migratory Bird Treaty Act With Expanding Wind Energy To Keep Big Wheels Turning And Endangered Birds Flying, Robert J. Martin, Rob Ballard
Animal Law Review
The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) has proven invaluable in minimizing the destruction of the 240 avian species listed by its enforcement agency, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), as “endangered or threatened” or “birds of conservation concern.”Recently, however, the Act is faced with a new challenge: How can it continue to achieve its objective when a highly desirable domestic source of sustainable energy—wind power—is experiencing unprecedented growth? Ever-larger wind projects propelled by giant turbines have become a serious danger to the existence of migratory birds and their natural habitats. Yet most policy makers strongly welcome and support …
From The Halls Of Congress To The Shores Of The Little T: The Snail Darter And The Dam: How Pork-Barrel Politics Endangered A Little Fish And Killed A River By Zygmunt J. B. Plater, Sara Blankenship
Animal Law Review
The snail darter has become a symbol of environmental extremism. In reality, however, the farmers, members of the Cherokee Nation, and concerned citizens were simply fighting to keep the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)’s Tellico Dam from destroying the last free-flowing miles of the Little Tennessee River. This Book Review examines the work of Zygmunt J.B. Plater, the law professor who, along with ordinary citizens, fought their case all the way to the United States Supreme Court in defense of their river, the snail darter, and the Endangered Species Act. Plater reveals the truth behind the landmark TVA v. Hill case …
Lukumi At Twenty: A Legacy Of Uncertainty For Religious Liberty And Animal Welafere, James M. Oleske Jr.
Lukumi At Twenty: A Legacy Of Uncertainty For Religious Liberty And Animal Welafere, James M. Oleske Jr.
Animal Law Review
Twenty years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, uncertainty reigns in the lower courts and among commentators over the issue of constitutionally compelled religious exemptions. Despite the Court’s general disavowal of such exemptions in Employment Division v. Smith, Lukumi appeared to breathe life into a potentially significant exception to Smith. Under that exception—which this Article calls the “selective-exemption rule”—the Free Exercise Clause may still require religious exemptions from a law when the government selectively makes available other exemptions from that law. This Article addresses the key unresolved …
Twenty Years And Change, David Favre
Twenty Years And Change, David Favre
Animal Law Review
This Introduction provides an overview of the evolution of animal law over the past twenty years, demonstrating how changes in the law, social awareness, and legal education have directly affected this field. This Introduction describes both the positive and negative changes that have taken place, from the banning of dogfighting and cockfighting by federal law and some state laws; a spread in voter-adopted legislation providing for the protection of agricultural animals; and movements to reduce the use of chimpanzees in animal research; to the limitations of the Animal Welfare Act; changes in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy …
U.S. Ivory Trade: Can A Crackdown On Trafficking Save The Last Titan?, Beth Allgood, Marina Ratchford, Peter Lafontaine
U.S. Ivory Trade: Can A Crackdown On Trafficking Save The Last Titan?, Beth Allgood, Marina Ratchford, Peter Lafontaine
Animal Law Review
Rampant poaching has put African elephants on the verge of extinction in the wild, and the United States (U.S.) is complicit in this crisis. Despite the best efforts of federal agencies, porous national borders, legal loopholes, and deep-seated difficulties in law enforcement make the U.S. a major market for illicit ivory. While the White House, the United Nations, and the European Union, along with other voices, are sounding alarms, bold and concrete actions have been slow in coming. The U.S., in particular, is only beginning to acknowledge its own role in the slaughter, and still relies on a patchwork of …
Shocked, Horrified, Sickened: How Cigarettes (And The Lessons From The Tobacco Litigation) Can Take Years Off Animal-Based Food Industries, Amanda Winalski
Shocked, Horrified, Sickened: How Cigarettes (And The Lessons From The Tobacco Litigation) Can Take Years Off Animal-Based Food Industries, Amanda Winalski
Animal Law Review
Animal-based food industries—meat, egg, and dairy—have a history of opposing even relatively minor attempts to reduce human consumption of animal-based foods. In the face of growing evidence that eating meat, eggs, and dairy is detrimental to human health, these industries and their supporters maintain the opposite: that these foods are essential for a healthy diet and have no negative impact as normally consumed. Recognizing parallels between animal-based food industries and another industry heavily invested in maintaining the notion that its product was benign as normally consumed, this Article argues the tobacco litigation saga holds instructive lessons for combatting the current …
Consistently Inconsistent: The Constitution And Animals, Marianne Sullivan
Consistently Inconsistent: The Constitution And Animals, Marianne Sullivan
Animal Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Short History Of (Mostly) Western Animal Law: Part Ii, Thomas G. Kelch
A Short History Of (Mostly) Western Animal Law: Part Ii, Thomas G. Kelch
Animal Law Review
This Article, presented in two parts, travels through animal law from ancient Babylonia to the present, analyzing examples of laws from the ancient, medieval, Renaissance and Enlightenment, recent modern, and modern historical periods. In performing this analysis, particular attention is focused on the primary motives and purposes behind these laws. What is discovered is that there has been a historical progression in the primary motives underlying animal laws in these different periods. In Part I of this Article, it was discovered that while economic and religious motives dominate the ancient and medieval periods, in the Renaissance and Enlightenment, we see …
Empowering Market Regulation Of Agricultural Animal Welfare Through Product Labeling, Sean P. Sullivan
Empowering Market Regulation Of Agricultural Animal Welfare Through Product Labeling, Sean P. Sullivan
Animal Law Review
In many Western nations, rising public concern about the welfare of agricultural animals is reflected in the adoption of direct regulatory standards governing the treatment of these animals. The United States has taken a different path, tending to rely on a “market-regulation” approach whereby consumers express their desire for specific welfare practices through their purchasing decisions. This Article explores the failure of market regulation and the welfare-preference paradox posed by consumers who express a strong preference for improved animal welfare in theory, but who simultaneously fail to demand heightened welfare standards in practice. It argues that market regulation is failing …
2012 State Legislative Review, Laura Hagen
The First Animal Law Journal, Twenty Volumes Later, Melissa Young
The First Animal Law Journal, Twenty Volumes Later, Melissa Young
Animal Law Review
Twenty volumes is no small feat for an independently funded, entirely student-run journal. With a total staff of twenty students, including a small Board comprised of Editor in Chief, James Goldstein, Jr.; Managing Editor, William Fig; Articles Editor, Kelly Jeffries; and Form and Style Editor, Benjamin Allen, Animal Law published the inaugural volume of the world’s first animal law journal in 1995.1 This landmark event was the result of the hard work of Lewis & Clark students, with some key support. In this first volume, Animal Law gave “special thanks to Benjamin Allen for his hard work and dedication in …
Meat Labeling Through The Looking Glass, Bruce Friedrich
Meat Labeling Through The Looking Glass, Bruce Friedrich
Animal Law Review
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulates meat labeling under the statutory authority of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA). The FMIA’s labeling preemption clause prohibits labeling requirements beyond federal requirements, and would thus preclude state causes of action on the basis of deceptive labels that were properly approved under federal law. Through the eyes of Kat, a hypothetical consumer concerned with the origins of the meat she purchases for her family, this Article argues that consumers should be able to pursue state law claims based on fraudulent animal welfare labels on packages of meat. This is true for …
Not Alll Dogs Go To Heaven: Judaism's Lessons In Beastly Morality, Mark Goldfeder
Not Alll Dogs Go To Heaven: Judaism's Lessons In Beastly Morality, Mark Goldfeder
Animal Law Review
This Essay examines the moral status of animals and the definition of humanity under traditional Jewish law, as contained in Biblical texts and commentaries by ancient and historical Jewish scholars. Examining whether animals are capable of moral behavior, it provides examples from various Judaic sources to support the idea that animals are capable of making conscious, moral choices. This Essay goes on to investigate the effect that morality has on the rights and rewards given to animals under Jewish law, and whether, as conscious moral actors, animals have souls. Turning more broadly to the definition of humanity, this Essay discusses …
Legislation To Protect The Welfare Of Fish, Kelly Levenda
Legislation To Protect The Welfare Of Fish, Kelly Levenda
Animal Law Review
This Article examines the marginalization of fish under current animal welfare laws and regulations, explores the treatment of farm-raised fish during transport and slaughter, and proposes legislation and regulations in these two areas. While evidence indicates that fish are capable of experiencing pain, fear, and suffering—the traditional considerations informing concepts of animal welfare—current pre-slaughter transport and slaughter practices are completely uninformed by notions of fish welfare. Comparing the cognitive and sensory capacities of fish to other animals currently receiving animal welfare recognition through official regulation, this Article argues that protections afforded to animals during transport and slaughter should similarly apply …
A Slave By Any Other Name Is Still A Slave: The Tilikum Case And Application Of The Thirteenth Amendment To Nonhuman Animals, Jeffrey S. Kerr, Martina Bernstein, Amanda S. Schwoerke, Matthew D. Strugar, Jared Goodman
A Slave By Any Other Name Is Still A Slave: The Tilikum Case And Application Of The Thirteenth Amendment To Nonhuman Animals, Jeffrey S. Kerr, Martina Bernstein, Amanda S. Schwoerke, Matthew D. Strugar, Jared Goodman
Animal Law Review
On its face, the Thirteenth Amendment outlaws the conditions and practices of slavery and involuntary servitude wherever they may exist in this country—irrespective of the victim’s race, creed, sex, or species. In 2011, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, on behalf of five wild-captured orcas, sued SeaWorld for enslaving the orcas in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment. The case presented, for the first time, the question of whether the Thirteenth Amendment’s protections can extend to nonhuman animals. This Article examines the lawsuit’s factual, theoretical, and strategic underpinnings, and argues that the district court’s opinion ultimately dismissing the suit failed …