Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (18)
- Criminal Law (12)
- Criminal Procedure (8)
- Law and Society (8)
- Courts (7)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Legal Remedies (4)
- Torts (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- First Amendment (2)
- Judges (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Construction Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- Institution
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (13)
- South Carolina Law Review (6)
- Doug Rendleman (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
-
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Frank Pommersheim (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Ira P. Robbins (1)
- Jerry R. Foxhoven Mr. (1)
- Kuei-Jung Ni (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- Rodger Citron (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Terrence Cain (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Law
The New Due Process: Rights And Remedies, Doug R. Rendleman
The New Due Process: Rights And Remedies, Doug R. Rendleman
Doug Rendleman
This article discusses the "new" due process. Perhaps new is a misnomer. Due process was not discovered recently. It has been around a long time protecting varying interests from arbitrary action. The discovery called the "new" due process is merely that procedural protections are not so limited as previously thought. This article will examine the interests encompassed by the new due process and the remedial apparatus now being developed to protect those interests.
Analyzing The Debtor's Due Process Interest, Doug Rendleman
Analyzing The Debtor's Due Process Interest, Doug Rendleman
Doug Rendleman
No abstract provided.
Does Science Speak Clearly And Fairly In Trade And Food Safety Disputes? Decent Response Of Wto Adjudication To Indecent International Standard-Making, Kuei-Jung Ni
Kuei-Jung Ni
Most international health-related standards are voluntary per se. However, the incorporation of international standard-making into WTO agreements like the SPS Agreement has drastically changed the status and effectiveness of the standards. WTO members are urged to follow international standards, even when not required to comply fully with them. Indeed, such standards have attained great influence in the trade system. Yet evidence shows that the credibility of the allegedly scientific approach of these international standard-setting institutions, especially the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex) governing food safety standards, has been eroded and diluted by industrial and political influences. Its decision-making is no longer …
Deinstitutionalization Of Status Offenders: In Perspective , Robert W. Sweet Jr.
Deinstitutionalization Of Status Offenders: In Perspective , Robert W. Sweet Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Big Business Beware: Punitive Damages Do Not Violate Fourteenth Amendment According To Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. V. Haslip, Christopher V. Carlyle
Big Business Beware: Punitive Damages Do Not Violate Fourteenth Amendment According To Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. V. Haslip, Christopher V. Carlyle
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Land Use By, For, And Of The People: Problems With The Application Of Initiatives And Referenda To The Zoning Process, Nicolas M. Kublicki
Land Use By, For, And Of The People: Problems With The Application Of Initiatives And Referenda To The Zoning Process, Nicolas M. Kublicki
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Victim Harm, Retributivism And Capital Punishment: A Philosophy Critique Of Payne V. Tennessee , R. P. Peerenboom
Victim Harm, Retributivism And Capital Punishment: A Philosophy Critique Of Payne V. Tennessee , R. P. Peerenboom
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward A Balanced Approach To "Frivolous" Litigation: A Critical Review Of Federal Rule 11 And State Sanctions Provisions , Byron C. Keeling
Toward A Balanced Approach To "Frivolous" Litigation: A Critical Review Of Federal Rule 11 And State Sanctions Provisions , Byron C. Keeling
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Walking The Invisible Line Of Punitive Damages: Txo Production Corp. V. Alliance Resources Corp. , Nancy G. Dragutsky
Walking The Invisible Line Of Punitive Damages: Txo Production Corp. V. Alliance Resources Corp. , Nancy G. Dragutsky
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Split-Recovery: A Constitutional Answer To The Punitive Damage Dilemma, Clay R. Stevens
Split-Recovery: A Constitutional Answer To The Punitive Damage Dilemma, Clay R. Stevens
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Economic View Of Innovation And Property Right Protection In The Expanded Regulatory State, J. Miles Hanisee
An Economic View Of Innovation And Property Right Protection In The Expanded Regulatory State, J. Miles Hanisee
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Political Question Or Judicial Query: An Examination Of The Modern Doctrine And Its Inapplicability To Human Rights Mass Tort Litigation, Nancy S. Williams
Political Question Or Judicial Query: An Examination Of The Modern Doctrine And Its Inapplicability To Human Rights Mass Tort Litigation, Nancy S. Williams
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Putting Buck V. Bell In Scientific And Historical Context: A Response To Victoria Nourse , Edward J. Larson
Putting Buck V. Bell In Scientific And Historical Context: A Response To Victoria Nourse , Edward J. Larson
Pepperdine Law Review
In this article written for a law-review symposium in response to a presentation on the infamous 1927 U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Buck v. Bell, Edward J. Larson argues that, at the time that the case was decided, eugenics was on the incline, not the decline. In the 1920s, the American scientific and medical community broadly backed eugenic remedies for various forms of mental illness and retardation. Legislatures, lawyers, and jurists took their cue from this scientific and medical consensus. Absent any question that the statute at issue in Buck v. Bell was validly passed by the Virginia legislature or …
Presumed Guilty, Terrence Cain
Presumed Guilty, Terrence Cain
Terrence Cain
It would probably surprise the average American that prosecutors need only prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt sometimes. Although the Due Process Clauses of the Constitution require that the government prove each element of an alleged criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt, the use of statutory presumptions has relieved the government of this responsibility, and in some cases, has even shifted the burden to the defendant to disprove the presumption. Likewise, the Sixth Amendment grants a criminal defendant the right to have the jury and the jury alone determine whether the government has met its burden and ultimately whether the …
Individual Autonomy Versus Community: Is It All Or Nothing? An Analysis Of City Of Chicago V. Morales , Keasa Hollister
Individual Autonomy Versus Community: Is It All Or Nothing? An Analysis Of City Of Chicago V. Morales , Keasa Hollister
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Absentee Post-Conviction Constitutional Safeguards – People V. Zowaski, Danielle M. Hansen
The Absentee Post-Conviction Constitutional Safeguards – People V. Zowaski, Danielle M. Hansen
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Exile On Main Street: Competing Traditions And Due Process Dissent, Colin Starger
Exile On Main Street: Competing Traditions And Due Process Dissent, Colin Starger
All Faculty Scholarship
Everybody loves great dissents. Professors teach them, students learn from them, and journalists quote them. Yet legal scholars have long puzzled over how dissents actually impact the development of doctrine. Recent work by notable empirical scholars proposes to measure the influence of dissents by reference to their subsequent citation in case law. This Article challenges the theoretical basis for this empirical approach and argues that it fails to account for the profound influence that uncited dissents have exerted in law. To overcome this gap in the empirical approach, this Article proposes an alternative method that permits analysis of contextual and …
Goodyear And Nicastro: Observations From A Transnational And Comparative Perspective, Linda J. Silberman
Goodyear And Nicastro: Observations From A Transnational And Comparative Perspective, Linda J. Silberman
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Lay Of The Land: Examining The Three Opinions In J. Mcintyre Machinery, Ltd. V. Nicastro, Adam N. Steinman
The Lay Of The Land: Examining The Three Opinions In J. Mcintyre Machinery, Ltd. V. Nicastro, Adam N. Steinman
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
The (Theoretical) Future Of Personal Jurisdiction: Issues Left Open By Goodyear Dunlop Tires V. Brown And J. Mcintyre Machinery V. Nicastro, Roberta Brilmayer, Matthew Smith
The (Theoretical) Future Of Personal Jurisdiction: Issues Left Open By Goodyear Dunlop Tires V. Brown And J. Mcintyre Machinery V. Nicastro, Roberta Brilmayer, Matthew Smith
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Six Questions In Light Of J. Mcintyre Machinery, Ltd. V. Nicastro, John Vail
Six Questions In Light Of J. Mcintyre Machinery, Ltd. V. Nicastro, John Vail
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sayonara To Fair Play And Substantial Justice, Howard B. Stravitz
Sayonara To Fair Play And Substantial Justice, Howard B. Stravitz
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Personal Jurisdiction In The Twenty-First Century: The Ironic Legacy Of Justice Brennan, Richard Dale Freer
Personal Jurisdiction In The Twenty-First Century: The Ironic Legacy Of Justice Brennan, Richard Dale Freer
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Search Of Federal Remedies For Lgbtq Students Who Are Victims Of Assault And Harassment In School., Jerry R. Foxhoven Mr.
In Search Of Federal Remedies For Lgbtq Students Who Are Victims Of Assault And Harassment In School., Jerry R. Foxhoven Mr.
Jerry R. Foxhoven Mr.
This article describes details of the harassment that was inflicted upon the individual LGBTQ students involved in many of the federal reported cases, as well as the lack of response by, and sometimes even the participation of, school personnel in the harassment. The article then goes on to examine the various legal theories that were employed by the victim-students, including constitutional theories (Due Process, Equal Protection, and First Amendment claims) as well as statutory remedies (Title IX and the Equal Access Act).
This article is written in a format that is not only interesting (by providing the details of the …
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Rodger D. Citron
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Rodger D. Citron
Rodger Citron
No abstract provided.
Democracy And Criminal Discovery Reform After Connick And Garcetti, Janet Moore
Democracy And Criminal Discovery Reform After Connick And Garcetti, Janet Moore
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
A leading cause of wrongful conviction and wasteful litigation in criminal cases is the nondisclosure of information beneficial to the defense by prosecutors and law enforcement as required by Brady v. Maryland. In Connick v. Thompson and Garcetti v. Ceballos, the Supreme Court weakened Brady’s enforceability by limiting the deterrent force of 42 U.S.C § 1983 liability. Connick highlights Garcetti’s implications as a criminal discovery case, which scholars have not fully analyzed. While Connick restricted § 1983 liability when prosecutors confess to suppressing exculpatory evidence, Garcetti restricted liability when prosecutors are disciplined for bringing Brady evidence to light. …
People V. Harnett, Michelle Minarcik
People V. Harnett, Joanna C. Peck