Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative proceedings (1)
- Appointed counsel (1)
- Deportations (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Due process (1)
-
- Equal protection (1)
- Floyd v. City of New York (1)
- Green cards (1)
- Immigrants (1)
- Intent (1)
- Joseph hearings (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- New York City (1)
- Padilla v. Kentucky (1)
- Police (1)
- Prisons (1)
- Race and law (1)
- Racial profiling (1)
- Removal proceedings (1)
- Right to effective counsel (1)
- Searches (1)
- Stop and frisk (1)
- Terry v. Ohio (1)
- United States v. City of New York (1)
- Wrongful detentions (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cascading Constitutional Deprivation: The Right To Appointed Counsel For Mandatorily Detained Immigrants Pending Removal Proceedings, Mark Noferi
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Today, an immigrant green card holder mandatorily detained pending his removal proceedings, without bail and without counsel, due to a minor crime committed perhaps long ago, faces a dire fate. If he contests his case, he may remain incarcerated in substandard conditions for months or years. While incarcerated, he will likely be unable to acquire a lawyer, access family who might assist him, obtain key evidence, or contact witnesses. In these circumstances, he will nearly inevitably lose his deportation case and be banished abroad from work, family, and friends. The immigrant's one chance to escape these cascading events is the …
A Failure Of The Fourth Amendment & Equal Protection's Promise: How The Equal Protection Clause Can Change Discriminatory Stop And Frisk Policies, Brando Simeo Starkey
A Failure Of The Fourth Amendment & Equal Protection's Promise: How The Equal Protection Clause Can Change Discriminatory Stop And Frisk Policies, Brando Simeo Starkey
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Terry v. Ohio changed everything. Before Terry, Fourth Amendment law was settled. The Fourth Amendment had long required that police officers have probable cause in order to conduct Fourth Amendment invasions; to administer a "reasonable" search and seizure, the state needed probable cause. But in 1968, the Warren Court, despite its liberal reputation, lowered the standard police officers had to meet to conduct a certain type of search: the so-called "'stop' and 'frisk.'" A "stop and frisk" occurs when a police officer, believing a suspect is armed and crime is afoot, stops the suspect, conducts an interrogation, and pats him …