Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Court Procedure In Federal Tax Cases, Robert Brown Dec 2012

Court Procedure In Federal Tax Cases, Robert Brown

Dr Robert Brown

No abstract provided.


The Supreme Court's Health Care Decision And The Problem With Relyng On The Taxing Power, David Gamage Jun 2012

The Supreme Court's Health Care Decision And The Problem With Relyng On The Taxing Power, David Gamage

David Gamage

No abstract provided.


Circumstance And Strategy: Jointly Authored Supreme Court Opinions, Laura Ray Dec 2011

Circumstance And Strategy: Jointly Authored Supreme Court Opinions, Laura Ray

Laura K. Ray

The standard form of authorship for a Supreme Court opinion is a single author who then may be joined by any colleagues who are in agreement. There is, however, a significant and overlooked variant of this form, one used in a small cluster of major cases, most of them landmark decisions, over the past seventy years: the jointly authored opinion. In these cases, there may be as many as nine authors signing an opinion (as in Cooper v. Aaron) or as few as two (as in McConnell v. FEC). All the signatories may be credited with the entire opinion (as …


Law, Fact, And Discretion In The Federal Courts: An Empirical Study, Robert Anderson Dec 2011

Law, Fact, And Discretion In The Federal Courts: An Empirical Study, Robert Anderson

Robert Anderson IV

The organization of the federal judiciary rests upon a division of labor between trial courts and appellate courts. Central to this division of labor is the standard of review, which requires that appellate courts review factual and discretionary decisions deferentially. The conventional wisdom is that appellate courts almost never reverse trial court findings of fact and rarely reverse discretionary decisions. The prevailing view, however, is greatly oversimplified. Data from federal cases suggest that standards of review operate in a much more complex and nuanced way than the conventional account would indicate. The empirical evidence suggests that the appellate courts routinely …