Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
-
- Forensic Science and Technology (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Military, War, and Peace (1)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Supreme Court Criminal Law Jurisprudence - October 2008 Term, Richard Klein
Supreme Court Criminal Law Jurisprudence - October 2008 Term, Richard Klein
Richard Daniel Klein
No abstract provided.
Mitigating The Prosecutor's Dilemma In Light Of Melendez-Diaz: Live Two-Way Videoconferencing For Analysit Testimony Regarding Chemical Analysis, Amy Ma
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Federal Rules Pending Public Comment, David A. Schlueter
Federal Rules Pending Public Comment, David A. Schlueter
Faculty Articles
In August 2011, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts published several rules for public comment. The amendment to Rule 11 would require the judge to apprise a defendant who wishes to plead guilty that, if convicted and not a United States citizen, the defendant may be deported, denied citizenship, and denied future admission to the United States. Several amendments have been proposed for Rule 12 with reference to the appropriate times for pleadings and pretrial motions, and the consequences and standards of review for untimely motions. The change to Rule 34 is intended to conform the rule to …
What Happened: Confronting Confrontation In The Wake Of Bullcoming, Bryant, And Crawford., Dibrell Waldrip, Sara M. Berkeley
What Happened: Confronting Confrontation In The Wake Of Bullcoming, Bryant, And Crawford., Dibrell Waldrip, Sara M. Berkeley
St. Mary's Law Journal
Crawford v. Washington and its progeny demonstrate the difficulty of delineating both the core and the perimeter of the Confrontation Clause. Crawford abrogated Ohio v. Roberts, forcing trial lawyers to re-evaluate the use of various types of hearsay formerly admitted upon a finding of adequate “indicia of reliability.” Later the Court issued two decisions further altering the contours of Confrontation Clause jurisprudence. Michigan v. Bryant and Bullcoming v. New Mexico. With these options, the old Roberts “indicia of reliability” test transformed into the new “primary purpose” test to identify certain testimonial statements. By significantly altering the contours of Confrontation Clause …
Potential Responses To The Melendez-Diaz Line Of Cases, Richard D. Friedman
Potential Responses To The Melendez-Diaz Line Of Cases, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Criminal prosecution is increasingly dependent on proof of the results of forensic laboratory tests. They are used, for example, to prove that a given substance contains cocaine; the prove what a driver’s blood alcohol content was; and to demonstrate that the DNA profile of some substance found at the crime scene matches that of the accused.
In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 129 S.Ct. 2527 (2009), the United States Supreme Court resolved a question that had divided the lower courts in the wake of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). The Melendez-Diaz Court held by a 5-4 vote that forensic laboratory …