Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Use Of Legal Scholarship By The Federal Courts Of Appeals: An Empirical Study (With L. Petherbridge), David Schwartz
The Use Of Legal Scholarship By The Federal Courts Of Appeals: An Empirical Study (With L. Petherbridge), David Schwartz
David L. Schwartz
No abstract provided.
Book Review: David Hricik, Patent Ethics: Litigation, David Schwartz
Book Review: David Hricik, Patent Ethics: Litigation, David Schwartz
David L. Schwartz
No abstract provided.
Explaining The Demise Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents, David Schwartz
Explaining The Demise Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents, David Schwartz
David L. Schwartz
No abstract provided.
Legal Scholarship And The United States Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit: An Empirical Study Of A National Circuit (With L. Petherbridge), David Schwartz
David L. Schwartz
It is conventional wisdom that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, a court whose jurisdiction is defined by subject matter rather than by geography, is less likely than other circuit courts of appeals to use legal scholarship in its decision-making. This common belief is regularly used to substantiate a well-worn criticism of the Federal Circuit specifically, and of national courts generally; namely, that they are substantially more insular and somehow less intellectually curious than the regional circuit courts of appeals. We were therefore very surprised to find how little empirical support the conventional wisdom finds in …