Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Disclosure Provisions Of The Model Business Corporation Act, Stanley Keller
Disclosure Provisions Of The Model Business Corporation Act, Stanley Keller
Law and Contemporary Problems
Keller discusses the "duty of disclosure" provision of the Model Business Corporation Act (MBCA). The development of disclosure requirements through decisional law rather than through statutory prescriptions highlights the important question of when corporate law should be codified legislatively and when it should be left to case-by-case judicial development. The American Bar Association's Committee on Corporate Laws ("the Committee") confronted this question when considering disclosure requirements as part of its continuing evaluation of the MBCA.
The New “Public” Corporation, Hillary A. Sale
The New “Public” Corporation, Hillary A. Sale
Law and Contemporary Problems
No abstract provided.
Comply-And-Explain: Should Directors Have A Duty To Inform?, John C. Wilcox
Comply-And-Explain: Should Directors Have A Duty To Inform?, John C. Wilcox
Law and Contemporary Problems
Wilcox discusses the compliance of the duty to inform of directors of publicly held companies. The expected long-term impact of a duty to inform would be to "operationalize" corporate governance policies and accustom boards to provide greater transparency about their deliberations and decisions on matters relating to governance, business oversight, and strategy. Regardless of whether a directors' duty to inform can be inferred from the Model Business Corporation Act or other provisions of state law, it could be implemented through the adoption of a charter or bylaw amendment initiated by the board or by shareholders.
Indemnification And Advancement Through An Agency Lens, Deborah A. Demott
Indemnification And Advancement Through An Agency Lens, Deborah A. Demott
Law and Contemporary Problems
DeMott discusses the doctrines that define entitlements to indemnification. In the corporate context, indemnification is better grounded, as in the Model Business Corporation Act (MBCA), in the necessity of furnishing corporate directors with appropriate protection against personal risk. To be sure, as the MBCA's official comments implicitly acknowledge, the position of officers, especially senior executive officers, does not fit neatly and exclusively into either an "agent" or a "non-agent" category for indemnification purposes.
The 1970s: The Committee On Corporate Laws Joins The Corporate Governance Debate, Marshall L. Small
The 1970s: The Committee On Corporate Laws Joins The Corporate Governance Debate, Marshall L. Small
Law and Contemporary Problems
No abstract provided.
Safe Harbor For Officer Reliance: Comparing The Approaches Of The Model Business Corporation Act And Delaware’S General Corporation Law, R. Franklin Balotti, Megan W. Shaner
Safe Harbor For Officer Reliance: Comparing The Approaches Of The Model Business Corporation Act And Delaware’S General Corporation Law, R. Franklin Balotti, Megan W. Shaner
Law and Contemporary Problems
Balotti and Shaner discuss the duties of and potential for imposing liability on corporate officers. The fiduciary duties of officers is addressed, in differing degrees, under Delaware law, the law frequently applied to corporate-governance disputes, and under the Model Business Corporation Act (MBCA). In discharging their fiduciary duties, directors under both the MBCA and the General Corporation Law are generally protected from personal liability if, in making business decisions, they reasonably rely on the reports and records of officers, employees, advisors, and experts of the corporation.