Law Commons^™

Taxing Civil Rights Gains, Anthony C. Infanti

Anthony C. Infanti

In this article, I take a novel approach to the question of what constitutes a “tax.” I argue that the unique burdens imposed on same-sex couples by the federal and state “defense of marriage” acts (the DOMAs) constitute a tax on lesbian and gay families.

Classifying the DOMAs as a “tax” has important substantive and rhetorical consequences. As a tax, the DOMAs are subject to the same constitutional restrictions as other taxes. This opens them to challenge under the federal constitution’s direct tax clauses and the uniformity clauses present in many state constitutions. Where such constitutional challenges are unavailable or …

Dismembering Families, Anthony C. Infanti

Anthony C. Infanti

In this paper, I explore how the deduction for extraordinary medical expenses, codified in I.R.C. section 213, furthers domination in American society. On its face, section 213 probably does not seem a likely candidate for being tagged as furthering domination. After all, this provision aims to alleviate extraordinary financial burdens on taxpayers who already suffer from significant medical problems -- and who, by definition, lack the help of insurance to relieve those burdens. But, as laudable as this goal might be, careful attention to the text and context of section 213 reveals that it does not apply to all taxpayers …