Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Government Identity Speech And Religion: Establishment Clause Limits After Summum, Mary Jean Dolan
Government Identity Speech And Religion: Establishment Clause Limits After Summum, Mary Jean Dolan
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Article offers in-depth analysis of the opinions in Pleasant Grove v. Summum. Summum is a significant case because it expands “government speech” to cover broad, thematic government identity messages in the form of donated monuments, including the much-litigated Fraternal Order of Eagles-donated Ten Commandments. The Article explores the fine distinctions between the new “government speech doctrine”— a defense in Free Speech Clause cases that allows government to express its own viewpoint and to reject alternative views—and “government speech” analyzed under the Establishment Clause, which prohibits government from expressing a viewpoint on religion, and from favoring some religions over others. …
Fundamentalism, The First Amendment, And The Rise Of The Religious Right, Randall Balmer
Fundamentalism, The First Amendment, And The Rise Of The Religious Right, Randall Balmer
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The "Licentiousness" In Religious Organizations And Why It Is Not Protected Under Religious Liberty Constitutional Provisions, Marci A. Hamilton
The "Licentiousness" In Religious Organizations And Why It Is Not Protected Under Religious Liberty Constitutional Provisions, Marci A. Hamilton
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Fundamentalist Challenges To Core Democratic Values: Exit And Homeschooling, Catherine J. Ross
Fundamentalist Challenges To Core Democratic Values: Exit And Homeschooling, Catherine J. Ross
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Perspectives On Religious Fundamentalism And Families In The U.S., Vivian E. Hamilton
Introduction: Perspectives On Religious Fundamentalism And Families In The U.S., Vivian E. Hamilton
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
God Of Our Fathers, Gods For Ourselves: Fundamentalism And Postmodern Belief, Frederick Mark Gedicks
God Of Our Fathers, Gods For Ourselves: Fundamentalism And Postmodern Belief, Frederick Mark Gedicks
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Embryo Fundamentalism, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn
Embryo Fundamentalism, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Texas Mis-Step: Why The Largest Child Removal In Modern U.S. History Failed, Jessica Dixon Weaver
The Texas Mis-Step: Why The Largest Child Removal In Modern U.S. History Failed, Jessica Dixon Weaver
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
This Article sets forth the historical and legal reasons as to how the State of Texas botched the removal of 439 children from the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints parents residing in Eldorado, Texas. The Department of Family and Protective Services in Texas overreached its authority by treating this case like a class-action removal based on an impermissible legal argument, rather than focusing on the facts and circumstances that could have been substantiated for a select group of children at risk. This impermissible legal argument regarding the “pervasive belief system” of a polygamist sect that allowed minor …
Medical Conscience And The Policing Of Parenthood, Richard F. Storrow
Medical Conscience And The Policing Of Parenthood, Richard F. Storrow
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
As state and local anti-discrimination provisions become more and more comprehensive, physicians who refuse to treat patients for reasons of sexual orientation or marital status are beginning to face legal liability. Increasingly, physicians are invoking codes of medical ethics alongside more familiar constitutional law claims in support of their claim to insulation from legal liability. This Article explores what medical ethics has to say about physicians who, for sincerely held religious reasons, refuse to treat patients for reasons of sexual orientation or marital status. The issue is explored through the lens of a case recently decided by the California Supreme …