Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Civility Issues In Federal Court Practice, Daniel Coquillette, Judith Mcmorrow
Civility Issues In Federal Court Practice, Daniel Coquillette, Judith Mcmorrow
Daniel R. Coquillette
No abstract provided.
Attorney Conduct And The Securities And Exchange Commission, Daniel Coquillette, Judith Mcmorrow
Attorney Conduct And The Securities And Exchange Commission, Daniel Coquillette, Judith Mcmorrow
Daniel R. Coquillette
No abstract provided.
A Methodology For Mentoring Writing In Law Practice: Using Textual Clues To Provide Effective And Efficient Feedback, Jane Gionfriddo, Daniel Barnett, E. Joan Blum
A Methodology For Mentoring Writing In Law Practice: Using Textual Clues To Provide Effective And Efficient Feedback, Jane Gionfriddo, Daniel Barnett, E. Joan Blum
Jane Kent Gionfriddo
Becoming a successful legal writer is a process that begins in law school and continues intensively during the beginning years of a lawyer's career. Throughout this process, in both contexts, a writer benefits enormously from feedback on his analysis, and how that analysis is conveyed, from those more experienced. Much has been written about how legal educators should respond to student written work, yet little addresses the role that supervising attorneys can play in mentoring the writing of less experienced colleagues. This article therefore proposes a methodology to help supervisor-mentors provide, in an efficient manner, effective feedback on junior lawyers' …
Decline To State: Diversity Talk And The American Law Student, Camille Gear Rich
Decline To State: Diversity Talk And The American Law Student, Camille Gear Rich
Camille Gear Rich
No abstract provided.
Arbitration And Choice: Taking Charge Of The 'New Litigation', Thomas J. Stipanowich
Arbitration And Choice: Taking Charge Of The 'New Litigation', Thomas J. Stipanowich
Thomas J. Stipanowich
Despite meaningful efforts to promote better practices and ensure quality among arbitrators and advocates, criticism of American arbitration is at a crescendo. Much of this criticism stems from the fact that arbitration under standard procedures has taken on the trappings of litigation - extensive discovery and motion practice, highly contentious advocacy, long cycle time and high cost. Paradoxically, concerns about the absence of appeal on the merits in arbitration have caused some to craft provisions calling for judicial review for errors of law or fact in awards. It is time to return to fundamentals in American arbitration. Those who seek …