Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (3)
- West Virginia University (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
-
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Santa Clara Law (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication
-
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Brian Gallini (1)
- Elizabeth Chamblee Burch (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
-
- Maryland Law Review Online (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- Pace Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (1)
- Saint Louis University Public Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- School of Law Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Thomas J. Stipanowich (1)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
There's A Pennoyer In My Foyer: Civil Procedure According To Dr. Seuss, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
There's A Pennoyer In My Foyer: Civil Procedure According To Dr. Seuss, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
This is what it purports to be: a Seussian take on civil procedure. It’s a short, fun essay that covers (1) the iron triangle of civil procedure - the role of lawyers, judges, and juries, and (2) prominent civil procedure doctrines, such as personal jurisdiction, Erie, pleading, discovery, and joinder.
Lilly Ledbetter, Take Two: The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act Of 2009 And The Discovery Rule's Place In The Pay Discrimination Puzzle, Nancy Zisk
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Managing The Unmanageable: A Brief Accounting Of A Special Master’S Thirty Years Of Experience In Complex Litigation, Paul Rice
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Managing an efficient, but fair, pretrial process in a large and complex case has always been a challenge. With the advent of electronic communications and the corresponding explosion of privilege claims, this challenge has become significantly more difficult. Indeed, it is not uncommon for corporate parties to assert tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of privilege claims. Furthermore, the resolution of these privilege questions is often compounded by difficult choice of law questions that can have the result of different substantive principles being applied to identical discovery demands originating in different jurisdictions. Additionally, before addressing the increasingly voluminous …
Which Party Pays The Costs Of Document Disclosure?, Patrick M. Connors
Which Party Pays The Costs Of Document Disclosure?, Patrick M. Connors
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Indigenous Lens Into Comparative Law: The Doctrine Of Discovery In The United States And New Zealand, Robert J. Miller, Jacinta Ruru
An Indigenous Lens Into Comparative Law: The Doctrine Of Discovery In The United States And New Zealand, Robert J. Miller, Jacinta Ruru
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Corporate Cooperation Through Cost-Sharing, Nicola Faith Sharpe
Corporate Cooperation Through Cost-Sharing, Nicola Faith Sharpe
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Applying a game-theoretic approach based on the classic prisoners' dilemma provides valuable insights into corporate managers' decision-making incentives under existing discovery rules. It demonstrates that the fee structure imposed by current discovery rules leads to inefficiency and motivates corporate litigants on either side of a controversy to employ abusive discovery practices, although each party would benefit from cooperation. Using this framework, this Article shows how a cost-sharing regime can motivate litigants to engage in cooperative discovery and, as a consequence, facilitate more efficient and less abusive discovery practices. To date, scholars, who have posited that cooperative behavior in the discovery …
Nix V. Williams And The Inevitable Discovery Exception: Creation Of A Legal Safety Net, Tom N. Mcinnis
Nix V. Williams And The Inevitable Discovery Exception: Creation Of A Legal Safety Net, Tom N. Mcinnis
Saint Louis University Public Law Review
No abstract provided.
Help Wanted: Seeking One Good Appellate Brief That Forces The Arkansas Supreme Court To Clarify Its Criminal Discovery Jurisprudence, Brian Gallini
Help Wanted: Seeking One Good Appellate Brief That Forces The Arkansas Supreme Court To Clarify Its Criminal Discovery Jurisprudence, Brian Gallini
School of Law Faculty Publications and Presentations
This Essay first argues that Arkansas has yet to conclusively articulate when a prosecutorial suppression of evidence in response to defense counsel's discovery request violates either the federal or state due process clauses, or the state rules of criminal procedure. More importantly, however, this Essay contends that the Arkansas Supreme Court should require prosecutors to turn over all statements in response to a specific discovery request even if those statements are only arguably “material” and “favorable to the accused.” Doing so would provide to defendants more protection pursuant to the Arkansas Constitution than they now enjoy under the Federal Constitution.Part …
Vol. Xiv, Tab 51 - Google's Objection To Evidence And Motion To Strike, Google
Vol. Xiv, Tab 51 - Google's Objection To Evidence And Motion To Strike, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Victor Stanley, Inc. V. Creative Pipe, Inc.: How To Utilize Rule 502 To Prevent Inadvertent Disclosure And Reduce Discovery Costs In An Age Of Electronically Stored Information, Michael J. Christin
Victor Stanley, Inc. V. Creative Pipe, Inc.: How To Utilize Rule 502 To Prevent Inadvertent Disclosure And Reduce Discovery Costs In An Age Of Electronically Stored Information, Michael J. Christin
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Litigation Discovery Cannot Be Optimal But Could Be Better: The Economics Of Improving Discovery Timing In A Digital Age, Scott A. Moss
Litigation Discovery Cannot Be Optimal But Could Be Better: The Economics Of Improving Discovery Timing In A Digital Age, Scott A. Moss
Publications
Cases are won and lost in discovery, yet discovery draws little academic attention. Most scholarship focuses on how much discovery to allow, not on how courts decide discovery disputes--which, unlike trials, occur in most cases. The growth of computer data--e-mails, lingering deleted files, and so forth--increased discovery cost, but the new e-discovery rules just reiterate existing cost-benefit proportionality limits that draw broad consensus among litigation scholars and economists. But proportionality rules are impossible to apply effectively; they fail to curb discovery excess yet disallow discovery that meritorious cases need. This Article notes proportionality's flaws but rejects the consensus blaming bad …
One May V. The 800-Pound Gorilla: An Argument For Truly Just Compensation In Condemnation Proceedings, Allison Minton
One May V. The 800-Pound Gorilla: An Argument For Truly Just Compensation In Condemnation Proceedings, Allison Minton
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Balancing The Pleading Equation, Paul Stancil
Balancing The Pleading Equation, Paul Stancil
Faculty Scholarship
Pleading standards present a tale of two asymmetries. The first is informational: Plaintiffs don't know as much as defendants about defendants' alleged wrongful behavior. Given that, a liberal pleading standard may be sensible; overly demanding pleading standards may ultimately deny justice to worthy plaintiffs who cannot know critical details of their claims before filing.
But informational asymmetry is sometimes counterbalanced by a competing cost asymmetry. In certain circumstances, the cost of litigation is radically different for plaintiffs and defendants. The primary driver of this disparity is liberal discovery; in certain kinds of cases - consumer antitrust cases, for example: defendants' …
Arbitration And Choice: Taking Charge Of The 'New Litigation', Thomas J. Stipanowich
Arbitration And Choice: Taking Charge Of The 'New Litigation', Thomas J. Stipanowich
Thomas J. Stipanowich
Despite meaningful efforts to promote better practices and ensure quality among arbitrators and advocates, criticism of American arbitration is at a crescendo. Much of this criticism stems from the fact that arbitration under standard procedures has taken on the trappings of litigation - extensive discovery and motion practice, highly contentious advocacy, long cycle time and high cost. Paradoxically, concerns about the absence of appeal on the merits in arbitration have caused some to craft provisions calling for judicial review for errors of law or fact in awards. It is time to return to fundamentals in American arbitration. Those who seek …
Help Wanted: Seeking One Good Appellate Brief That Forces The Arkansas Supreme Court To Clarify Its Criminal Discovery Jurisprudence, Brian Gallini
Help Wanted: Seeking One Good Appellate Brief That Forces The Arkansas Supreme Court To Clarify Its Criminal Discovery Jurisprudence, Brian Gallini
Brian Gallini
There's A Pennoyer In My Foyer: Civil Procedure According To Dr. Seuss, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
There's A Pennoyer In My Foyer: Civil Procedure According To Dr. Seuss, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
There’s A Pennoyer in My Foyer: Civil Procedure According to Dr. Seuss is what it purports to be: a Seussian take on civil procedure. It’s a short, fun essay that covers (1) the iron triangle of civil procedure—the role of lawyers, judges, and juries, and (2) prominent civil procedure doctrines, such as personal jurisdiction, Erie, pleading, discovery, and joinder.