Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (14)
- University of Richmond (7)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (5)
- Cleveland State University (4)
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Book suggestions (5)
- Books for judges (5)
- Article III (3)
- Judicial discretion (3)
- Rule of law (3)
-
- Canada (2)
- Death (2)
- Judge (2)
- Judicial process (2)
- Judiciary (2)
- Law (2)
- Memoriam (2)
- Memory (2)
- Minimalism (2)
- Passing (2)
- Professor (2)
- Separation of Powers (2)
- Shepherd (2)
- 9/11 (1)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Al-Qaeda (1)
- Alien (1)
- Appellate courts--Officials and employees (1)
- Application (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Ashcroft (1)
- CIA (1)
- Campaign ethics (1)
- Campaign free speech (1)
- Campaign speech (1)
- Publication
-
- UIC Law Review (9)
- University of Richmond Law Review (7)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (5)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (5)
-
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Buffalo Law Review (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Barry Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 55
Full-Text Articles in Law
Recusal And Recompense: Amending New York Recusal Law In Light Of The Judicial Pay Raise Controversy, Jeffrey T. Fiut
Recusal And Recompense: Amending New York Recusal Law In Light Of The Judicial Pay Raise Controversy, Jeffrey T. Fiut
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stacking In Criminal Procedure Adjudication;Symposium On Criminal Procedure: Judicial Proceedings, Luke M. Milligan
Stacking In Criminal Procedure Adjudication;Symposium On Criminal Procedure: Judicial Proceedings, Luke M. Milligan
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The institutionalist branch of "Law and Courts" studies how judges incorporate institutional constraints into their decision-making processes. Congressional constraints on judicial review, as the literature currently stands, fall into one of two general classes: overrides and Court-curbing measures. This taxonomy, however, is incomplete. Neither overrides nor curbing measures are needed to explain the not uncommon situation where a policy-oriented Justice deviates from a preferred vote based on the belief that such a vote will prompt Congress to alter an "insulated base rule" in a way that disrupts the Justice's larger policy agenda. An "insulated base rule" is a Congressional policy …
Free Speech & Tainted Justice: Restoring The Public's Confidence In The Judiciary In The Wake Of Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White, Gregory W. Jones
Free Speech & Tainted Justice: Restoring The Public's Confidence In The Judiciary In The Wake Of Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White, Gregory W. Jones
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The United States Supreme Court's 2002 decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White was the first shot fired in an ongoing battle over judicial campaign ethics. The White decision invalidated a Minnesota Canon of Judicial Conduct prohibiting judicial candidates from announcing their views on disputed legal or political topics. Subsequent to White, numerous states have faced challenges to their judicial canons of conduct by groups advocating for an increased breadth of permissible speech in judicial campaigns. While White and its progeny have safeguarded the first amendment rights of judicial candidates, significant concerns have been raised regarding how best to …
In Memoriam: Robert E. Shepherd, Jr., John G. Douglass
In Memoriam: Robert E. Shepherd, Jr., John G. Douglass
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Robert E. Shepherd, Jr. September 22, 1937 - December 11, 2008, Hon. Walter S. Felton Jr.
Professor Robert E. Shepherd, Jr. September 22, 1937 - December 11, 2008, Hon. Walter S. Felton Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Robert E. Shepherd, Jr.: Tending To His Flock To Improve Its Lot, John P. Cunningham
Professor Robert E. Shepherd, Jr.: Tending To His Flock To Improve Its Lot, John P. Cunningham
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Talking Originalism , Andrew B. Coan
Suggestions For American Judges: Ten Books That Merit Reading, Robert C. Berring
Suggestions For American Judges: Ten Books That Merit Reading, Robert C. Berring
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Ways Of A Judge And On Appeal, Kermit V. Lipez
The Ways Of A Judge And On Appeal, Kermit V. Lipez
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
John Marshall: Definer Of A Nation, Denise R. Johnson
John Marshall: Definer Of A Nation, Denise R. Johnson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Elements Of Legal Style, Mark P. Painter
The Elements Of Legal Style, Mark P. Painter
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Merchant Of Venice, Act Iv, Scene 1, Rebecca White Berch
The Merchant Of Venice, Act Iv, Scene 1, Rebecca White Berch
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
International Rule Of Law And Constitutional Justice In International Investment Law And Arbitration, Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann
International Rule Of Law And Constitutional Justice In International Investment Law And Arbitration, Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
Judicial administration of justice through reasoned interpretation, application and clarification of legal principles and rules is among the oldest paradigms of constitutional justice. The principles of procedural justice underlying investor-state arbitration remain controversial, especially if confidentiality and party autonomy governing commercial arbitration risk neglecting adversely affected third parties and public interests. There are also concerns that rule-following and formal equality of foreign investors and home states may not ensure substantive justice in the settlement of investment disputes unless arbitrators and courts take more seriously their customary law obligation of settling disputes in conformity with human rights obligations of governments and …
How Great Judges Think: Judges Richard Posner, Henry Friendly, And Roger Traynor On Judicial Lawmaking, Edmund Ursin
How Great Judges Think: Judges Richard Posner, Henry Friendly, And Roger Traynor On Judicial Lawmaking, Edmund Ursin
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unmasking Judicial Extremism, Carl Tobias
Unmasking Judicial Extremism, Carl Tobias
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief William's Ghost: The Problematic Persistence Of The Duty To Sit, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Chief William's Ghost: The Problematic Persistence Of The Duty To Sit, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Swinging Pendulum Of Sentencing Reform: Political Actors Regulating District Court Discretion, Lydia Brashear Tiede
The Swinging Pendulum Of Sentencing Reform: Political Actors Regulating District Court Discretion, Lydia Brashear Tiede
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Zero-Sum Judicial Elections: Balancing Free Speech And Impartiality Through Recusal Reform, David K. Stott
Zero-Sum Judicial Elections: Balancing Free Speech And Impartiality Through Recusal Reform, David K. Stott
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
William Johnson, The Dog That Did Not Bark?, Mark R. Killenbeck
William Johnson, The Dog That Did Not Bark?, Mark R. Killenbeck
Vanderbilt Law Review
The conventional wisdom is that Justice William Johnson, Jr., was the "the first dissenter." This is not literally true. The first published opinion of the Court was Georgia v. Brailsford, in which each member of the Court expressed his views seriatim. Ironically, the first to speak was the first Justice Johnson, Thomas of Maryland, whose reasoning helped create a 4-2 split that produced a number of Supreme Court firsts: the first published set of opinions, the first split decision, and the first dissent.
It was the "other" Justice Johnson, William of South Carolina, who earned the reputation as the first …
Original Sin And Judicial Independence: Providing Accountability For Justices, Paul D. Carrington, Roger C. Cramton
Original Sin And Judicial Independence: Providing Accountability For Justices, Paul D. Carrington, Roger C. Cramton
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Extraordinary Rendition: A Wrong Without A Right, Robert Johnson
Extraordinary Rendition: A Wrong Without A Right, Robert Johnson
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Neglected Justices: Discounting For History, G. Edward White
Neglected Justices: Discounting For History, G. Edward White
Vanderbilt Law Review
The category of "neglected Justices" presupposes meaningful baselines for evaluating judicial reputations. A Justice cannot be deemed "neglected" except against the backdrop of some purported consensus about that Justice's reputation and the reputations of other Justices. Moreover, when the category of "neglected Justices" encompasses the performance of Justices who served in different time periods, it also presupposes that evaluative baselines for Justices can retain their integrity in the face of historical change and historical contingency.
This Article argues that when one discounts for history in the process of evaluating judicial reputations, the effects of history are sufficiently powerful to throw …
Showcase Panel Ii: Judicial Tenure: Life Tenure Or Fixed Non-Renewable Terms?, Hon. J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii, Stephen B. Burbank, Hon. Charles J. Cooper, James Lindgren, David R. Stras
Showcase Panel Ii: Judicial Tenure: Life Tenure Or Fixed Non-Renewable Terms?, Hon. J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii, Stephen B. Burbank, Hon. Charles J. Cooper, James Lindgren, David R. Stras
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Role Of The Office Of The Administrative Law Judges Within The United States International Trade Commission, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 216 (2009), Carl C. Charneski
The Role Of The Office Of The Administrative Law Judges Within The United States International Trade Commission, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 216 (2009), Carl C. Charneski
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 makes unlawful, specifically, the importation of products that infringe intellectual property rights. The U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) is the forum in which all section 337 proceedings are adjudicated and, within the ITC, the Office of Administrative Law Judges handles all these proceedings. Section 337 cases can be exceedingly complex and technical, and the Administrative Law Judges (“ALJ”) are the initial triers of fact, administrators, and decision makers in every case. Thus, the amount of work that the ALJs—along with their staff—must meet to see these cases to completion can be substantial. …
The Legacy Of Judge Howard T. Markey, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. (Special Issue) 1 (2009), Antonin Scalia
The Legacy Of Judge Howard T. Markey, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. (Special Issue) 1 (2009), Antonin Scalia
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
On September 16, 2008, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Antonin Scalia delivered a speech on the legacy of the late Howard T. Markey. The speech was given at The John Marshall Law School’s The Legacy of Judge Howard T. Markey Symposium, held at the law school in Chicago, Illinois. The text of the speech appears here.
Obviousness Before And After Judge Markey, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. (Special Issue) 9 (2009), Mark J. Abate
Obviousness Before And After Judge Markey, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. (Special Issue) 9 (2009), Mark J. Abate
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Chief Judge Howard T. Markey left an everlasting mark on the meaning of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Chief Judge Markey viewed all inventions as combinations of old elements because, in his own words, “Only God works from nothing. Man must work with old elements.” Chief Judge Markey’s obviousness jurisprudence can be characterized by three fundamental principles. First, he looked at an invention as a whole. Second, he looked for real world evidence of nonobviousness because it was a reliable indicator of obviousness. Third, he avoided the dangers of hindsight bias by looking for a reason to combine a …
Four Opinions By Chief Judge Markey On Limiting Patent Enforcement, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. (Special Issue) 34 (2009), Joseph R. Re
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Many commentators have characterized Judge Markey and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit as being biased in favor of patent holders. These four opinions exemplify Judge Markey’s support of a strong patent system, a system that must include strong defenses against parties that have either wrongly obtained or misused patent rights.
The Role Of Juries In Managing Patent Enforcement: Judge Howard Markey's Opinions And Writings, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. (Special Issue) 41 (2009), John R. Alison
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In the 1970s, a trial by jury was rare in patent cases. By the time Chief Judge Markey left the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1989, jury trials had become the norm. Throughout Judge Markey’s time on the bench he exerted great energy to promote, define, and improve the role of law juries in patent cases. This speech by Judge Markey’s former law clerk, John R. Alison, discusses the three Markey Principles. The first principle of Judge Markey is the fundamental right to a jury trial in patent cases. Second, proceedings in jury trials for …
Toward A Unified Theory Of Retroactivity, Steven W. Allen
Toward A Unified Theory Of Retroactivity, Steven W. Allen
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.