Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Animal Rights (1)
- Asylum (1)
- BaRAC (1)
- Contracting (1)
- Curriculum (1)
-
- Fishing Rights (1)
- Government (1)
- Hunting Rights (1)
- IRAC (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Law students (1)
- Legal Doctrine (1)
- Legal Writing (1)
- Legal analysis (1)
- Legal writing (1)
- Legal-writing (1)
- Minority (1)
- North Carolina (1)
- Spousal Disinheritance (1)
- State Constitutional Law (1)
- State Constitutions (1)
- Substantial evidence (1)
- Tennessee Constitution (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Law And Practice, William Rhee
The Unmerry Widow: Spousal Disinheritance And Life Insurance In North Carolina, Jeffrey S. Kinsler
The Unmerry Widow: Spousal Disinheritance And Life Insurance In North Carolina, Jeffrey S. Kinsler
Law Faculty Scholarship
In spite of our nation’s long-held public policy of protecting surviving spouses, some people purposely disinherit their spouses. For centuries, North Carolina more or less tolerated intentional spousal disinheritance. In 1959, in an effort to protect surviving spouses from deliberate disinheritance, North Carolina adopted a “right of dissent” statute that authorized a surviving spouse to renounce the decedent spouse’s will and receive a statutorily prescribed share (ranging from one-sixth to one-half) of the decedent spouse’s probate estate. Because the dissent statute was limited to the decedent spouse’s probate estate, it was easily circumvented through the use of non-probate transfers. In …
Lost In The Maze Of Appeals: The Eleventh Circuit's Review Of Decisions By The Board Of Immigration Appeals, Amy L. Moore
Lost In The Maze Of Appeals: The Eleventh Circuit's Review Of Decisions By The Board Of Immigration Appeals, Amy L. Moore
Law Faculty Scholarship
The Eleventh Circuit reviews decisions made by the Board of Immigration Appeals with a very lenient substantial evidence test that incorporates the idea of compulsion. In other words, the record must compel an opposite conclusion for a decision to be overturned as opposed to merely being unsupported by substantial evidence. This article details the job of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the types of claims it hears, and the types of review applied to it by the Eleventh Circuit. A study of 251 cases from 1990 through 2008 suggests that the Eleventh Circuit hardly ever overturns the Board of Immigration …
The Game Is Afoot: Constitutionalizing The Right To Hunt And Fish In The Tennessee Constitution, Jeffrey Omar Usman
The Game Is Afoot: Constitutionalizing The Right To Hunt And Fish In The Tennessee Constitution, Jeffrey Omar Usman
Law Faculty Scholarship
The normative role of state constitutions, which are simultaneously paramount state law and inferior to the whims of even the most minor federal regulation, is a matter of some uncertainty. In recent years, state constitutions have been significantly affected by another wave of popular constitutionalism. As part of this movement, since 1996, seven states have adopted constitutional provisions guaranteeing a right to hunt and fish. This article explores the constitutionalization of hunting and fishing rights under state constitutions. It begins by tracing hunting and fishing rights through western legal history with a special emphasis on Ancient Rome, England, and the …
A Decade Later: Adarand And Croson And The Status Of Minority Preferences In Government Contracting, Lynn Ridgeway Zehrt
A Decade Later: Adarand And Croson And The Status Of Minority Preferences In Government Contracting, Lynn Ridgeway Zehrt
Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article analyzes sixteen decisions in an effort to assist governmental entities in achieving the noble goal of “confront[ing] the effects of racial discrimination”8 in government contracting. Part I summarizes the Supreme Court’s decisions in Adarand and Croson, focusing primarily on the Court’s definition of strict scrutiny in those decisions. It also includes a brief description of the historical development of affirmative action in government contracting. Part II explores the impact of the Adarand decision on federal programs and considers not only the statutory revisions prompted by that decision but also the subsequent appellate decisions that evaluated these federal programs …
Practice Writing: Responding To The Needs Of The Bench And Bar In First-Year Writing Programs, Amy Vorenberg, Margaret Sova Mccabe
Practice Writing: Responding To The Needs Of The Bench And Bar In First-Year Writing Programs, Amy Vorenberg, Margaret Sova Mccabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
Do first year legal writing programs really prepare law students for the rigors of practice writing? This article begins to answer this question based on attorney and judge survey results, as well as interviews with judges who had also read student work in preparation for their interview. We found that while legal writing programs do provide a good foundation for legal writing skills, improvement can be made. Important changes that we have made at Pierce Law include shorter, more frequent assignments, variation/flexibility in choice of organizational paradigm, understanding the difference between settled and unsettled areas of law, and increased emphasis …