Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Ballots (1)
- Candidates (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitution (1)
-
- Copyright law (1)
- Copyright scholarship (1)
- Elections (1)
- Executive branch (1)
- Federal agencies (1)
- Legislative process (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Lopez Torres (Margarita) (1)
- Microsoft (1)
- New York (1)
- New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres (1)
- Nominations (1)
- Obama (Barack) (1)
- Political parties (1)
- Power (1)
- Presidential transitions (1)
- Presidents (1)
- Presidents-elect (1)
- Public opinion (1)
- Twentieth Amendment (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Barack Obama, Margarita Lopez Torres, And The Path To Nomination, Ellen D. Katz
Barack Obama, Margarita Lopez Torres, And The Path To Nomination, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
Operating within these regimes, Obama was able to mount a credible--and ultimately successful--challenge to the leadership's choice for the nomination while Lopez Torres could not. This article offers an explanation why. It argues that Obama succeeded where Lopez Torres failed because the nomination process Obama traversed was more penetrable and more contestable than the one Lopez Torres faced.
Quick Off The Mark? In Favor Of Empowering The President-Elect, Nina A. Mendelson
Quick Off The Mark? In Favor Of Empowering The President-Elect, Nina A. Mendelson
Articles
The United States’s presidential transition period is too long. Between November 7, 2008, and January 20, 2009, the media quickly identified a “‘leadership vacuum.’” In contrast to those of President-elect Obama, President Bush’s approval ratings were at historic lows. One reporter commented in late November, “The markets, at least, seem to be listening to one [P]resident—and he’s not the one in the Oval Office,” and another noted that “everyone . . . ignores the actions of the lame duck.”
Pangloss Responds, Daniel A. Crane
Pangloss Responds, Daniel A. Crane
Articles
I am afraid that William Shieber and I are speaking past each other. I agree wholeheartedly with his assertion that anyone who believes that political appointees do not exert a considerable influence over the antitrust agencies is naïve. However, Technocracy and Antitrust does not advance the Panglossian view that the antitrust agencies are apolitical, if by that we mean that robotic machines devoid of human perspective or ideological commitment churn out scientifically predetermined antitrust results.
The Politics Of Intellectual Property, Jessica D. Litman
The Politics Of Intellectual Property, Jessica D. Litman
Articles
In May 2005, Keith Aoki invited me to participate on a panel on "The Politics of Copyright Law" at the 2006 Association of American Law Schools ("A.A.L.S. ") mid-year meeting workshop on Intellectual Property in Vancouver, British Columbia. The panel, renamed "The Politics of Intellectual Property," and moderated by Keith, included talks by Justin Hughes, Mark Lemley, Jay Thomas, and me, and it was followed by three concurrent sessions on "The Politics Concerning Moral Rights," "The Politics of Global Intellectual Property, " and "The Politics of Patent Reform." I'm not sure what the organizing committee had in mind when it …