Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil rights (2)
- <i> Memphis Free Speech </i> (1)
- Jr. (1)
- Antilynching activist (1)
- Asian Americans (1)
-
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Colorism (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Food stamps (1)
- Ida B. Wells-Barnett (1)
- Integration (1)
- Internment (1)
- Japanese Americans (1)
- John Waters (1)
- Journalist (1)
- Low-income families (1)
- Martin Luther King (1)
- Minorities (1)
- Movies (1)
- Poverty (1)
- Public education (1)
- Racial diversity (1)
- Racism (1)
- School desegregation (1)
- Segregation (1)
- Skin tone (1)
- Social justice (1)
- Social protest (1)
- Texas (1)
- Texas Health and Human Services Commission (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Dr. King And The Battle For Hearts And Minds, Wendy B. Scott
Dr. King And The Battle For Hearts And Minds, Wendy B. Scott
Faculty Scholarship
In 1954, a unanimous Supreme Court held that laws requiring dual public school systems, separated solely on the basis of race, violated the rights afforded to African American children under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Due Process clauses. Brown v. Board of Education marked the beginning of a judicial assault on what the Court in Loving v. Virginia called statutory schemes and state court decisions that served as “an endorsement of the doctrine of White Supremacy.” Both Chief Justice Earl Warren and Dr. King recognized that the practice of White Supremacy did more than keep people separated. In Brown, …
Outsider Citizens: Film Narratives About The Internment Of Japanese Americans, Taunya Lovell Banks
Outsider Citizens: Film Narratives About The Internment Of Japanese Americans, Taunya Lovell Banks
Faculty Scholarship
This article examines the conflicting film narratives about the internment from 1942 through 2007. It argues that while later film narratives, especially documentaries, counter early government film narratives justifying the internment, these counter-narratives have their own damaging hegemony. Whereas earlier commercial films tell the internment story through the eyes of sympathetic whites, using a conventional civil rights template … Japanese and other Asian American documentary filmmakers construct their Japanese characters as model minorities — hyper-citizens, super patriots. Further, the internment experience remains largely a male story. With the exception of Emiko Omori’s documentary film memoir, Rabbit in the Moon (2004), …
Equality And Sorority During The Decade After Brown, Taunya Lovell Banks
Equality And Sorority During The Decade After Brown, Taunya Lovell Banks
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Multilayered Racism: Courts' Continued Resistance To Colorism Claims, Taunya Lovell Banks
Multilayered Racism: Courts' Continued Resistance To Colorism Claims, Taunya Lovell Banks
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Troubled Waters: Mid-Twentieth Century American Society On "Trial" In The Films Of John Waters, Taunya Lovell Banks
Troubled Waters: Mid-Twentieth Century American Society On "Trial" In The Films Of John Waters, Taunya Lovell Banks
Faculty Scholarship
In this Article Professor Banks argues that what makes many of filmmaker John Waters early films so subversive is his use of the “white-trash” body—people marginalized by and excluded from conventional white America—as countercultural heroes. He uses the white trash body as a surrogate for talk about race and sexuality in the early 1960s. I argue that in many ways Waters’ critiques of mid-twentieth century American society reflect the societal changes that occurred in the last forty years of that century. These societal changes resulted from the civil rights, gay pride, student, anti-war and women’s movements, all of which used …
Brief For Amicus Curiae David A. Super: Supporting Plaintiff-Appellants Urging Reversal, In Howard V. Hawkins (2009)., David A. Super
Brief For Amicus Curiae David A. Super: Supporting Plaintiff-Appellants Urging Reversal, In Howard V. Hawkins (2009)., David A. Super
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court has consistently held that congressional intent governs whether federal statutes are privately enforceable. Where Congress has been silent, a line of cases culminating in Gonzaga Univ. v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002), prescribes a formula for inferring congressional intent from the structure of a statute. Here, however, Congress has not been silent: the Food and Nutrition Act specifies the amount of retroactive benefits that may be awarded households in “any judicial action arising under this Act” and makes certain records of state agencies “available for review in any action filed by a household to enforce any provision …
Woman Of Valor, Sherrilyn A. Ifill