Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Social choice (3)
- Social Choice (2)
- Appellate courts (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
-
- Constitutional law (1)
- Databases for lawyers (1)
- Decision-making (1)
- Federal deficit (1)
- Game theory (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Maternal-fetal conflict (1)
- Medical marijuana (1)
- Nash Equilibrium (1)
- Prisoners' dilemma (1)
- Stare decisis (1)
- Supreme Court databases (1)
- U.S. Courts of Appeal (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appellate Courts Inside And Out, Maxwell L. Stearns
Appellate Courts Inside And Out, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
Commentary on "Inside Appellate Courts: The Impact of Court Organization on Judicial Decision Making in the United States Courts of Appeal" by Jonathan Matthew Cohen. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2002.
Mistretta Versus Marbury: The Foundations Of Judicial Review, Maxwell L. Stearns
Mistretta Versus Marbury: The Foundations Of Judicial Review, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
No abstract provided.
Maternal Duties During Pregnancy: Toward A Conceptual Framework, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maternal Duties During Pregnancy: Toward A Conceptual Framework, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
No abstract provided.
The Public Choice Case Against The Item Veto, Maxwell L. Stearns
The Public Choice Case Against The Item Veto, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
No abstract provided.
The Misguided Renaissance Of Social Choice, Maxwell Stearns
The Misguided Renaissance Of Social Choice, Maxwell Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
No abstract provided.
Standing And Social Choice: Historical Evidence, Maxwell L. Stearns
Standing And Social Choice: Historical Evidence, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
No abstract provided.
Standing Back From The Forest: Justiciability And Social Choice, Maxwell L. Stearns
Standing Back From The Forest: Justiciability And Social Choice, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
No abstract provided.
The Remand That Made The Court Expand, Maxwell L. Stearns
The Remand That Made The Court Expand, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
No abstract provided.
Why Should Lawyers Care About Institutional Data On Courts?, Maxwell L. Stearns
Why Should Lawyers Care About Institutional Data On Courts?, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
In the “U.S. Supreme Court Judicial Data Base: providing new insights into the Courts,” Professors Harold Spaeth and Jeffrey Segal provide a brief and valuable overview of the two Supreme Court databases, with a particular focus on how those databases might be of use to those with professional legal training, namely law professors, lawyers, and perhaps also judges. In this comment, I will describe what I consider to be the limitations, and uses, of such data for those of us trained in law, and who most likely will lack the rigorous social science background familiar to most present users of …
The New Commerce Clause Doctrine In Game Theoretical Perspective, Maxwell L. Stearns
The New Commerce Clause Doctrine In Game Theoretical Perspective, Maxwell L. Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
The Roberts Court emerges at a critical juncture in the development of Commerce Clause doctrine. While the Commerce Clause doctrine implicates concerns for federalism and separation of powers, both of which are rooted in the earliest part of our constitutional history, the new Court presents an ideal opportunity to critically assess existing doctrines and to develop new analytical paradigms. The Rehnquist Court succeeded for the first time in sixty years in imposing substantive limits on the scope of this important source of Congressional power. That Court proved far less successful, however, in developing a coherent normative theory that reconciles the …