Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Taliban (2)
- Adverse (1)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Alien (1)
- America (1)
-
- Citizen (1)
- Citizenship (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Commonwealth (1)
- Complaint (1)
- Comply (1)
- Contemporary (1)
- DHS (1)
- Damages (1)
- Department of Homeland Security (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Election (1)
- Employee (1)
- Employees (1)
- Employers (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- FAIR (1)
- Federation for American Immigration Reform (1)
- Fees (1)
- First amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Geneva convention (1)
- Government speech (1)
- History (1)
- House of Delegates (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Marshall V. Northern Virginia Transportation Authority: The Supreme Court Of Virginia Rules That Taxes Can Be Imposed By Elected Bodies Only, Patrick M. Mcsweeney, Wesley G. Russell Jr.
Marshall V. Northern Virginia Transportation Authority: The Supreme Court Of Virginia Rules That Taxes Can Be Imposed By Elected Bodies Only, Patrick M. Mcsweeney, Wesley G. Russell Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Whistling While You Work: Expanding Whistleblower Laws To Include Non-Workplace-Related Retaliation After Burlington Northern V. White, Robert Johnson
Whistling While You Work: Expanding Whistleblower Laws To Include Non-Workplace-Related Retaliation After Burlington Northern V. White, Robert Johnson
University of Richmond Law Review
This comment will not attempt to harmonize the different standards or predict a future course of interpretation. Instead, it will address the existing disparity as an opportunity to amend whistleblower laws to provide meaningful protection against alltypes of retaliation, not just those that affect the whistleblower's terms or conditions ofemployment. With this broad goal as a basis, this comment will specifically advocate amending all federal whistleblower statutes' retaliation provisions to conform to Title VII's retaliation provision. This would eliminate the requirement that the retaliation affect the terms or conditions of employment and incorporate the public policy rationale outlined in Burlington …
Save America: Stop Illegal Immigration, Hon. Virgil H. Goode Jr.
Save America: Stop Illegal Immigration, Hon. Virgil H. Goode Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
Security is an overriding issue confronting the United States, and if we want enhanced security, illegal immigration must be stopped. In fact, illegal immigration is an addiction that the United States must break, or it will break the United States.
Born In The U.S.A.? Rethinking Birthright Citizenship In The Wake Of 9/11, John C. Eastman
Born In The U.S.A.? Rethinking Birthright Citizenship In The Wake Of 9/11, John C. Eastman
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review: Long Before Stonewall: Histories Of Same-Sex Sexuality In Early America, John R. Pagan
Book Review: Long Before Stonewall: Histories Of Same-Sex Sexuality In Early America, John R. Pagan
Law Faculty Publications
Book review of Long Before Stonewall: Histories of Same-Sex Sexuality in Early America by Thomas A. Foster
International Myopia: Hamdan's Shortcut To "Victory", Michael W. Lewis
International Myopia: Hamdan's Shortcut To "Victory", Michael W. Lewis
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Employee Speech, Categorical Balancing And § 1983: A Critique Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Sheldon H. Nahmod
Public Employee Speech, Categorical Balancing And § 1983: A Critique Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Sheldon H. Nahmod
University of Richmond Law Review
I propose to discuss Garcetti's First Amendment reasoning as well as the implications of the § 1983' setting in which Garcetti and other public employee free speech cases typically arise. After briefly setting out the Court's opinion and the three dissenting opinions, I begin by addressing the pros and cons of Garcetti, and in the course of so doing, I discuss the prior Pickering-Connick landscape that Garcetti so significantly altered. I consider the deeper First Amendment implications of Garcetti, including itsuse of categorical balancing to create an absolute immunity fromFirst Amendment liability for employer discipline based on job-required public employee …