Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Surveillance (2)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitution (1)
-
- Constitutional Court (1)
- Constitutional protection (1)
- Cyberlaw (1)
- Cyberspace (1)
- Democracy (1)
- E-mail (1)
- Education (1)
- Electronic mail (1)
- FISA (1)
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (1)
- Foreign affairs (1)
- ISP (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Internet Service Provider (1)
- Plyler (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Reasonable expectation of privacy (1)
- Socio-economic rights (1)
- South Africa (1)
- Thirteenth amendment (1)
- Undocumented children (1)
- Virtual border (1)
- Warrant (1)
- Warshak v. United States (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Balancing Competing Individual Constitutional Rights: Raising Some Questions, Taunya Banks
Balancing Competing Individual Constitutional Rights: Raising Some Questions, Taunya Banks
Taunya Lovell Banks
Despite increasing support for global human rights ..., some scholars and constitutional democracies, like the United States, continue to resist constitutionalizing socio-economic rights. Socio-economic rights, unlike political and civil constitutional rights that usually prohibit government actions, are thought to impose positive obligations on government. As a result, constitutionalizing socio-economic rights raises questions about separation of powers and the competence of courts to decide traditionally legislative and executive matters. ... [W]hen transitional democracies, like South Africa, choose to constitutionalize socio-economic rights, courts inevitably must grapple with their role in the realization of those rights.... Two questions immediately come to mind: (1) …
The Thirteenth Amendment And Access To Education For Children Of Undocumented Workers: A New Look At Plyler V. Doe, Maria Ontiveros, Joshua Drexler
The Thirteenth Amendment And Access To Education For Children Of Undocumented Workers: A New Look At Plyler V. Doe, Maria Ontiveros, Joshua Drexler
Maria L. Ontiveros
This paper examines the extent to which the Thirteenth Amendment can be used to guarantee access to public education for the children of undocumented workers. It offers a reimagined version of Plyer, written using the Thirteenth Amendment, instead of the Fourteenth Amendment. After offering a brief summary of Thirteenth Amendment jurisprudence, it offers a variety of theoretical frameworks for analyzing the denial of education under the U.S. Constitution. It argues that the Thirteenth Amendment can provide a powerful tool for litigation, moral persuasion, organizing and legislation in the area.
Fourth Amendment Protection For Stored E-Mail, Susan Freiwald, Patricia L. Bellia
Fourth Amendment Protection For Stored E-Mail, Susan Freiwald, Patricia L. Bellia
Susan Freiwald
The question of whether and how the Fourth Amendment regulates government access to stored e-mail remains open and pressing. A panel of the Sixth Circuit recently held in Warshak v. United States, 490 F.3d 455 (6th Cir. 2007), that users generally retain a reasonable expectation of privacy in the e-mails they store with their Internet Service Providers (ISPs), which implies that government agents must generally acquire a warrant before they may compel ISPs to disclose their users' stored e-mails. The Sixth Circuit, however, is reconsidering the case en banc. This Article examines the nature of stored e-mail surveillance and argues …
Electronic Surveillance At The Virtual Border, Susan Freiwald
Electronic Surveillance At The Virtual Border, Susan Freiwald
Susan Freiwald
A virtual border divides people into two groups: those subject to the Fourth Amendment’s protections when the U.S. government conducts surveillance of their communications and those who are not. The distinction derives from a separation in powers: inside the virtual border, U.S. citizens and others enjoy the extensive oversight of the judiciary of executive branch surveillance. Judges review such surveillance before, during, and after it transpires. Foreign persons subject to surveillance in foreign countries fall within the executive branch’s’ foreign affairs function. However, the virtual border does not exactly match the physical border of the United States. Some people inside …