Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (24)
- Supreme Court of the United States (19)
- Courts (12)
- Legal History (11)
- Judges (10)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Jurisprudence (7)
- Law and Society (6)
- Law and Politics (5)
- First Amendment (4)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Election Law (2)
- Land Use Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Sociology (2)
- Taxation-Federal (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- African American Studies (1)
- Institution
-
- New York Law School (9)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (8)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- BLR (3)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Selected Works (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- George Washington University Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (8)
- NYLS Law Review (8)
- Scholarly Works (8)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
-
- ExpressO (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- John C. Eastman (2)
- Saint Louis University Public Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Nick J. Sciullo (1)
- Publications (1)
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- Supreme Court Overviews (1)
- Wilson R. Huhn (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 67
Full-Text Articles in Law
Dred Scott And The Crisis Of 1860, Louise Weinberg
Dred Scott And The Crisis Of 1860, Louise Weinberg
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Recent suggestions to the contrary notwithstanding, the Dred Scott decision and the controversy over the extension of slavery into the territories were at the very center of the crisis of 1860. This paper fills in the social, political, economic, and legal backgrounds of that crisis in order to clarify the centrality of Dred Scott in the election of Abraham Lincoln and to the ensuing destruction of the Union.
Scott V. Sandford: The Court's Most Dreadful Case And How It Changed History, Paul Finkelman
Scott V. Sandford: The Court's Most Dreadful Case And How It Changed History, Paul Finkelman
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Dred Scott, without doubt, is the most controversial case in the history of the United States Supreme Court. Unlike the controversies that surround other decisions of the Court, the controversy surrounding Dred Scott does not turn on if the outcome or Chief Justice Taney's analysis was wrong, but rather on why the outcome and Chief Justice Taney's analysis were wrong. This article focuses on the political goals Taney attempted to accomplish through his decision in Dred Scott. Though there existed reasons for Taney's belief that his decision in Dred Scott would once and for all end the political …
Thirteen Ways Of Looking At Dred Scott, Jack M. Balkin, Sanford Levinson
Thirteen Ways Of Looking At Dred Scott, Jack M. Balkin, Sanford Levinson
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Dred Scott v. Sandford is a classic case that is relevant to almost every important question of contemporary constitutional theory.
Dred Scott connected race to social status, to citizenship, and to being a part of the American people. One hundred fifty years later these connections still haunt us; and the twin questions of who is truly American and who America belongs to still roil our national debates.
Dred Scott is a case about threats to national security and whether the Constitution is a suicide pact. It concerns whether the Constitution follows the flag and whether constitutional rights obtain in federally …
Rethinking Dred Scott: New Context For An Old Case, Austin Allen
Rethinking Dred Scott: New Context For An Old Case, Austin Allen
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Scholars have misunderstood the context in which Dred Scott emerged. Leading historical interpretations of the decision have relied too heavily on accounts developed by antebellum Republicans and on mid-twentieth-century legal theory. This article offers an alternative account of Dred Scott's origins and argues that the decision emerged from a series of unintended consequences resulting from the Taney Court's efforts to incorporate a Jacksonian vision of governance into constitutional law. By 1857, this effort had generated tensions that made a sweeping decision like Dred Scott nearly unavoidable. The inescapable nature of Dred Scott carries implications for constitutional theorists, especially those …
The New Fiction: Dred Scott And The Language Of Judicial Authority, Mark A. Graber
The New Fiction: Dred Scott And The Language Of Judicial Authority, Mark A. Graber
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Claims that the Justices in Dred Scott abandoned a tradition of judicial restraint rely on an anachronistic measure for judicial activism. Antebellum Justices asserted that laws were unconstitutional only when restraining state officials. Judicial etiquette, in their opinion, required more circumspection when imposing constitutional limits on a coordinate branch of the national government. Contrary to accepted wisdom, the Justices before the Civil War imposed constitutional limitations on federal power in approximately twenty cases. They did so, however, without explicitly declaring federal legislation unconstitutional. The Justices in some federal cases ignored the plain meaning of federal statutes on the ground that …
Dred Scott: Tiered Citizenship And Tiered Personhood, Henry L. Chambers Jr.
Dred Scott: Tiered Citizenship And Tiered Personhood, Henry L. Chambers Jr.
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The Dred Scott Court accepted and perpetuated the notion that our Constitution afforded multiple tiers of citizenship and multiple tiers of personhood through which different groups of citizens and different groups of persons would receive varying sets of rights. Through their language and interpretation, the Reconstruction Amendments largely resolved this issue by providing a formal equality that created a single tier of citizenship and a single tier of personhood. Though, as a formal matter, tiered citizenship and tiered personhood are unacceptable, the issue is not fully resolved as a practical matter. Tiered citizenship and tiered personhood may exist when the …
First Principles For Virginia's Fifth Century, Hon. Robert F. Mcdonnell
First Principles For Virginia's Fifth Century, Hon. Robert F. Mcdonnell
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Eminent Domain: Judicial And Legislative Responses To Kelo, Alan Weinstein
Eminent Domain: Judicial And Legislative Responses To Kelo, Alan Weinstein
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
It has been almost a year and a half since the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S. Ct. 2655 (2005), that the federal Constitution does not bar government from using eminent domain for economic development purposes. That ruling precipitated an unprecedented negative reaction in state legislatures. 1 Now, Ohio has delivered the first post-Kelo state supreme court decision to address the constitutionality of eminent domain. On July 26, in City of Norwood v. Horney, 2006 WL 2096001, a unanimous Ohio Supreme Court rejected the arguments of the majority in Kelo and emphatically stated that …
How Antidiscrimination Law Learned To Live With Racial Inequality, Matthew Lindsay
How Antidiscrimination Law Learned To Live With Racial Inequality, Matthew Lindsay
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article explores a great paradox at the heart of the prevailing paradigm of American antidiscrimination law: the colorblindness ideal. In theory, and often in practice, that ideal is animated by a genuine commitment to liberal, individualist, race-neutral egalitarianism. For many of its partisans, colorblindness entails not only a negative injunction against race-conscious decisionmaking, but also, crucially, an affirmative program for the achievement of true racial equality. For these proponents, scrupulously race-neutral decisionmaking both advances the interests of racial minorities and embodies the best aspirations of the civil rights movement. In this worldview, colorblindness offers the only true antidote for …
Florida East Coast Railway And The Structure Of Administrative Law, Michael P. Healy
Florida East Coast Railway And The Structure Of Administrative Law, Michael P. Healy
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
A typical Administrative Law course presents the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co. as establishing the rule that statutory text quite close to the magic words, "on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing," is needed to trigger the Administrative Procedure Act's (APA) formal hearing requirements for a rulemaking. Florida East Coast Railway is a prime example of an underrated case because, even though the case is well known, its renown is a consequence only of its black letter rule about rulemaking procedures. Many scholars and practitioners do not appreciate the case for …
The Supreme Court Report 2005-06, Julie M. Cheslik, Jamie Landes, Leah Pollema, Michael Shelton
The Supreme Court Report 2005-06, Julie M. Cheslik, Jamie Landes, Leah Pollema, Michael Shelton
Faculty Works
This article reviews the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court for the 2005-2006 term focusing on decisions of particular relevance to state and local government. The Court's 2005-06 Term began with much speculation as one, then a second new Justice joined the Court. After the close of the 2004-05 Term, the Court suffered the loss of Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who succumbed to the thyroid cancer that had plagued him during that Term. President Bush ultimately replaced him with Judge John G. Roberts, who began the new Term and authored his fi rst opinion, the traditional 9-0 opinion of a …
The Roberts Court: Year 1, Lori A. Ringhand
The Roberts Court: Year 1, Lori A. Ringhand
ExpressO
This paper is an empirical examination of the recently ended 2005 Supreme Court term. The paper, in addition to reviewing the work of the Court as a whole, also examines the jurisprudence of new justices Roberts and Alito. In doing so, it proposes the intriguing possibility that these two justices may share a jurisprudential approach different from the Court's more established conservatives. If correct, this raises numerous and interesting possibilities for the future of conservativism on the Supreme Court.
The Roberts Court: Year 1, Lori A. Ringhand
The Roberts Court: Year 1, Lori A. Ringhand
Scholarly Works
This paper is an empirical analysis of the Supreme Court's recently-ended 2005 term, including an examination of the issues raised by, and the ideological direction of, the decisions issued by the Court. In addition to reviewing the work of the Court as a whole, the paper also separately examines the jurisprudence of new Justices Roberts and Alito. In doing so, it raises the possibility that these justices may have more in common with each other than with the Court's more established conservative members. The paper also demonstrates that the Court, pursuant to one of Justice Roberts' frequently stated goals, was …
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2005 Overview, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute, Rebecca Cady
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2005 Overview, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute, Rebecca Cady
Supreme Court Overviews
No abstract provided.
"Lewd And Immoral": Nude Dancing, Sexual Expression, And The First Amendment, Kevin Case
"Lewd And Immoral": Nude Dancing, Sexual Expression, And The First Amendment, Kevin Case
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Nude dancing is a particularly awkward fit with the First Amendment. Should the Constitution protect this kind of "speech?" The question has vexed the Supreme Court. While most of the Court has agreed that nude dancing falls within the First Amendment, plurality opinions relegate nude dancing to the "outer ambit" of shielded speech, setting forth confusing and ultimately unsustainable legal tests.
This Note contends that nude dancing can convey powerful and particularized erotic messages of sexual desire, availability, and appreciation of the nude female form. It is not mere "conduct." Moreover, arguments for categorizing nude dancing as "low value" speech, …
The Uses Of History In The Supreme Court's Takings Clause Jurisprudence, Jonathan Lahn
The Uses Of History In The Supreme Court's Takings Clause Jurisprudence, Jonathan Lahn
Chicago-Kent Law Review
In a series of seminal cases interpreting the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, the United States Supreme Court has used arguments that can be called "historical" to justify its holdings and negotiate the relationship between the static language of the Constitution and the dynamic realities of American life. While historical arguments have been a recurring theme in Takings Clause jurisprudence over the past eighty years, the way in which they are used has shifted. While historical accounts of changes in American society over time once served to justify new forms of governmental intervention in the realm of private property, a new …
The Federal Circuit And The Supreme Court, Arthur J. Gajarsa, Lawrence P. Cogswell
The Federal Circuit And The Supreme Court, Arthur J. Gajarsa, Lawrence P. Cogswell
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Daimlerchrysler V. Cuno: An Escape From The Dormant Commerce Clause Quagmire?, S. Mohsin Reza
Daimlerchrysler V. Cuno: An Escape From The Dormant Commerce Clause Quagmire?, S. Mohsin Reza
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Where Do We Draw The Line? Partisan Gerrymandering And The State Of Texas, Whitney M. Eaton
Where Do We Draw The Line? Partisan Gerrymandering And The State Of Texas, Whitney M. Eaton
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Representative Government, Representative Court? The Supreme Court As A Representative Body, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Representative Government, Representative Court? The Supreme Court As A Representative Body, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Faculty Scholarship
In this Symposium Essay, I propose, as a thinking matter, that we expand the number of Supreme Court justices to increase the representation of various demographic groups on the Court. In Part I, I advance the argument that the Court should be regarded as a demographically representative body of the citizens of the United States, and in Part II, I argue that the Court should be enlarged to ensure diverse representation of all voices on the most powerful judicial body of our nation.
The Constitution As Idea: Defining Describing Deciding In Kelo, Marc L. Roark
The Constitution As Idea: Defining Describing Deciding In Kelo, Marc L. Roark
ExpressO
In June 2005, the Supreme Court in a Five to Four Decision marked its most controversial decision in recent memory. The case of Kelo v. City of New London, set off a fire storm of response to the Court’s ruling that economic development takings satisfied the Fifth Amendment. This essay is about Kelo. It is about how the Court uses words, how the defining ability of words create institutional space in which the Court operates, and which defines things beyond the words.
John Paul Stevens, Human Rights Judge, Diane Marie Amann
John Paul Stevens, Human Rights Judge, Diane Marie Amann
Scholarly Works
This article explores the nature and origins of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens' engagement with international and foreign law and norms. It first discusses Stevens' pivotal role in the revived use of such norms to aid constitutional interpretation, as well as 1990s opinions testing the extent to which constitutional protections reach beyond the water's edge and 2004 opinions on post-September 11 detention. It then turns to mid-century experiences that appear to have contributed to Stevens' willingness to consult foreign context. The article reveals that as a code breaker Stevens played a role in the downing of the Japanese general …
Exploring The Judicial Philosophy And Intellectual Independence Of John Marshall Harlan I: A Temporal Examination Across Three Chief Justices, George S. Yacoubian
Exploring The Judicial Philosophy And Intellectual Independence Of John Marshall Harlan I: A Temporal Examination Across Three Chief Justices, George S. Yacoubian
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
That Pernicious Pop-Up, The Prima Facie Case, Michael Hayes
That Pernicious Pop-Up, The Prima Facie Case, Michael Hayes
All Faculty Scholarship
This article first explains the role the prima facie case has played in discrimination cases, from its creation in McDonnell Douglas through the Supreme Court's decisions in Aikens and Reeves, up to the application of Reeves by lower courts in the past several years. Next, this article focuses on Reeve's identification of "strength of the prima facie case" as a factor to be considered on summary judgment, and discusses why it would be unwise and unworkable to interpret the words "prima facie case" in that factor as having the same meaning as the "prima facie case" proved in the first …
Beyond Abstraction: The Law And Economics Of Copyright Scope And Doctrinal Efficiency, Matthew Sag
Beyond Abstraction: The Law And Economics Of Copyright Scope And Doctrinal Efficiency, Matthew Sag
Faculty Articles
Uncertainty as to the optimum extent of protection generally limits the capacity of law and economics to translate economic theory into coherent doctrinal recommendations in the realm of copyright. This Article explores the relationship between copyright scope, doctrinal efficiency, and welfare from a theoretical perspective to develop a framework for evaluating specific doctrinal recommendations in copyright law.
The usefulness of applying this framework in either rejecting or improving doctrinal recommendations is illustrated with reference to the predominant law and economics theories of fair use. The metric-driven analysis adopted in this Article demonstrates the general robustness of the market-failure approach to …
The Supreme Court’S Analysis Of Issues Raised By Death Penalty Litigants In The Court's 2004 Term, Richard Klein
The Supreme Court’S Analysis Of Issues Raised By Death Penalty Litigants In The Court's 2004 Term, Richard Klein
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Takings Cases In The October 2004 Term (Symposium: The Seventeenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Leon D. Lazer
Takings Cases In The October 2004 Term (Symposium: The Seventeenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Leon D. Lazer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
A Poster Child For Us (Symposium: The Effects Of Capital Punishment On The Administration Of Justice), Robert Blecker
A Poster Child For Us (Symposium: The Effects Of Capital Punishment On The Administration Of Justice), Robert Blecker
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Sniffing Out The Problems: A Casenote Study Of The Analysis And Effects Of The Supreme Court’S Decision In Illinois V. Caballes, Amanda M. Basch
Sniffing Out The Problems: A Casenote Study Of The Analysis And Effects Of The Supreme Court’S Decision In Illinois V. Caballes, Amanda M. Basch
Saint Louis University Public Law Review
No abstract provided.
Imminent Change: A Recommended Response For Missouri In The Wake Of The Supreme Court’S Eminent Domain Decision In Kelo V. City Of New London, Timothy Niedbalski
Imminent Change: A Recommended Response For Missouri In The Wake Of The Supreme Court’S Eminent Domain Decision In Kelo V. City Of New London, Timothy Niedbalski
Saint Louis University Public Law Review
No abstract provided.