Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Columbia Journal of Gender and Law (2)
- Domestic partnership (2)
- Domestic relations (2)
- Same-sex marriage (2)
- American Law Institute (ALI) (1)
-
- Antidiscrimination (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Character-based retribution (1)
- Civil union (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional privacy (1)
- Contract law (1)
- Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (1)
- Different-sex couple (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Gay American (1)
- Gay community (1)
- Gay couple (1)
- Hate speech (1)
- History of marriage (1)
- Informal union (1)
- Judicial protection (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Lawrence (1)
- Lawrence v. Texas (1)
- Legal formalism (1)
- Legal protection (1)
- Marriage obligation (1)
- Marvin v. Marvin (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Historical Guide To The Future Of Marriage For Same-Sex Couples, Suzanne B. Goldberg
A Historical Guide To The Future Of Marriage For Same-Sex Couples, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
History and tradition have emerged, together, as contemporary flagship arguments for limiting marriage to different-sex couples. According to advocates of "traditional marriage," same-sex couples can be excluded from marriage today because marriage always has been reserved to male-female couples. Further, some contend, the restriction of marriage to different-sex couples has long been understood as necessary to provide channels to control naturally procreative (i.e., male-female) relationships.
However popular these claims might be in op-ed pieces and on talk radio, when they are made in the litigation context, the question is not whether they have rhetorical appeal but rather whether they can …
Beyond Lawrence: Metaprivacy And Punishment, Jamal Greene
Beyond Lawrence: Metaprivacy And Punishment, Jamal Greene
Faculty Scholarship
Lawrence v. Texas remains, after three years of precedential life, an opinion in search of a principle. It is both libertarian – Randy Barnett has called it the constitutionalization of John Stuart Mill's On Liberty – and communitarian – William Eskridge has described it as the gay rights movement's Brown v. Board of Education. It is simultaneously broad, in its evocation of our deepest spiritual commitments, and narrow, in its self-conscious attempts to avoid condemning laws against same-sex marriage, prostitution, and bestiality. This Article reconciles these competing claims on Lawrence's jurisprudential legacy. In Part I, it defends the …
Domestic Partnerships, Implied Contracts, And Law Reform, Elizabeth S. Scott
Domestic Partnerships, Implied Contracts, And Law Reform, Elizabeth S. Scott
Faculty Scholarship
The domestic partnership chapter of the Principles is the shortest chapter, but, as the contributions to this volume suggest, among the most interesting to many people. The legal regulation of informal intimate unions generally and particularly the Principles' approach of creating a status that carries the legal rights and obligations of marriage between cohabiting parties have generated considerable debate. In some quarters, the domestic partnership provisions are admired as an effective mechanism to protect dependent partners in marriage-like unions who otherwise may be unable to establish claims to property and support when their relationships end. Others praise the Principles for …
The Politics Of Same-Sex Marriage Politics, Katherine M. Franke
The Politics Of Same-Sex Marriage Politics, Katherine M. Franke
Faculty Scholarship
In this Essay I would like to share some reflections on the politics of same-sex marriage politics. In a very short period of time, this issue has moved to the center of the gay and lesbian rights movement as well as larger mainstream political and legal debates. Some have even argued that this issue affected, if not determined, the outcome of the 2004 presidential election. This, I believe, is rather an overstatement, but I must concede that the issue has gained traction in ways that most of us would not have predicted five years ago. The states of Vermont and …
Morals-Based Justifications For Lawmaking: Before And After Lawrence V. Texas, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Morals-Based Justifications For Lawmaking: Before And After Lawrence V. Texas, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
Forever, it seems, the power to shape public morality has been seen as central to American governance. As one of the morality tradition's chief promoters, the Supreme Court itself has regularly endorsed and applauded government's police power to regulate the public's morality along with the public's health and welfare.
How, then, can we make sense of the Court's declaration in Lawrence v. Texas that the state's interest in preserving or promoting a particular morality among its constituents did not amount even to a legitimate interest to justify a Texas law criminalizing sexual intimacy between consenting adults? Has the Court unforeseeably …