Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Unwritten Article, Erik M. Jensen
The Unwritten Article, Erik M. Jensen
Faculty Publications
A law review article without footnotes? Unthinkable. But what about an article with only footnotes - and footnotes to footnotes? Thinkable. And here it is.
Performance Scholarship And The Internal Revenue Code, Erik M. Jensen
Performance Scholarship And The Internal Revenue Code, Erik M. Jensen
Faculty Publications
If we can have performance art-and we can-why not performance scholarship? This commentary suggests an entirely new scholarly emphasis for legal academics. (OK, it's not entirely new, but it's new for those of us not teaching trial practice.)
Law Review Correspondence: Better Read Than Dead?, Erik M. Jensen
Law Review Correspondence: Better Read Than Dead?, Erik M. Jensen
Faculty Publications
These essays were part of a mini-symposium, “Of Correspondence and Commentary,” published by the Connecticut Law Review. At the time, a number of prominent law reviews had begun to publish “correspondence,” shorter pieces generally commenting on work published in the reviews. Whatever they were called, however, these pieces looked an awful lot like articles, complete with footnotes, titles with colons, and other law-review-type stuff. The author used the creation of correspondence sections to ruminate on the nature of legal scholarship, as published in student-edited law reviews, and in particular to wonder whether authors were using correspondence sections as backdoor ways …
A Call For A New Buffalo Law Scholarship, Erik M. Jensen
A Call For A New Buffalo Law Scholarship, Erik M. Jensen
Faculty Publications
Those who haven't been paying attention to buffalo law should.
The Law Review Manuscript Glut: The Need For Guidelines, Erik M. Jensen
The Law Review Manuscript Glut: The Need For Guidelines, Erik M. Jensen
Faculty Publications
Legal academics generally publish in student-edited journals that have no sole-submission requirement, and it is common for authors to submit articles to dozens of journals at a time. As a result, law reviews are buried in manuscripts. Most manuscripts cannot even be looked at, much less evaluated, and there’s not much reason for evaluation anyway: a journal has little chance to publish any particular article. In short, the legal publication system is broken. (Indeed, given the ease and trivial cost of electronic submission - why not submit the article on artichoke law to Yale as well as So-So State? - …